Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Laís Silveira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Serafim, Mauricio C., Pinheiro, Daniel Moraes, Ames, Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791
Resumo: Administrative actions and processes are seen as part of a post-rational era, in which rationality has become a misunderstood word, and rational action is commonly associated with scientism and technocracy. We assume that this stereotype may have a background of truth, but it is actually based on a fundamental misunderstanding that we attempt to clarify. Thus, the objective of this theoretical essay is to revisit the concept of reason, which is at the foundation of social science, based on the argument that ‘reason’ is one and indivisible, defined here as “lucid reason.” After discussing the classical conception of reason and its trans-valuation to the modern period, we provide the basis for elucidating the following question: how can someone formulate a reason of praxis, capable of guiding their praxis along an entire rational procedure? We suggest that the answer lies in the lucid reason, which consists of the unity between prudence (phrónesis), guided by a contextual and instrumental logic, and intentions, based on reason in its substantive sense. From this concept we can understand the tension experienced in organizations, inherent to the life of reason, through a parenthetic attitude. We conclude that reason as a human characteristic is unique, and likewise, the discussion of rationality in the context of organizations must also be guided by the non-literal separation between two or more rationalities, recognizing administrative action as rational, in its singular sense, with the multiple faculties that compose it.
id FGV-9_fd782d9b0445a82031bd0cf1c63f4093
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/69791
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elementsRazón y Administración: Revisando algunos de los elementos fundamentalesRazão e Administração: revisitando alguns elementos fundamentaisReason. Rationality. Administration. Praxis. Phrónesis.Razón. Racionalidad. Administración. Praxis. Phrónesis.Razão. Racionalidade. Administração. Práxis. Phrónesis.Administrative actions and processes are seen as part of a post-rational era, in which rationality has become a misunderstood word, and rational action is commonly associated with scientism and technocracy. We assume that this stereotype may have a background of truth, but it is actually based on a fundamental misunderstanding that we attempt to clarify. Thus, the objective of this theoretical essay is to revisit the concept of reason, which is at the foundation of social science, based on the argument that ‘reason’ is one and indivisible, defined here as “lucid reason.” After discussing the classical conception of reason and its trans-valuation to the modern period, we provide the basis for elucidating the following question: how can someone formulate a reason of praxis, capable of guiding their praxis along an entire rational procedure? We suggest that the answer lies in the lucid reason, which consists of the unity between prudence (phrónesis), guided by a contextual and instrumental logic, and intentions, based on reason in its substantive sense. From this concept we can understand the tension experienced in organizations, inherent to the life of reason, through a parenthetic attitude. We conclude that reason as a human characteristic is unique, and likewise, the discussion of rationality in the context of organizations must also be guided by the non-literal separation between two or more rationalities, recognizing administrative action as rational, in its singular sense, with the multiple faculties that compose it.Las acciones y procesos administrativos parecen estar en una era posracional, en la que la racionalidad se ha convertido en una palabra incomprendida y la acción racional se asocia comúnmente con el cientificismo y la tecnocracia. Suponemos que este estereotipo puede tener un trasfondo de verdad, pero, sobre todo, se basa en un malentendido primario que intentamos aclarar. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este ensayo teórico es reconsiderar el concepto de razón –base de todas las ciencias sociales– desde el argumento de que esta es una e indivisible, llamada aquí “razón lúcida”. Después de discutir la concepción clásica de la razón y su transvaluación del período moderno, brindamos la base para dilucidar la siguiente pregunta: ¿Cómo formular una razón de la praxis, capaz de guiar la propia praxis a lo largo de un procedimiento racional? Sugerimos que la respuesta está en la razón lúcida, que consiste en el vínculo entre la prudencia (phrónesis), guiada por una lógica contextual e instrumental, y las intenciones, basadas en la razón en su sentido sustantivo. Es a partir de este concepto que podemos entender la tensión experimentada en las organizaciones, inherente a la vida de la razón, a través de una actitud parentética. Concluimos que, así como la razón como característica humana es única, la discusión de la racionalidad en el contexto de las organizaciones también debe guiarse por la separación no literal entre dos o más racionalidades, pero reconociendo la acción administrativa como racional, en su sentido singular con las múltiples facultades que la componen.As ações e os processos administrativos parecem estar em um período pós-racional, no qual a racionalidade se tornou uma palavra mal compreendida, sendo a ação racional comumente associada ao cientificismo e à tecnocracia. Acreditamos que esse estereótipo pode ter um fundo de verdade, mas é, sobretudo, baseado em um mal-entendido fundamental que buscamos esclarecer. Assim, o objetivo deste ensaio teórico é revisitar o conceito de razão, base de toda ciência social, a partir da argumentação de que ela é una e indivisível, sendo denominada aqui razão lúcida. Após um resgate da concepção clássica de razão e sua transavaliação do período moderno, essa contextualização forneceu bases para responder a seguinte pergunta: “como formular uma razão da práxis apta a guiar a própria práxis pelos caminhos de um procedimento racional?”