Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Klein, Fabio Alvim
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6926
Resumo: This article tests the presence of political budget cycle (PBC) in municipal elections in Brazil and checks whether mayors who adopt such policy have greater probability of reelection. Based on fiscal and electoral data of 5,406 Brazilian municipalities and applying the difference-in-differences econometric method as well as logistic regressions, the results provide some evidence of PBC in Brazil, although its magnitude and consistency varies depending on the years used as electoral and non-electoral years. On average, reelectable mayors spend close to 3% more in election years than nonreelectables. Moreover, reelectables who do run for reelection present a variation in spending which is close to 5% superior to that of non-reelectables and non-runners. Additionally, the results suggest that mayors who increase public spending during electoral periods have greater chances of being reelected, as long as such spending is done within deficit limits acceptable by voters.
id FGV-4_248d7c9e14ee28ae66a1a16e390cba11
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6926
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from BrazilIncentivos da reeleição e ciclo político-orçamentário: evidência do Brasilelections and votinglocal public spendingBrazil.eleições e votogasto público localBrasil.This article tests the presence of political budget cycle (PBC) in municipal elections in Brazil and checks whether mayors who adopt such policy have greater probability of reelection. Based on fiscal and electoral data of 5,406 Brazilian municipalities and applying the difference-in-differences econometric method as well as logistic regressions, the results provide some evidence of PBC in Brazil, although its magnitude and consistency varies depending on the years used as electoral and non-electoral years. On average, reelectable mayors spend close to 3% more in election years than nonreelectables. Moreover, reelectables who do run for reelection present a variation in spending which is close to 5% superior to that of non-reelectables and non-runners. Additionally, the results suggest that mayors who increase public spending during electoral periods have greater chances of being reelected, as long as such spending is done within deficit limits acceptable by voters.Este artigo testa a presença de ciclo político-orçamentário (CPO) nas eleições municipaisno Brasil e checa se prefeitos que adotam tal política têm maiores chancesde reeleição. Baseado em dados eleitorais e fiscais de 5.406 municípios brasileiros eaplicando o método econométrico de diferença-em-diferenças e também regressõeslogísticas, os resultados fornecem alguma evidência de CPO no Brasil, apesar de suamagnitude e consistência variar dependendo dos anos utilizados como anos eleitoraise não eleitorais. Em média, prefeitos reelegíveis gastam em torno de 3% a mais emanos eleitorais em comparação a prefeitos não reelegíveis. Indo além, reelegíveisque de fato concorrem à reeleição apresentam uma variação no gasto que é quase5% superior à variação dos não reelegíveis e não concorrentes. Adicionalmente, osresultados sugerem que prefeitos que aumentam os gastos em anos eleitorais têmmaiores chances de reeleição, contanto que tal aumento seja feito dentro de limitesde déficit aceitáveis pelos eleitores.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2010-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6926Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2010); 283 a 337Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2010); 283 a 337Revista de Administração Pública; v. 44 n. 2 (2010); 283 a 3371982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6926/5493Klein, Fabio Alviminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:50:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6926Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:50:05Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
Incentivos da reeleição e ciclo político-orçamentário: evidência do Brasil
title Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
spellingShingle Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
Klein, Fabio Alvim
elections and voting
local public spending
Brazil.
eleições e voto
gasto público local
Brasil.
title_short Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
title_full Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
title_fullStr Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
title_sort Reelection incentives and political budget cycle: evidence from Brazil
author Klein, Fabio Alvim
author_facet Klein, Fabio Alvim
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Klein, Fabio Alvim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv elections and voting
local public spending
Brazil.
eleições e voto
gasto público local
Brasil.
topic elections and voting
local public spending
Brazil.
eleições e voto
gasto público local
Brasil.
description This article tests the presence of political budget cycle (PBC) in municipal elections in Brazil and checks whether mayors who adopt such policy have greater probability of reelection. Based on fiscal and electoral data of 5,406 Brazilian municipalities and applying the difference-in-differences econometric method as well as logistic regressions, the results provide some evidence of PBC in Brazil, although its magnitude and consistency varies depending on the years used as electoral and non-electoral years. On average, reelectable mayors spend close to 3% more in election years than nonreelectables. Moreover, reelectables who do run for reelection present a variation in spending which is close to 5% superior to that of non-reelectables and non-runners. Additionally, the results suggest that mayors who increase public spending during electoral periods have greater chances of being reelected, as long as such spending is done within deficit limits acceptable by voters.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6926
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6926
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6926/5493
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2010); 283 a 337
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2010); 283 a 337
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 44 n. 2 (2010); 283 a 337
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943765058027520