Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Cleyton Washington da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Almeida,Glaudson Pereira, Paiva,Luciana Vieira de, França,Leonardo Fernandes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biota Neotropica
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032013000100016
Resumo: The accuracy of artificial nests in representing natural patterns of nest predation has been widely studied in temperate regions and egg size is one of the most tested sources of bias. In the neotropics, experiments with artificial nests usually used larger than natural eggs, despite suggestions in literature that the eggs should be similar to those of the local species. Here, we tested the hypothesis of spatial-temporal variation in predation risk of artificial nests in relation to egg size. We used quail (Coturnix coturnix; large), Chestnut-bellied Seed-finch (Oryzoborus angolensis; small) and plasticine (both sizes) eggs placed in artificial nests. We analyzed daily nest survival using models in the Program MARK. The best-fit model included the effects of egg size and the reproductive period on daily survival of artificial nests. Nests with large eggs had greater Daily Survival Estimates (DSE) than nests with small eggs during two times and DSE were smaller early in the reproductive period. DSE of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.91 (0.87 to 0.93) were recorded for large eggs at the beginning and end periods compared to 0.72 (0.65 to 0.78) and 0.84 (0.79 to 0.88) for small eggs. Birds were more important predators (40% of records) than mammals and reptiles based on signs left on the plasticine eggs. Our results support the hypothesis that larger eggs are less depredated than small ones in artificial bird nests, even when main predators (birds) are different from those commonly observed in the Neotropics (mammals and reptiles). However, controlling the egg size in experiments with artificial nests may not be sufficient to obtain similar time patterns observed in natural nests studied in the Cerrado.
id FAPESP-1_35126de55e22e9d8c2430e4a0612d49a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1676-06032013000100016
network_acronym_str FAPESP-1
network_name_str Biota Neotropica
repository_id_str
spelling Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg sizebirdCerradoneotropical savannanest successreproductionThe accuracy of artificial nests in representing natural patterns of nest predation has been widely studied in temperate regions and egg size is one of the most tested sources of bias. In the neotropics, experiments with artificial nests usually used larger than natural eggs, despite suggestions in literature that the eggs should be similar to those of the local species. Here, we tested the hypothesis of spatial-temporal variation in predation risk of artificial nests in relation to egg size. We used quail (Coturnix coturnix; large), Chestnut-bellied Seed-finch (Oryzoborus angolensis; small) and plasticine (both sizes) eggs placed in artificial nests. We analyzed daily nest survival using models in the Program MARK. The best-fit model included the effects of egg size and the reproductive period on daily survival of artificial nests. Nests with large eggs had greater Daily Survival Estimates (DSE) than nests with small eggs during two times and DSE were smaller early in the reproductive period. DSE of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.91 (0.87 to 0.93) were recorded for large eggs at the beginning and end periods compared to 0.72 (0.65 to 0.78) and 0.84 (0.79 to 0.88) for small eggs. Birds were more important predators (40% of records) than mammals and reptiles based on signs left on the plasticine eggs. Our results support the hypothesis that larger eggs are less depredated than small ones in artificial bird nests, even when main predators (birds) are different from those commonly observed in the Neotropics (mammals and reptiles). However, controlling the egg size in experiments with artificial nests may not be sufficient to obtain similar time patterns observed in natural nests studied in the Cerrado.Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032013000100016Biota Neotropica v.13 n.1 2013reponame:Biota Neotropicainstname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP10.1590/S1676-06032013000100016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Cleyton Washington da SilvaAlmeida,Glaudson PereiraPaiva,Luciana Vieira deFrança,Leonardo Fernandeseng2013-05-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-06032013000100016Revistahttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v20n1/pt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||juliosa@unifap.br1676-06111676-0611opendoar:2013-05-07T00:00Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
title Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
spellingShingle Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
Oliveira,Cleyton Washington da Silva
bird
Cerrado
neotropical savanna
nest success
reproduction
title_short Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
title_full Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
title_fullStr Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
title_full_unstemmed Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
title_sort Predation on artificial nests in open habitats of central Brazil: effects of time and egg size
author Oliveira,Cleyton Washington da Silva
author_facet Oliveira,Cleyton Washington da Silva
Almeida,Glaudson Pereira
Paiva,Luciana Vieira de
França,Leonardo Fernandes
author_role author
author2 Almeida,Glaudson Pereira
Paiva,Luciana Vieira de
França,Leonardo Fernandes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Cleyton Washington da Silva
Almeida,Glaudson Pereira
Paiva,Luciana Vieira de
França,Leonardo Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bird
Cerrado
neotropical savanna
nest success
reproduction
topic bird
Cerrado
neotropical savanna
nest success
reproduction
description The accuracy of artificial nests in representing natural patterns of nest predation has been widely studied in temperate regions and egg size is one of the most tested sources of bias. In the neotropics, experiments with artificial nests usually used larger than natural eggs, despite suggestions in literature that the eggs should be similar to those of the local species. Here, we tested the hypothesis of spatial-temporal variation in predation risk of artificial nests in relation to egg size. We used quail (Coturnix coturnix; large), Chestnut-bellied Seed-finch (Oryzoborus angolensis; small) and plasticine (both sizes) eggs placed in artificial nests. We analyzed daily nest survival using models in the Program MARK. The best-fit model included the effects of egg size and the reproductive period on daily survival of artificial nests. Nests with large eggs had greater Daily Survival Estimates (DSE) than nests with small eggs during two times and DSE were smaller early in the reproductive period. DSE of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.91 (0.87 to 0.93) were recorded for large eggs at the beginning and end periods compared to 0.72 (0.65 to 0.78) and 0.84 (0.79 to 0.88) for small eggs. Birds were more important predators (40% of records) than mammals and reptiles based on signs left on the plasticine eggs. Our results support the hypothesis that larger eggs are less depredated than small ones in artificial bird nests, even when main predators (birds) are different from those commonly observed in the Neotropics (mammals and reptiles). However, controlling the egg size in experiments with artificial nests may not be sufficient to obtain similar time patterns observed in natural nests studied in the Cerrado.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032013000100016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032013000100016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1676-06032013000100016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biota Neotropica v.13 n.1 2013
reponame:Biota Neotropica
instname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP
instname_str Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
instacron_str BIOTA - FAPESP
institution BIOTA - FAPESP
reponame_str Biota Neotropica
collection Biota Neotropica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||juliosa@unifap.br
_version_ 1754575899113553920