Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ortiz, Nancy Piedad Diaz
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Bandeira, Mariana Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15904
Resumo: The aim of this essay is to discuss that the Internal Social Responsibility discourse as a management model intends to homogenize the treatment of the internal actors of the organization, once it is used in an instrumental perspective focused exclusively in legal themes on the work relation, in opposition to a meaningful perspective focused on the humanization of the work environment. Consequently, organizations hide, under this discourse, practices truly dehumanizing in social life, and encourage, even more, intolerance to differences. This discussion takes place in Latin America, where it demands strength from intercultural discourses and the defense of the human rights in political and business agendas, what highlights the contradictions inherent to these discourses. From a bibliographic review oversocial responsibility, discourse, social identity theory and self-concept theory, the individual, social and organizational mechanisms of elaboration and overcome of stereotypes were discussed, as they help the person to establish references for the perceptions and interpretations of reality. It is discussed that the discourse of social internal responsibility could propose a change in the way that the persons are treated in the organization. In this context, difference would not as a way of social exclusion, but it would be a way to promote equity, giving value to characteristics of individual action in the organization and not in the sense of reinforce the difference between “us” and “them”, in function of the role that each one has in the organizational dynamic.
id FGV-9_c2412741bde56baa07133980fb6f9227
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/15904
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenarioResponsabilidad social interna: entre la diferencia y el discurso en el escenario organizacionalResponsabilidade social interna: entre a diferença e o discurso no cenário organizacionalThe aim of this essay is to discuss that the Internal Social Responsibility discourse as a management model intends to homogenize the treatment of the internal actors of the organization, once it is used in an instrumental perspective focused exclusively in legal themes on the work relation, in opposition to a meaningful perspective focused on the humanization of the work environment. Consequently, organizations hide, under this discourse, practices truly dehumanizing in social life, and encourage, even more, intolerance to differences. This discussion takes place in Latin America, where it demands strength from intercultural discourses and the defense of the human rights in political and business agendas, what highlights the contradictions inherent to these discourses. From a bibliographic review oversocial responsibility, discourse, social identity theory and self-concept theory, the individual, social and organizational mechanisms of elaboration and overcome of stereotypes were discussed, as they help the person to establish references for the perceptions and interpretations of reality. It is discussed that the discourse of social internal responsibility could propose a change in the way that the persons are treated in the organization. In this context, difference would not as a way of social exclusion, but it would be a way to promote equity, giving value to characteristics of individual action in the organization and not in the sense of reinforce the difference between “us” and “them”, in function of the role that each one has in the organizational dynamic.El ensayo plantea que el discurso de la Responsabilidad Social Interna, como modelo de gestión, pretende homogenizar el tratamiento de los actores internos de la organización, una vez que es utilizado desde una perspectiva instrumental enfocada exclusivamente en temas legales de la relación laboral, en contraposición a una perspectiva sustantiva centrada en la humanización del ambiente laboral. En consecuencia, bajo este discurso, las organizaciones esconden prácticas que son, en verdad, des-humanizantes en la convivencia social y fomentan aún más la intolerancia hacia la diferencia. La discusión se contextualiza en Latinoamérica, en que cobran fuerza los discursos de la interculturalidad y de la defensa de los derechos humanos en las agendas políticas y empresariales, lo que resalta las contradicciones inherentes a estos discursos. A partir de una revisión bibliográfica sobre responsabilidad social, discurso, teoría de la identidad social y del autoconcepto, se discutieron los mecanismos individuales, sociales y organizacionales de elaboración y superación de estereotipos, que ayudan al individuo a establecer referencias para las percepciones e interpretación de la realidad. Se cuestiona que el discurso de la responsabilidad social interna podría proponer un cambio en la forma como se tratan los individuos en la organización. En este contexto, la diferencia no existiría como forma de exclusión social, más bien sería un medio para promover la equidad, valorando las particularidades de la acción individual en la organización, y no en el sentido de reforzar la diferencia entre el “nosotros” y “ellos” en función del rol que se ejerce en la dinámica organizacional.Este ensaio propõe que o discurso da Responsabilidade Social Interna como modelo de gestão pretende homogeneizar o tratamento dos atores internos da organização, uma vez que ele