Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wayner Vieira de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo, Maria de Fátima P. Militão Albuquerque, Maria Cynthia Braga, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes, Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho, Luciana Caroline Albuquerque Bezerra, George Santiago Dimech, Patrícia Ismael de Carvalho, Romildo Siqueira de Assunção, Roselene Hans Santos, Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira, Laura Cunha Rodrigues, Celina Maria Turchi Martelli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
spa
por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289
Resumo: The increase in the number of reported cases of microcephaly in Pernambuco State, and Northeast Brazil, characterized an epidemic that led the Brazilian Ministry of Health to declare a national public health emergency. The Brazilian Ministry of Health initially defined suspected cases as newborns with gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks and head circumference (HC) ≤ 33cm, but in December 2015 this cutoff was lowered to 32cm. The current study aimed to estimate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of different cutoff points for HC, using ROC curves, with the Fenton and Intergrowth (2014) curves as the gold standard. The study described cases reported in Pernambuco from August 8 to November 28, 2015, according to sex and GA categories. The Fenton and Intergrowth methods provide HC growth curves according to GA and sex, and microcephaly is defined as a newborn with HC below the 3rd percentile in these distributions. Of the 684 reported cases, 599 were term or post-term neonates. For these, the analyses with ROC curves show that according to the Fenton criterion the cutoff point with the largest area under the ROC curve, with sensitivity greater than specificity, is 32cm for both sexes. Using the Intergrowth method and following the same criteria, the cutoff points are 32cm and 31.5cm for males and females, respectively. The cutoff point identified by the Fenton method (32cm) coincided with the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommendation. Adopting Intergrowth as the standard, the choice would be 32cm for males and 31.5cm for females. The study identified the need to conduct critical and on-going analyses to evaluate cutoff points, including other characteristics for microcephaly case definition.
id FIOCRUZ-5_9248c4ccd0552f909566b13f391b6b1c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6289
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected casesMicrocefalia en el estado de Pernambuco, Brasil: características epidemiológicas y evaluación de la precisión diagnóstica de los puntos de corte adoptados para la notificación de casosMicrocefalia no Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil: características epidemiológicas e avaliação da acurácia diagnóstica dos pontos de corte adotados para notificação de casoMicrocephalyZika Virus InfectionEpidemiological SurveillanceData AccuracyMicrocefaliaInfección por el Virus ZikaVigilancia EpidemiológicaExactitud de los DatosMicrocefaliaInfecção por Zika VírusVigilância EpidemiológicaConfiabilidade dos DadosThe increase in the number of reported cases of microcephaly in Pernambuco State, and Northeast Brazil, characterized an epidemic that led the Brazilian Ministry of Health to declare a national public health emergency. The Brazilian Ministry of Health initially defined suspected cases as newborns with gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks and head circumference (HC) ≤ 33cm, but in December 2015 this cutoff was lowered to 32cm. The current study aimed to estimate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of different cutoff points for HC, using ROC curves, with the Fenton and Intergrowth (2014) curves as the gold standard. The study described cases reported in Pernambuco from August 8 to November 28, 2015, according to sex and GA categories. The Fenton and Intergrowth methods provide HC growth curves according to GA and sex, and microcephaly is defined as a newborn with HC below the 3rd percentile in these distributions. Of the 684 reported cases, 599 were term or post-term neonates. For these, the analyses with ROC curves show that according to the Fenton criterion the cutoff point with the largest area under the ROC curve, with sensitivity greater than specificity, is 32cm for both sexes. Using the Intergrowth method and following the same criteria, the cutoff points are 32cm and 31.5cm for males and females, respectively. The cutoff point identified by the Fenton method (32cm) coincided with the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommendation. Adopting Intergrowth as the standard, the choice would be 32cm for males and 31.5cm for females. The study identified the need to conduct critical and on-going analyses to evaluate cutoff points, including other characteristics for microcephaly case definition.El aumento de las notificaciones de casos de microcefalia en Pernambuco, Brasil, y en el Nordeste caracterizó una epidemia que condujo al Ministerio de Salud a decretar una emergencia nacional de salud pública. En un primer momento, el Ministerio de Salud definió como casos sospechosos a recién nacidos de 37 semanas o más de edad gestacional (EG) y con perímetro cefálico (PC) ≤ 33cm, siendo, en diciembre de 2015, reducida esa medida a 32cm. Este estudio tuvo por objetivo estimar la precisión, sensibilidad y especificidad de diferentes puntos de corte para el PC, utilizando curvas ROC y, como patrones oro, las curvas de Fenton y de Intergrowth (2014). Se describieron los casos notificados en Pernambuco entre 2 de agosto de 2015 y 28 de noviembre de 2015, según sexo y categorías de EG. Los métodos de Fenton y de Intergrowth proporcionan curvas de crecimiento para el PC ,de acuerdo con EG y sexo, considerando positivos para microcefalia los recién nacidos con un PC debajo del percentil 3 de estas distribuciones. De los 684 casos notificados, 599 fueron recién nacidos a término/pos-término. Para estos, los análisis con