Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filho, Antonio Gelis
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6842
Resumo: This article develops a matrix model to assess the normative design of past and current regulatory institutions (economic autarchies of the ‘populist’ republic). Normative design is defined as a set of possibilities for an institution’s structure and actions which is limited by the legal norms that created it. The model is structured based on two main parameters: independence in relation to the central power and transparency in relation to society. Five hypothesis were tested, and the conclusion was that current regulatory institutions have heterogeneous designs and they differ from the former ones for being both more independent and more transparent, and the largest difference is in the second parameter.
id FGV-4_46bfce5173f42cecc1442e57d7a4d44c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6842
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutionsAnálise comparativa do desenho normativo de instituições reguladoras do presente e do passadoregulationregulatory institutionsnormative designtransparency.regulaçãoinstituições reguladorasdesenho normativotransparência.This article develops a matrix model to assess the normative design of past and current regulatory institutions (economic autarchies of the ‘populist’ republic). Normative design is defined as a set of possibilities for an institution’s structure and actions which is limited by the legal norms that created it. The model is structured based on two main parameters: independence in relation to the central power and transparency in relation to society. Five hypothesis were tested, and the conclusion was that current regulatory institutions have heterogeneous designs and they differ from the former ones for being both more independent and more transparent, and the largest difference is in the second parameter.Este artigo desenvolve um modelo matricial para avaliação do desenho normativo de instituições reguladoras do presente e do passado (autarquias econômicas da república “populista”). Desenho normativo é definido como o conjunto de possibilidades de estruturação e de atuação de uma instituição que é delimitado pelas normas jurídicas que a criaram. O modelo é estruturado a partir de dois parâmetros principais: independência em relação ao poder central e transparência em relação à sociedade. Foram testadas cinco hipóteses, concluindo-se que as instituições reguladoras do presente apresentam desenhos normativos heterogêneos e que se distinguem de instituições do passado tanto por maior independência quanto por maior transparência, sendo a diferença mais acentuada em relação ao segundo parâmetro.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6842Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2006); 589 a 614Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 40 Núm. 4 (2006); 589 a 614Revista de Administração Pública; v. 40 n. 4 (2006); 589 a 6141982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6842/5423Filho, Antonio Gelisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:55:44Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6842Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:55:44Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
Análise comparativa do desenho normativo de instituições reguladoras do presente e do passado
title Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
Filho, Antonio Gelis
regulation
regulatory institutions
normative design
transparency.
regulação
instituições reguladoras
desenho normativo
transparência.
title_short Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
title_full Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
title_sort Comparative analysis of the normative design of former and current regulatory institutions
author Filho, Antonio Gelis
author_facet Filho, Antonio Gelis
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filho, Antonio Gelis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv regulation
regulatory institutions
normative design
transparency.
regulação
instituições reguladoras
desenho normativo
transparência.
topic regulation
regulatory institutions
normative design
transparency.
regulação
instituições reguladoras
desenho normativo
transparência.
description This article develops a matrix model to assess the normative design of past and current regulatory institutions (economic autarchies of the ‘populist’ republic). Normative design is defined as a set of possibilities for an institution’s structure and actions which is limited by the legal norms that created it. The model is structured based on two main parameters: independence in relation to the central power and transparency in relation to society. Five hypothesis were tested, and the conclusion was that current regulatory institutions have heterogeneous designs and they differ from the former ones for being both more independent and more transparent, and the largest difference is in the second parameter.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6842
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6842
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6842/5423
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2006); 589 a 614
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 40 Núm. 4 (2006); 589 a 614
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 40 n. 4 (2006); 589 a 614
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943764933246976

Registros relacionados