State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428 |
Resumo: | This article revisits the trajectory of state-owned enterprises in Brazil to better understand their nature, their mission and the contemporary dilemmas they face. Based on a political economy approach, it provides a critical analysis of the crystal- ized public services versus economic activity dichotomy as a constitutive element of the state-owned enterprises legal regime, and also seeks to investigate whether Law n. 13.303/2016 overcomes such dichotomy, creating at the same time new dilemmas, challenges and “side effects”. It concludes that the Brazilian Supreme Court and the new statute have not adequately reflected changes through which state-owned companies have gone, perpetuating a mismatch between law and the political economy environment. The Supreme Court defers to a consolidated view, not adequately reflecting the “metamorphoses” gone through by the state-owned enterprises. With this respect, Law n. 13.303/2016 has its strengths and weakness- es. It is right by stating that it applies to both entities delivering public services and to those carrying other economic activities. However, since it fails to clearly relin- quish the dichotomy at stake, the path for the Supreme Court to perpetuate its con- solidated case law remains open. Moreover, the new statute it is currently subject of a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality, which may also limit its effectiveness |
id |
FGV-2_935eec52dcad2792bc42b3e092948a78 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/79428 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activitiesEmpresas estatais entre serviços públicos e atividades econômicasState-owned enterprisesPolitical economyPublic servicesEconomic activityLaw n. 13.303/2016Empresas estataisEconomia políticaServiços públicosAtividade econômicaLei n. 13.303/2016This article revisits the trajectory of state-owned enterprises in Brazil to better understand their nature, their mission and the contemporary dilemmas they face. Based on a political economy approach, it provides a critical analysis of the crystal- ized public services versus economic activity dichotomy as a constitutive element of the state-owned enterprises legal regime, and also seeks to investigate whether Law n. 13.303/2016 overcomes such dichotomy, creating at the same time new dilemmas, challenges and “side effects”. It concludes that the Brazilian Supreme Court and the new statute have not adequately reflected changes through which state-owned companies have gone, perpetuating a mismatch between law and the political economy environment. The Supreme Court defers to a consolidated view, not adequately reflecting the “metamorphoses” gone through by the state-owned enterprises. With this respect, Law n. 13.303/2016 has its strengths and weakness- es. It is right by stating that it applies to both entities delivering public services and to those carrying other economic activities. However, since it fails to clearly relin- quish the dichotomy at stake, the path for the Supreme Court to perpetuate its con- solidated case law remains open. Moreover, the new statute it is currently subject of a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality, which may also limit its effectivenessO artigo revisita a trajetória das empresas estatais no Brasil desde meados do século XX para melhor compreender sua natureza, sua missão e seus dilemas jurídicos contemporâneos. A partir de uma abordagem de economia política, analisa criticamente a consolidação da dicotomia serviço público versus atividade econômica como elemento constitutivo do regime jurídico das estatais e procura, ainda, investigar em que medida a Lei n. 13.303/2016 enfrenta e supera tal dicotomia, criando, ao mesmo tempo, novos dilemas, desafios e “efeitos colaterais”. O texto conclui que nem essa nova lei, nem o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) refletiram adequadamente as mudanças experimentadas pelas estatais, perpetuando o descompasso entre o direito e o plano da economia política em que estão inseridas. O STF chancela uma interpretação consolidada do regime jurídico aplicável às estatais, não refletindo adequadamente suas “metamorfoses”. Neste ponto, a nova lei acerta, mas também erra: acerta ao não diferenciar estatais prestadoras de serviço público de estatais destinadas a outras atividades econômicas. Erra, porém, por não tratar de forma específica da dicotomia aqui discutida, o que terminará por reforçar as interpretações do próprio STF. Além disso, a lei é, no momento, objeto de uma Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI), o que também pode limitar sua eficácia.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2019-06-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902Revista Direito GV; v. 15 n. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e19022317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428/75985Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoutinho, Diogo R.Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de MeloNasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita2019-07-12T17:26:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/79428Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-07-12T17:26:21Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities Empresas estatais entre serviços públicos e atividades econômicas |
title |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities |
spellingShingle |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities Coutinho, Diogo R. State-owned enterprises Political economy Public services Economic activity Law n. 13.303/2016 Empresas estatais Economia política Serviços públicos Atividade econômica Lei n. 13.303/2016 |
title_short |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities |
title_full |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities |
title_fullStr |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities |
title_full_unstemmed |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities |
title_sort |
State-owned enterprises between public services and economic activities |
author |
Coutinho, Diogo R. |
author_facet |
Coutinho, Diogo R. Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coutinho, Diogo R. Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira de Melo Nasser, Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
State-owned enterprises Political economy Public services Economic activity Law n. 13.303/2016 Empresas estatais Economia política Serviços públicos Atividade econômica Lei n. 13.303/2016 |
topic |
State-owned enterprises Political economy Public services Economic activity Law n. 13.303/2016 Empresas estatais Economia política Serviços públicos Atividade econômica Lei n. 13.303/2016 |
description |
This article revisits the trajectory of state-owned enterprises in Brazil to better understand their nature, their mission and the contemporary dilemmas they face. Based on a political economy approach, it provides a critical analysis of the crystal- ized public services versus economic activity dichotomy as a constitutive element of the state-owned enterprises legal regime, and also seeks to investigate whether Law n. 13.303/2016 overcomes such dichotomy, creating at the same time new dilemmas, challenges and “side effects”. It concludes that the Brazilian Supreme Court and the new statute have not adequately reflected changes through which state-owned companies have gone, perpetuating a mismatch between law and the political economy environment. The Supreme Court defers to a consolidated view, not adequately reflecting the “metamorphoses” gone through by the state-owned enterprises. With this respect, Law n. 13.303/2016 has its strengths and weakness- es. It is right by stating that it applies to both entities delivering public services and to those carrying other economic activities. However, since it fails to clearly relin- quish the dichotomy at stake, the path for the Supreme Court to perpetuate its con- solidated case law remains open. Moreover, the new statute it is currently subject of a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality, which may also limit its effectiveness |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/79428/75985 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GV info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GV |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902 Revista Direito GV; v. 15 n. 1 (2019): jan-abr. (32); e1902 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943710232182784 |