IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688 |
Resumo: | Brazilian financial institutions that have an Audit Committee and/or are listed on the Stock Exchange are obliged to disclose their financial statements in Bacen GAAP and IFRS. This study compares their relevanceusing the Ohlson Model (1995) adding control variables for the years 2010 to 2018. Two models were estimated, one for each set of standards, and the analysis of relevance was based on the R2 values. The results were consistent with the expectations and they suggest that IFRS information (EPS and BVPS) is more value relevant to the investor when making investment decisions, suggesting a positive effect in the adoption of IFRS for Brazil. On the other hand, equity has a higher explanatory power than profit. Thus, as the disclosure of information is not necessarily simultaneous in Bacen and IFRS, although there is an influence of Bacen’s previous information in IFRS price, the results show an incremental information contained in IFRS information. All results show the positive effect of adopting international accounting standards, which is an information aimed at the investor. It seems that the central bank has already has already recognized the positive effect. After all, from in was the CMN Resolution No. 4818 which instituted the IFRS model as the only accounting standard for consolidated statements from 2021 onwards, while Bacen standard will be restricted to individual statements. |
id |
FBS-1_160de2e7ff72df20f3494256ef85bac4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/688 |
network_acronym_str |
FBS-1 |
network_name_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial InstitutionsIFRS X Bacen Gaap: Value Relevance das Informações Contábeis das Instituições Financeiras do BrasilValue relevanceIFRSBacen GAAPValue relevanceIFRSBacen GAAPBrazilian financial institutions that have an Audit Committee and/or are listed on the Stock Exchange are obliged to disclose their financial statements in Bacen GAAP and IFRS. This study compares their relevanceusing the Ohlson Model (1995) adding control variables for the years 2010 to 2018. Two models were estimated, one for each set of standards, and the analysis of relevance was based on the R2 values. The results were consistent with the expectations and they suggest that IFRS information (EPS and BVPS) is more value relevant to the investor when making investment decisions, suggesting a positive effect in the adoption of IFRS for Brazil. On the other hand, equity has a higher explanatory power than profit. Thus, as the disclosure of information is not necessarily simultaneous in Bacen and IFRS, although there is an influence of Bacen’s previous information in IFRS price, the results show an incremental information contained in IFRS information. All results show the positive effect of adopting international accounting standards, which is an information aimed at the investor. It seems that the central bank has already has already recognized the positive effect. After all, from in was the CMN Resolution No. 4818 which instituted the IFRS model as the only accounting standard for consolidated statements from 2021 onwards, while Bacen standard will be restricted to individual statements.As instituições financeiras brasileiras que possuem um Comitê de Auditoria e / ou estão listadas em Bolsa de Valores são obrigadas a divulgar as demonstrações financeiras em Bacen GAAP e IFRS. Esta pesquisa compara a relevância deles utilizando o Modelo de Ohlson (1995), adicionando variáveis de controle para os anos de 2010 a 2018. Foram estimados dois modelos, um para cada conjunto de padrões, e a análise de relevância foi baseada nos valores de R2. Os resultados foram consistentes com as expectativas e sugerem que as informações em IFRS (EPS e BVPS) são mais relevantes para o investidor na tomada de decisões de investimento, sugerindo um efeito positivo na adoção do IFRS para o Brasil. Por outro lado, o patrimônio líquido tem maior poder explicativo do que o lucro. Assim, como a divulgação de informações não é necessariamente simultânea no Bacen e IFRS, embora haja influência das informações anteriores do Bacen no preço IFRS, os resultados mostram uma informação incremental contida nas informações IFRS. Todos os resultados mostram o efeito positivo da adoção das normas internacionais de contabilidade, que é uma informação voltada para o investidor. Parece que o Banco Central já reconheceu o efeito positivo, afinal, a partir da Resolução CMN nº 4.818 foi instituído o modelo IFRS como único padrão contábil para as demonstrações consolidadas a partir de 2021, enquanto a norma do Bacen ficará restrita às demonstrações individuais .FUCAPE Business Shool2022-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/68810.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.1Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): January to February 2022; 1-18Brazilian Business Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2022; 1-181808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1032http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1033Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Reviewhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, MarianaDalmacio, FláviaRezende, Amaury2022-05-02T19:28:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/688Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2022-05-02T19:28:23BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions IFRS X Bacen Gaap: Value Relevance das Informações Contábeis das Instituições Financeiras do Brasil |
title |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions |
spellingShingle |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions Marques, Mariana Value relevance IFRS Bacen GAAP Value relevance IFRS Bacen GAAP |
title_short |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions |
title_full |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions |
title_fullStr |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions |
title_full_unstemmed |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions |
title_sort |
IFRS vs Bacen Gaap: Accounting Information’s Value Relevance of the Brazilian Financial Institutions |
author |
Marques, Mariana |
author_facet |
Marques, Mariana Dalmacio, Flávia Rezende, Amaury |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dalmacio, Flávia Rezende, Amaury |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Mariana Dalmacio, Flávia Rezende, Amaury |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Value relevance IFRS Bacen GAAP Value relevance IFRS Bacen GAAP |
topic |
Value relevance IFRS Bacen GAAP Value relevance IFRS Bacen GAAP |
description |
Brazilian financial institutions that have an Audit Committee and/or are listed on the Stock Exchange are obliged to disclose their financial statements in Bacen GAAP and IFRS. This study compares their relevanceusing the Ohlson Model (1995) adding control variables for the years 2010 to 2018. Two models were estimated, one for each set of standards, and the analysis of relevance was based on the R2 values. The results were consistent with the expectations and they suggest that IFRS information (EPS and BVPS) is more value relevant to the investor when making investment decisions, suggesting a positive effect in the adoption of IFRS for Brazil. On the other hand, equity has a higher explanatory power than profit. Thus, as the disclosure of information is not necessarily simultaneous in Bacen and IFRS, although there is an influence of Bacen’s previous information in IFRS price, the results show an incremental information contained in IFRS information. All results show the positive effect of adopting international accounting standards, which is an information aimed at the investor. It seems that the central bank has already has already recognized the positive effect. After all, from in was the CMN Resolution No. 4818 which instituted the IFRS model as the only accounting standard for consolidated statements from 2021 onwards, while Bacen standard will be restricted to individual statements. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artigo revisado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688 10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.1 |
url |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.1 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1032 http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/688/1033 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Review http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Business Review http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): January to February 2022; 1-18 Brazilian Business Review; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2022; 1-18 1808-2386 1807-734X reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) instname:Fucape Business School (FBS) instacron:FBS |
instname_str |
Fucape Business School (FBS) |
instacron_str |
FBS |
institution |
FBS |
reponame_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
collection |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br |
_version_ |
1754732239747284992 |