. Sugerimos que a resposta se encontra na razão lúcida, constituída pela unidade entre a prudência (phrónesis), pautada por uma lógica contextual e instrumental, e as intenções, baseadas na razão em seu sentido substantivo. É a partir desse conceito que podemos compreender a tensão experimentada nas organizações, inerente à vida da razão, por meio de uma atitude parentética. Concluímos que, assim como a razão enquanto característica humana é única, a discussão da racionalidade no contexto das organizações também deve ser pautada pela não separação literal entre duas ou mais racionalidades, mas reconhecendo a ação administrativa como racional, em seu sentido singular, com as múltiplas faculdades que a compõem.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2018-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2019); 37-48Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2019); 37-48Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 17 n. 1 (2019); 37-481679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791/74421https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791/74423Copyright (c) 2019 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Laís SilveiraSerafim, Mauricio C.Pinheiro, Daniel MoraesAmes, Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa2019-02-13T18:02:50Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/69791Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T10:00:05.312699Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
Razón y Administración: Revisando algunos de los elementos fundamentales
Razão e Administração: revisitando alguns elementos fundamentais
title Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
spellingShingle Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
Santos, Laís Silveira
Reason. Rationality. Administration. Praxis. Phrónesis.
Razón. Racionalidad. Administración. Praxis. Phrónesis.
Razão. Racionalidade. Administração. Práxis. Phrónesis.
title_short Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
title_full Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
title_fullStr Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
title_full_unstemmed Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
title_sort Reason and Administration: Revisiting some fundamental elements
author Santos, Laís Silveira
author_facet Santos, Laís Silveira
Serafim, Mauricio C.
Pinheiro, Daniel Moraes
Ames, Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa
author_role author
author2 Serafim, Mauricio C.
Pinheiro, Daniel Moraes
Ames, Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Laís Silveira
Serafim, Mauricio C.
Pinheiro, Daniel Moraes
Ames, Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reason. Rationality. Administration. Praxis. Phrónesis.
Razón. Racionalidad. Administración. Praxis. Phrónesis.
Razão. Racionalidade. Administração. Práxis. Phrónesis.
topic Reason. Rationality. Administration. Praxis. Phrónesis.
Razón. Racionalidad. Administración. Praxis. Phrónesis.
Razão. Racionalidade. Administração. Práxis. Phrónesis.
description Administrative actions and processes are seen as part of a post-rational era, in which rationality has become a misunderstood word, and rational action is commonly associated with scientism and technocracy. We assume that this stereotype may have a background of truth, but it is actually based on a fundamental misunderstanding that we attempt to clarify. Thus, the objective of this theoretical essay is to revisit the concept of reason, which is at the foundation of social science, based on the argument that ‘reason’ is one and indivisible, defined here as “lucid reason.” After discussing the classical conception of reason and its trans-valuation to the modern period, we provide the basis for elucidating the following question: how can someone formulate a reason of praxis, capable of guiding their praxis along an entire rational procedure? We suggest that the answer lies in the lucid reason, which consists of the unity between prudence (phrónesis), guided by a contextual and instrumental logic, and intentions, based on reason in its substantive sense. From this concept we can understand the tension experienced in organizations, inherent to the life of reason, through a parenthetic attitude. We conclude that reason as a human characteristic is unique, and likewise, the discussion of rationality in the context of organizations must also be guided by the non-literal separation between two or more rationalities, recognizing administrative action as rational, in its singular sense, with the multiple faculties that compose it.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791/74421
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/69791/74423
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2019); 37-48
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2019); 37-48
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 17 n. 1 (2019); 37-48
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943211658412032