State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coutinho, Diogo R.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo, Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428
Resumo: This article revisits the trajectory of state-owned enterprises in Brazil to better understand their nature, their mission and the contemporary dilemmas they face. Based on a political economy approach, it provides a critical analysis of the crystal- ized public services versus economic activity dichotomy as a constitutive element of the state-owned enterprises legal regime, and also seeks to investigate whether Law n. 13.303/2016 overcomes such dichotomy, creating at the same time new dilemmas, challenges and “side effects”. It concludes that the Brazilian Supreme Court and the new statute have not adequately reflected changes through which state-owned companies have gone, perpetuating a mismatch between law and the political economy environment. The Supreme Court defers to a consolidated view, not adequately reflecting the “metamorphoses” gone through by the state-owned enterprises. With this respect, Law n. 13.303/2016 has its strengths and weakness- es. It is right by stating that it applies to both entities delivering public services and to those carrying other economic activities. However, since it fails to clearly relin- quish the dichotomy at stake, the path for the Supreme Court to perpetuate its con- solidated case law remains open. Moreover, the new statute it is currently subject of a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality, which may also limit its effectiveness
id FGV-2_935eec52dcad2792bc42b3e092948a78
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/79428
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activitiesEmpresas estatais entre serviços públicos e atividades econômicasState-owned enterprisesPolitical economyPublic servicesEconomic activityLaw n. 13.303/2016Empresas estataisEconomia políticaServiços públicosAtividade econômicaLei n. 13.303/2016This article revisits the trajectory of state-owned enterprises in Brazil to better understand their nature, their mission and the contemporary dilemmas they face. Based on a political economy approach, it provides a critical analysis of the crystal- ized public services versus economic activity dichotomy as a constitutive element of the state-owned enterprises legal regime, and also seeks to investigate whether Law n. 13.303/2016 overcomes such dichotomy, creating at the same time new dilemmas, challenges and “side effects”. It concludes that the Brazilian Supreme Court and the new statute have not adequately reflected changes through which state-owned companies have gone, perpetuating a mismatch between law and the political economy environment. The Supreme Court defers to a consolidated view, not adequately reflecting the “metamorphoses” gone through by the state-owned enterprises. With this respect, Law n. 13.303/2016 has its strengths and weakness- es. It is right by stating that it applies to both entities delivering public services and to those carrying other economic activities. However, since it fails to clearly relin- quish the dichotomy at stake, the path for the Supreme Court to perpetuate its con- solidated case law remains open. Moreover, the new statute it is currently subject of a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality, which may also limit its effectivenessO artigo revisita a trajetória das empresas estatais no Brasil desde meados do século XX para melhor compreender sua natureza, sua missão e seus dilemas jurídicos contemporâneos. A partir de uma abordagem de economia política, analisa criticamente a consolidação da dicotomia serviço público versus atividade econômica como elemento constitutivo do regime jurídico das estatais e procura, ainda, investigar em que medida a Lei n. 13.303/2016 enfrenta e supera tal dicotomia, criando, ao mesmo tempo, novos dilemas, desafios e “efeitos colaterais”. O texto conclui que nem essa nova lei, nem o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) refletiram adequadamente as mudanças experimentadas pelas estatais, perpetuando o descompasso entre o direito e o plano da economia política em que estão inseridas. O STF chancela uma interpretação consolidada do regime jurídico aplicável às estatais, não refletindo adequadamente suas “metamorfoses”. Neste ponto, a nova lei acerta, mas também erra: acerta ao não diferenciar estatais prestadoras de serviço público de estatais destinadas a outras atividades econômicas. Erra, porém, por não tratar de forma específica da dicotomia aqui discutida, o que terminará por reforçar as interpretações do próprio STF. Além disso, a lei é, no momento, objeto de uma Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI), o que também pode limitar sua eficácia.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2019-06-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902Revista Direito GV; v. 15 n. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e19022317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428/75985Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoutinho, Diogo R.Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de MeloNasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita2019-07-12T17:26:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/79428Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-07-12T17:26:21Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
Empresas estatais entre serviços públicos e atividades econômicas
title State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
spellingShingle State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
Coutinho, Diogo R.
State-owned enterprises
Political economy
Public services
Economic activity
Law n. 13.303/2016
Empresas estatais
Economia política
Serviços públicos
Atividade econômica
Lei n. 13.303/2016
title_short State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
title_full State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
title_fullStr State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
title_full_unstemmed State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
title_sort State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
author Coutinho, Diogo R.
author_facet Coutinho, Diogo R.
Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo
Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita
author_role author
author2 Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo
Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coutinho, Diogo R.
Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo
Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv State-owned enterprises
Political economy
Public services
Economic activity
Law n. 13.303/2016
Empresas estatais
Economia política
Serviços públicos
Atividade econômica
Lei n. 13.303/2016
topic State-owned enterprises
Political economy
Public services
Economic activity
Law n. 13.303/2016
Empresas estatais
Economia política
Serviços públicos
Atividade econômica
Lei n. 13.303/2016
description This article revisits the trajectory of state-owned enterprises in Brazil to better understand their nature, their mission and the contemporary dilemmas they face. Based on a political economy approach, it provides a critical analysis of the crystal- ized public services versus economic activity dichotomy as a constitutive element of the state-owned enterprises legal regime, and also seeks to investigate whether Law n. 13.303/2016 overcomes such dichotomy, creating at the same time new dilemmas, challenges and “side effects”. It concludes that the Brazilian Supreme Court and the new statute have not adequately reflected changes through which state-owned companies have gone, perpetuating a mismatch between law and the political economy environment. The Supreme Court defers to a consolidated view, not adequately reflecting the “metamorphoses” gone through by the state-owned enterprises. With this respect, Law n. 13.303/2016 has its strengths and weakness- es. It is right by stating that it applies to both entities delivering public services and to those carrying other economic activities. However, since it fails to clearly relin- quish the dichotomy at stake, the path for the Supreme Court to perpetuate its con- solidated case law remains open. Moreover, the new statute it is currently subject of a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality, which may also limit its effectiveness
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428/75985
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902
Revista Direito GV; v. 15 n. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943710232182784