The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bevilacqua, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: dos Santos, Julia Maria Tomás
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/554
Resumo: Objective: to criticaly analyze the joint liability of federal, state and municipal governments regarding medication supply, stated by Brazil’s Supreme Court with general repercussion on the RE 855.178/SE, when construing on the commom competence established in the Federal Constitution, in order to draw attention to the need to regulate the reimbursement mechanisms of federation entities so the balance of the federative pact is restored. Methodology: theoretical and documentary research on the federation entities reimbursement mechanisms regarding the right to health, focusing mainly on the case that has led to the judicial decision in question. The documentary revision was the technical procedure adopted in order to proceed to the indirect observation through official documents, using as sources of secondary data the proposition of Súmula Vinculante nº 4 e the bill nº 4.869/2016, available on Brazilian government’s official websites. Results: the reimbursement mechanism stated by Brazil’s Supreme Court privileges the access to justice by making judicial granting of medication a faster mechanism and, because of that, it tends to increase judicialization of the right to health. Conclusions: it is foreseen the failing to comply with the second part of the established method, regarding the reimbursement of federation entities, due to the intricacy and weakness of the current reimbursement system.
id FIOCRUZ-3_31d8f1b5f010df33f73508b60d6da8d9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/554
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-3
network_name_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178El derecho a la salud en el Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil: el resarcimiento interfederativo bajo el RE nº 855.178A saúde no STF: o ressarcimento interfederativo à luz do Recurso Extraordinário nº 855.178Direito à saúde. Responsabilidade legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.Right to health. Liability. Reimbursement mechanisms.Derecho a la salud. Responsabilidad legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.Objective: to criticaly analyze the joint liability of federal, state and municipal governments regarding medication supply, stated by Brazil’s Supreme Court with general repercussion on the RE 855.178/SE, when construing on the commom competence established in the Federal Constitution, in order to draw attention to the need to regulate the reimbursement mechanisms of federation entities so the balance of the federative pact is restored. Methodology: theoretical and documentary research on the federation entities reimbursement mechanisms regarding the right to health, focusing mainly on the case that has led to the judicial decision in question. The documentary revision was the technical procedure adopted in order to proceed to the indirect observation through official documents, using as sources of secondary data the proposition of Súmula Vinculante nº 4 e the bill nº 4.869/2016, available on Brazilian government’s official websites. Results: the reimbursement mechanism stated by Brazil’s Supreme Court privileges the access to justice by making judicial granting of medication a faster mechanism and, because of that, it tends to increase judicialization of the right to health. Conclusions: it is foreseen the failing to comply with the second part of the established method, regarding the reimbursement of federation entities, due to the intricacy and weakness of the current reimbursement system.Objetivo: hacer un análisis crítico de la tesis de responsabilidad solidaria por el fornecimiento de medicamentos, establecida con repercusión general por el STF, en el RE 855.178/SE, cuando interpreta la competencia administrativa común de la Unión, de los estados y de los municipios, prevista por la Constitución Federal en relación a la salud, de manera a llamar la atención para la necesidad de reglamentarse los mecanismos intergubernamentales de resarcimiento, restableciéndose el equilibrio en el pacto federativo. Metodología: investigación teórica y documental acerca del resarcimiento interfederativo en las acciones y prestaciones de salud, teniendo como Norte el caso que ha conducido a la fijación de la tesis. La revisión documental fue el procedimiento técnico adoptado para proceder a la observación indirecta del objeto investigado, por intermedio de documentos oficiales, habiéndose adoptado como fuente secundaria la propuesta de Súmula Vinculante nº 4 y el Proyecto de Ley 4.869/2016, disponibles en los sitios internet oficiales del gobierno brasileño. Resultados: la sistemática fijada por el STF privilegia el acceso a la justicia, tornando más célere la concesión judicial de medicamentos y, por ello, puede fomentar la judicialización de la salud. Conclusiones: se entiende que no se va a sostener la segunda parte de la tesis, referente al resarcimiento interfederativo, debido a la complejidad y a la fragilidad del actual sistema de resarcimiento intergubernamental.Objetivo: fazer uma análise crítica sobre a tese da responsabilidade solidária pelo fornecimento de medicamentos, fixada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal com repercussão geral, no Recurso Extraordinário nº 855.178/SE, ao interpretar a competência administrativa comum da União, Estados e Municípios prevista na Constituição Federal relativamente à saúde, de maneira a chamar atenção para a necessidade de se regulamentar os mecanismos de ressarcimento intergovernamental, com vistas a restabelecer o equilíbrio no pacto federativo. Metodologia: pesquisa teórica e documental sobre o ressarcimento interfederativo de ações e prestações de saúde, tendo como norte o caso que ensejou na fixação da tese. A revisão documental foi o procedimento técnico adotado para fazer a observação indireta do objeto pesquisado, por meio de documentos oficiais, adotando-se como fonte secundária a proposição de Súmula Vinculante nº 4 e o Projeto de Lei nº 4.869/2016, disponíveis em sítios oficiais do governo brasileiro. Resultados: a sistemática fixada pelo SupremoTribunal Federal privilegia o acesso à justiça, de maneira a tornar mais célere a concessão judicial de medicamentos e, em razão disso, tende a fomentar a judicialização da saúde. Conclusões: vislumbra-se o descumprimento da segunda parte da tese, referente ao ressarcimento interferativo, haja vista a complexidade e fragilidade da sistemática atual de reembolso intergovernamental.