Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000200307 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The adulteration of dead chicken meat with halal meat is a concern in Pakistan that can harm safety of meat as well as religious beliefs of the Muslims. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to evaluate slaughtering methods (Islamic and decapitation) with dead chicken meat on composition, quality and safety attributes. Purposely, (n=24) birds were slaughtered and (n=12) dead birds samples were collected and subjected to proximate, mineral and quality analysis including pH, color (L*, a*, b*), cooking loss, texture, as well as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), peroxide value (PV), haem and non-haem iron. The results indicated ash content, minerals and oxidation parameters including TBARS, PV affected significantly (p<0.05). The highest Iron (Fe) and Magnesium (Mg) levels reported in dead bird meat were 14.21±0.99 and 959.62±2.11 whereas, the lowest in halal slaughtered bird’s meat were 10.09±1.10 and 870.48±2.11, respectively. However, Manganese (Mn) was only detected in halal slaughtered bird meat. Likewise, pH of dead chicken meat was lowest among treatments however, L* was highest in halal slaughtered bird meat. Additionally, the lowest lipid oxidation and haem iron values reported in halal slaughtered meat were 0.32±0.02 and 2.32±0.21, lower than in decapitated and dead bird meat. Our findings draw lines between slaughtering methods and mineral analysis could be used for the differentiation of halal slaughtered meats with dead chicken meat. |
id |
FACTA-1_6a512443b8125c6130db5d567e644c70 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-635X2020000200307 |
network_acronym_str |
FACTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds MeatFood SafetyRitual SlaughterDead bird meatoxidative stabilityABSTRACT The adulteration of dead chicken meat with halal meat is a concern in Pakistan that can harm safety of meat as well as religious beliefs of the Muslims. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to evaluate slaughtering methods (Islamic and decapitation) with dead chicken meat on composition, quality and safety attributes. Purposely, (n=24) birds were slaughtered and (n=12) dead birds samples were collected and subjected to proximate, mineral and quality analysis including pH, color (L*, a*, b*), cooking loss, texture, as well as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), peroxide value (PV), haem and non-haem iron. The results indicated ash content, minerals and oxidation parameters including TBARS, PV affected significantly (p<0.05). The highest Iron (Fe) and Magnesium (Mg) levels reported in dead bird meat were 14.21±0.99 and 959.62±2.11 whereas, the lowest in halal slaughtered bird’s meat were 10.09±1.10 and 870.48±2.11, respectively. However, Manganese (Mn) was only detected in halal slaughtered bird meat. Likewise, pH of dead chicken meat was lowest among treatments however, L* was highest in halal slaughtered bird meat. Additionally, the lowest lipid oxidation and haem iron values reported in halal slaughtered meat were 0.32±0.02 and 2.32±0.21, lower than in decapitated and dead bird meat. Our findings draw lines between slaughtering methods and mineral analysis could be used for the differentiation of halal slaughtered meats with dead chicken meat.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000200307Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.22 n.2 2020reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSohaib,MZafar,MSArshad,MSNauman,KMalhi,IYeng2020-09-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2020000200307Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2020-09-01T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
title |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat Sohaib,M Food Safety Ritual Slaughter Dead bird meat oxidative stability |
title_short |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
title_full |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Quality and Safety Attributes of Slaughtered Versus Dead Chicken Birds Meat |
author |
Sohaib,M |
author_facet |
Sohaib,M Zafar,MS Arshad,MS Nauman,K Malhi,IY |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zafar,MS Arshad,MS Nauman,K Malhi,IY |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sohaib,M Zafar,MS Arshad,MS Nauman,K Malhi,IY |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Food Safety Ritual Slaughter Dead bird meat oxidative stability |
topic |
Food Safety Ritual Slaughter Dead bird meat oxidative stability |
description |
ABSTRACT The adulteration of dead chicken meat with halal meat is a concern in Pakistan that can harm safety of meat as well as religious beliefs of the Muslims. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to evaluate slaughtering methods (Islamic and decapitation) with dead chicken meat on composition, quality and safety attributes. Purposely, (n=24) birds were slaughtered and (n=12) dead birds samples were collected and subjected to proximate, mineral and quality analysis including pH, color (L*, a*, b*), cooking loss, texture, as well as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), peroxide value (PV), haem and non-haem iron. The results indicated ash content, minerals and oxidation parameters including TBARS, PV affected significantly (p<0.05). The highest Iron (Fe) and Magnesium (Mg) levels reported in dead bird meat were 14.21±0.99 and 959.62±2.11 whereas, the lowest in halal slaughtered bird’s meat were 10.09±1.10 and 870.48±2.11, respectively. However, Manganese (Mn) was only detected in halal slaughtered bird meat. Likewise, pH of dead chicken meat was lowest among treatments however, L* was highest in halal slaughtered bird meat. Additionally, the lowest lipid oxidation and haem iron values reported in halal slaughtered meat were 0.32±0.02 and 2.32±0.21, lower than in decapitated and dead bird meat. Our findings draw lines between slaughtering methods and mineral analysis could be used for the differentiation of halal slaughtered meats with dead chicken meat. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000200307 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000200307 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.22 n.2 2020 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA) instacron:FACTA |
instname_str |
Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA) |
instacron_str |
FACTA |
institution |
FACTA |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rvfacta@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1754122515272171520 |