Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Acunha, Fernando José Gonçalves
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/66589
Resumo: The State and its territory are fundamental institutions of modern Law. Nevertheless, these elements aren’t as important as they have been, and this transformation has allowed that conflicts of fundamental rights start affecting distinct legal orders (international, transnational and national) simultaneously. Issues like the democratic legitimization of Law, its spatial efficacy and the compatibility of legal orders have become a core piece of legal studies. This article intends to explore some legal operational problems through the examination of decisions whose subject is the “right to oblivion” as it has been affirmed by Courts in Europe and in Brazil. For that reason, it analyzes how these legal orders and their Courts have been defining the depth and the scope of this “right” and also the way in which they have settled the spatial efficacy of their rulings. Its aim is to address the problematic dialogue between legal orders and the concerns raised by the replacement of the legitimacy of Law, progressively detached from democracy in order to become more related to the rationality of juridical norms. In conclusion, the paper defends democracy as an unreplaceable basis for Law, though it doesn’t propose a return to classical Modernity standards.
id FGV-2_c3e9547bf6aa7d5980a649e1914cb9a3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/66589
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical ordersDemocracia e transconstitucionalismo: “direito ao esquecimento”, extraterritorialidade e conflito entre ordens jurídicasTransconstitutionalismDemocracyFundamental rightsRight to oblivionFree speechTransconstitucionalismoDemocraciaDireitos fundamentaisDireito ao esquecimentoLiberdade de expressãoThe State and its territory are fundamental institutions of modern Law. Nevertheless, these elements aren’t as important as they have been, and this transformation has allowed that conflicts of fundamental rights start affecting distinct legal orders (international, transnational and national) simultaneously. Issues like the democratic legitimization of Law, its spatial efficacy and the compatibility of legal orders have become a core piece of legal studies. This article intends to explore some legal operational problems through the examination of decisions whose subject is the “right to oblivion” as it has been affirmed by Courts in Europe and in Brazil. For that reason, it analyzes how these legal orders and their Courts have been defining the depth and the scope of this “right” and also the way in which they have settled the spatial efficacy of their rulings. Its aim is to address the problematic dialogue between legal orders and the concerns raised by the replacement of the legitimacy of Law, progressively detached from democracy in order to become more related to the rationality of juridical norms. In conclusion, the paper defends democracy as an unreplaceable basis for Law, though it doesn’t propose a return to classical Modernity standards.Estado e território são pilares fundamentais do Direito moderno. Todavia, a progressiva perda de centralidade desses elementos caracteriza-se como uma transformação que tem feito com que conflitos de direitos humanos e fundamentais passem a implicar simultaneamente ordens jurídicas de diversos níveis (internacional, transnacional e nacional). Nessa linha, temas como a legitimação democrática do Direito, sua eficácia espacial e a compatibilidade entre ordens jurídicas passam a ser objeto importante de diversos estudos jurídicos. Este artigo, partindo do exame do caso do “direito ao esquecimento”, na forma como definido por tribunais na Europa e no Brasil, pretende expor essas dificuldades operacionais do Direito. Para tanto, examina-se a forma como os ordenamentos implicados e seus tribunais delimitaram esse direito e a eficácia espacial de suas decisões, abordando-se a problemática que envolve o diálogo entre ordens jurídicas e as dificuldades suscitadas pelo deslocamento da legitimidade do Direito da democracia para a racionalidade de suas normas. Em conclusão, defende-se a impossibilidade de substituição da democracia como fundamento do Direito, sem, contudo, propor um retorno aos padrões jurídicos clássicos modernos.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2016-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/66589Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2016): set-dez. (25); 748-775Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2016): set-dez. (25); 748-775Revista Direito GV; v. 12 n. 3 (2016): set-dez. (25); 748-7752317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/66589/64210Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcunha, Fernando José Gonçalves2019-08-14T14:15:38Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/66589Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-08-14T14:15:38Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
Democracia e transconstitucionalismo: “direito ao esquecimento”, extraterritorialidade e conflito entre ordens jurídicas
title Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
spellingShingle Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
Acunha, Fernando José Gonçalves
Transconstitutionalism
Democracy
Fundamental rights
Right to oblivion
Free speech
Transconstitucionalismo
Democracia
Direitos fundamentais
Direito ao esquecimento
Liberdade de expressão
title_short Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
title_full Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
title_fullStr Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
title_full_unstemmed Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
title_sort Democracy and transconstitutionalism: the “right to oblivion”, extraterritoriality and the conflict between juridical orders
author Acunha, Fernando José Gonçalves
author_facet Acunha, Fernando José Gonçalves
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Acunha, Fernando José Gonçalves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transconstitutionalism
Democracy
Fundamental rights
Right to oblivion
Free speech
Transconstitucionalismo
Democracia
Direitos fundamentais
Direito ao esquecimento
Liberdade de expressão
topic Transconstitutionalism
Democracy
Fundamental rights
Right to oblivion
Free speech
Transconstitucionalismo
Democracia
Direitos fundamentais
Direito ao esquecimento
Liberdade de expressão
description The State and its territory are fundamental institutions of modern Law. Nevertheless, these elements aren’t as important as they have been, and this transformation has allowed that conflicts of fundamental rights start affecting distinct legal orders (international, transnational and national) simultaneously. Issues like the democratic legitimization of Law, its spatial efficacy and the compatibility of legal orders have become a core piece of legal studies. This article intends to explore some legal operational problems through the examination of decisions whose subject is the “right to oblivion” as it has been affirmed by Courts in Europe and in Brazil. For that reason, it analyzes how these legal orders and their Courts have been defining the depth and the scope of this “right” and also the way in which they have settled the spatial efficacy of their rulings. Its aim is to address the problematic dialogue between legal orders and the concerns raised by the replacement of the legitimacy of Law, progressively detached from democracy in order to become more related to the rationality of juridical norms. In conclusion, the paper defends democracy as an unreplaceable basis for Law, though it doesn’t propose a return to classical Modernity standards.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/66589
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/66589
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/66589/64210
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Direito GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Direito GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2016): set-dez. (25); 748-775
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2016): set-dez. (25); 748-775
Revista Direito GV; v. 12 n. 3 (2016): set-dez. (25); 748-775
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943709766615040