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília2019-09-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnálise documental; pesquisa teórica; pesquisa conceitualapplication/pdfhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/55410.17566/ciads.v8i3.554Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2019): (JUL./SET. 2019); 186-205Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2019): (JUL./SET. 2019); 186-205Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 8 n. 3 (2019): (JUL./SET. 2019); 186-2052358-18242317-839610.17566/ciads.v8i3reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/554/603Copyright (c) 2019 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBevilacqua, Lucasdos Santos, Julia Maria Tomás2020-03-24T20:04:27Zoai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/554Revistahttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.brPUBhttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/oaicadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br2358-18242317-8396opendoar:2020-03-24T20:04:27Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
El derecho a la salud en el Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil: el resarcimiento interfederativo bajo el RE nº 855.178
A saúde no STF: o ressarcimento interfederativo à luz do Recurso Extraordinário nº 855.178
title The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
spellingShingle The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
Bevilacqua, Lucas
Direito à saúde. Responsabilidade legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.
Right to health. Liability. Reimbursement mechanisms.
Derecho a la salud. Responsabilidad legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.
title_short The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
title_full The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
title_fullStr The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
title_full_unstemmed The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
title_sort The right to health on Brazil’s Supreme Court: federation entities reimbursement in light of RE nº 855.178
author Bevilacqua, Lucas
author_facet Bevilacqua, Lucas
dos Santos, Julia Maria Tomás
author_role author
author2 dos Santos, Julia Maria Tomás
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bevilacqua, Lucas
dos Santos, Julia Maria Tomás
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito à saúde. Responsabilidade legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.
Right to health. Liability. Reimbursement mechanisms.
Derecho a la salud. Responsabilidad legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.
topic Direito à saúde. Responsabilidade legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.
Right to health. Liability. Reimbursement mechanisms.
Derecho a la salud. Responsabilidad legal. Mecanismo de reembolso.
description Objective: to criticaly analyze the joint liability of federal, state and municipal governments regarding medication supply, stated by Brazil’s Supreme Court with general repercussion on the RE 855.178/SE, when construing on the commom competence established in the Federal Constitution, in order to draw attention to the need to regulate the reimbursement mechanisms of federation entities so the balance of the federative pact is restored. Methodology: theoretical and documentary research on the federation entities reimbursement mechanisms regarding the right to health, focusing mainly on the case that has led to the judicial decision in question. The documentary revision was the technical procedure adopted in order to proceed to the indirect observation through official documents, using as sources of secondary data the proposition of Súmula Vinculante nº 4 e the bill nº 4.869/2016, available on Brazilian government’s official websites. Results: the reimbursement mechanism stated by Brazil’s Supreme Court privileges the access to justice by making judicial granting of medication a faster mechanism and, because of that, it tends to increase judicialization of the right to health. Conclusions: it is foreseen the failing to comply with the second part of the established method, regarding the reimbursement of federation entities, due to the intricacy and weakness of the current reimbursement system.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Análise documental; pesquisa teórica; pesquisa conceitual
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/554
10.17566/ciads.v8i3.554
url https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/554
identifier_str_mv 10.17566/ciads.v8i3.554
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/554/603
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2019): (JUL./SET. 2019); 186-205
Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2019): (JUL./SET. 2019); 186-205
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 8 n. 3 (2019): (JUL./SET. 2019); 186-205
2358-1824
2317-8396
10.17566/ciads.v8i3
reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
collection Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798942494903238656

Registros relacionados