é utilizado em uma perspectiva instrumental focada exclusivamente em temas legais da relação laboral, em contraposição a uma perspectiva substantiva centrada na humanização do ambiente laboral. Consequentemente, as organizações escondem, debaixo desse discurso, práticas verdadeiramente desumanizantes na convivência social e fomentam, cada vez mais, a intolerância à diferença. A discussão se contextualiza na América Latina, onde cobra forçados discursos da interculturalidade e da defesa dos direitos humanos nas agendas políticas e empresariais, o que evidencia as contradições inerentes a esses discursos. A partir de uma revisão bibliográfica sobre responsabilidade social, discurso, teoria da identidade social e do autoconceito, discutiram-se os mecanismos individuais, sociais e organizacionais de elaboração e superação de estereótipos, que ajudam o indivíduo a estabelecer referências para as percepções e interpretação da realidade. Questiona-se que o discurso da responsabilidade social interna poderia propor uma mudança na forma como se tratam os indivíduos na organização. Nesse contexto, a diferença não existiria como forma de exclusão social, mas seria um meio para promover a equidade, valorizando as particularidades da ação individual na organização, e não no sentido de reforçar a diferença entre “nós” e “eles” em função do papel que exerce cada um na dinâmica organizacional.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2015-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15904Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2015) - Latin American Critical Thought and Organizational Studies; 346 a 368Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2015) - Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano y Estudios de la Organización; 346 a 368Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 2 (2015) - Pensamento Crítico Latino-Americano e Estudos Organizacionais; 346 a 3681679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVspahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15904/44914Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrtiz, Nancy Piedad DiazBandeira, Mariana Lima2023-02-23T19:22:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/15904Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:50.521699Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
Responsabilidad social interna: entre la diferencia y el discurso en el escenario organizacional
Responsabilidade social interna: entre a diferença e o discurso no cenário organizacional
title Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
spellingShingle Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
Ortiz, Nancy Piedad Diaz
title_short Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
title_full Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
title_fullStr Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
title_full_unstemmed Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
title_sort Internal social responsibility: between the difference and the discourse in the organizational scenario
author Ortiz, Nancy Piedad Diaz
author_facet Ortiz, Nancy Piedad Diaz
Bandeira, Mariana Lima
author_role author
author2 Bandeira, Mariana Lima
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ortiz, Nancy Piedad Diaz
Bandeira, Mariana Lima
description The aim of this essay is to discuss that the Internal Social Responsibility discourse as a management model intends to homogenize the treatment of the internal actors of the organization, once it is used in an instrumental perspective focused exclusively in legal themes on the work relation, in opposition to a meaningful perspective focused on the humanization of the work environment. Consequently, organizations hide, under this discourse, practices truly dehumanizing in social life, and encourage, even more, intolerance to differences. This discussion takes place in Latin America, where it demands strength from intercultural discourses and the defense of the human rights in political and business agendas, what highlights the contradictions inherent to these discourses. From a bibliographic review oversocial responsibility, discourse, social identity theory and self-concept theory, the individual, social and organizational mechanisms of elaboration and overcome of stereotypes were discussed, as they help the person to establish references for the perceptions and interpretations of reality. It is discussed that the discourse of social internal responsibility could propose a change in the way that the persons are treated in the organization. In this context, difference would not as a way of social exclusion, but it would be a way to promote equity, giving value to characteristics of individual action in the organization and not in the sense of reinforce the difference between “us” and “them”, in function of the role that each one has in the organizational dynamic.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15904
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15904
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/15904/44914
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2015) - Latin American Critical Thought and Organizational Studies; 346 a 368
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2015) - Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano y Estudios de la Organización; 346 a 368
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 2 (2015) - Pensamento Crítico Latino-Americano e Estudos Organizacionais; 346 a 368
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943209989079040