The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Silva, Sueli Maria Goulart, Dourado, Débora, Régis, Helder Pontes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916
Resumo: With the process of maturing in Administration field as knowledge area, is verified the search of its consolidation in the scope of the social sciences. Considering the centrality of the methodological subject for the quality of the knowledge produced in the area of Organizational Theory, this work presents a critical revision of the methodology used in the article published in the annals of ENANPAD, in the period from 1999 to 2002. The main objective is to contribute with the discussions on methodological practices, especially in what it concerns the use of the case study as research strategy. The informations collected were subdivided in three groups contemplating the research design, the techniques of data collection and the dimensions and resources of data analysis. The main results of this study show the predominance of qualitative studies, a relative banality in the use of the case study strategy, the tendency to the objective dimensions, use of interpretative analysis methods, among others. This analysis suggests that the category of basic qualitative study can be used with advantage by the Brazilian researchers in the Administration area.
id FGV-9_b44a70aaca80f0b694c175ae37440131
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/4916
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternativesO Reinado dos Estudos de Caso em Teoria das Organizações: Imprecisões e AlternativasWith the process of maturing in Administration field as knowledge area, is verified the search of its consolidation in the scope of the social sciences. Considering the centrality of the methodological subject for the quality of the knowledge produced in the area of Organizational Theory, this work presents a critical revision of the methodology used in the article published in the annals of ENANPAD, in the period from 1999 to 2002. The main objective is to contribute with the discussions on methodological practices, especially in what it concerns the use of the case study as research strategy. The informations collected were subdivided in three groups contemplating the research design, the techniques of data collection and the dimensions and resources of data analysis. The main results of this study show the predominance of qualitative studies, a relative banality in the use of the case study strategy, the tendency to the objective dimensions, use of interpretative analysis methods, among others. This analysis suggests that the category of basic qualitative study can be used with advantage by the Brazilian researchers in the Administration area.Com o amadurecimento do campo da Administração como área de conhecimento, verifica-se a busca de sua consolidação no âmbito das ciências sociais. Considerando a centralidade da questão metodológica para a qualidade do conhecimento na área de Teoria das Organizações, este trabalho apresenta revisão crítica da metodologia utilizada nos trabalhos publicados nos anais do ENANPAD, de 1999 a 2002. O objetivo é contribuir com as discussões sobre práticas metodológicas, especialmente no que diz respeito ao uso do estudo de caso como estratégia de pesquisa. As informações coletadas foram subdivididas em três grupos contemplando o delineamento da pesquisa, as técnicas de coleta de dados e as dimensões e recursos de análise de dados. Os resultados deste estudo apontaram para predominância de estudos qualitativos, uma relativa banalização no uso da estratégia de estudo de caso, tendência à adoção de pressupostos objetivistas, utilização de métodos interpretativistas de análise, entre outros. Esta análise sugere que a categoria de estudo qualitativo básico pode ser utilizada com proveito pelos pesquisadores brasileiros na área de Administração.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2005-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2005)Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2005)Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 3 n. 2 (2005)1679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916/3650Mariz, Luiz Alberto da CostaSilva, Sueli Maria GoulartDourado, DéboraRégis, Helder Pontesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-10-10T17:03:32Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/4916Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:18.840314Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
O Reinado dos Estudos de Caso em Teoria das Organizações: Imprecisões e Alternativas
title The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
spellingShingle The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa
title_short The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
title_full The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
title_fullStr The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
title_full_unstemmed The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
title_sort The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives
author Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa
author_facet Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa
Silva, Sueli Maria Goulart
Dourado, Débora
Régis, Helder Pontes
author_role author
author2 Silva, Sueli Maria Goulart
Dourado, Débora
Régis, Helder Pontes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mariz, Luiz Alberto da Costa
Silva, Sueli Maria Goulart
Dourado, Débora
Régis, Helder Pontes
description With the process of maturing in Administration field as knowledge area, is verified the search of its consolidation in the scope of the social sciences. Considering the centrality of the methodological subject for the quality of the knowledge produced in the area of Organizational Theory, this work presents a critical revision of the methodology used in the article published in the annals of ENANPAD, in the period from 1999 to 2002. The main objective is to contribute with the discussions on methodological practices, especially in what it concerns the use of the case study as research strategy. The informations collected were subdivided in three groups contemplating the research design, the techniques of data collection and the dimensions and resources of data analysis. The main results of this study show the predominance of qualitative studies, a relative banality in the use of the case study strategy, the tendency to the objective dimensions, use of interpretative analysis methods, among others. This analysis suggests that the category of basic qualitative study can be used with advantage by the Brazilian researchers in the Administration area.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916/3650
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2005)
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2005)
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 3 n. 2 (2005)
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943206132416512