curvas ROC muestran, según Fenton, que el punto de corte que presentó una mayor área bajo la curva ROC, con sensibilidad mayor que especificidad, fue 32cm, para ambos sexos. Por el método de Intergrowth los puntos de corte, respetando los mismos criterios, son 32cm y 31,5cm para los sexos masculino y femenino, respectivamente. El punto de corte identificado, según Fenton (32cm), coincidió con la recomendación del Ministerio de Salud. Adoptándose Intergrowth como patrón, la elección sería 32 cm para el sexo masculino y 31,5cm para el sexo femenino. Como conclusión, se apunta la necesidad de realizar análisis críticos y continuados para evaluar puntos de corte, incluyendo otras características para definición de casoO aumento das notificações de casos de microcefalia em Pernambuco, Brasil, e no Nordeste caracterizou uma epidemia que levou o Ministério da Saúde a decretar emergência nacional de saúde pública. Inicialmente, o Ministério da Saúde definiu como suspeitos recém-nascidos de 37 semanas ou mais de idade gestacional (IG) e com perímetro cefálico (PC) ≤ 33cm, tendo, em dezembro de 2015, reduzido essa medida para 32cm. Este estudo objetivou estimar a acurácia, a sensibilidade e a especificidade de diferentes pontos de corte para o PC, utilizando curvas ROC e, como padrões-ouro, as curvas de Fenton e de Intergrowth 2014. Foram descritos os casos notificados em Pernambuco entre 2 de agosto de 2015 e 28 de novembro de 2015, segundo sexo e categorias de IG. Os métodos de Fenton e Intergrowth fornecem curvas de crescimento para o PC de acordo com IG e sexo, considerando positivos para microcefalia os recém-nascidos com PC abaixo do percentil 3 dessas distribuições. Dos 684 casos notificados, 599 foram recém-nascidos a termo/pós-termo. Para esses, as análises com curvas ROC mostram, segundo Fenton, que o ponto de corte que apresentou maior área sob a curva ROC, com sensibilidade maior que especificidade, foi 32cm, para ambos os sexos. Pelo método Intergrowth, os pontos de corte, respeitando os mesmos critérios, são 32cm e 31,5cm, para os sexos masculino e feminino respectivamente. O ponto de corte identificado, segundo Fenton (32cm), coincidiu com a recomendação do Ministério da Saúde. Adotando-se Intergrowth como padrão, a escolha seria de 32cm, para o sexo masculino, e de 31,5cm, para o sexo feminino. Concluindo, aponta-se a necessidade de realizar análises críticas e continuadas para avaliar pontos de corte, incluindo outras características para a definição de caso.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2016-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289Reports in Public Health; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): AprilCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): Abril1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengspaporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13368https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13369https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13370https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13371https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13372https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13373Wayner Vieira de SouzaThalia Velho Barreto de AraújoMaria de Fátima P. Militão AlbuquerqueMaria Cynthia BragaRicardo Arraes de Alencar XimenesDemócrito de Barros Miranda-FilhoLuciana Caroline Albuquerque BezerraGeorge Santiago DimechPatrícia Ismael de CarvalhoRomildo Siqueira de AssunçãoRoselene Hans SantosWanderson Kleber de OliveiraLaura Cunha RodriguesCelina Maria Turchi Martelliinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:13Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6289Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:07:11.719326Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
Microcefalia en el estado de Pernambuco, Brasil: características epidemiológicas y evaluación de la precisión diagnóstica de los puntos de corte adoptados para la notificación de casos
Microcefalia no Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil: características epidemiológicas e avaliação da acurácia diagnóstica dos pontos de corte adotados para notificação de caso
title Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
spellingShingle Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
Wayner Vieira de Souza
Microcephaly
Zika Virus Infection
Epidemiological Surveillance
Data Accuracy
Microcefalia
Infección por el Virus Zika
Vigilancia Epidemiológica
Exactitud de los Datos
Microcefalia
Infecção por Zika Vírus
Vigilância Epidemiológica
Confiabilidade dos Dados
title_short Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
title_full Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
title_fullStr Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
title_full_unstemmed Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
title_sort Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases
author Wayner Vieira de Souza
author_facet Wayner Vieira de Souza
Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo
Maria de Fátima P. Militão Albuquerque
Maria Cynthia Braga
Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes
Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho
Luciana Caroline Albuquerque Bezerra
George Santiago Dimech
Patrícia Ismael de Carvalho
Romildo Siqueira de Assunção
Roselene Hans Santos
Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira
Laura Cunha Rodrigues
Celina Maria Turchi Martelli
author_role author
author2 Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo
Maria de Fátima P. Militão Albuquerque
Maria Cynthia Braga
Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes
Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho
Luciana Caroline Albuquerque Bezerra
George Santiago Dimech
Patrícia Ismael de Carvalho
Romildo Siqueira de Assunção
Roselene Hans Santos
Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira
Laura Cunha Rodrigues
Celina Maria Turchi Martelli
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wayner Vieira de Souza
Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo
Maria de Fátima P. Militão Albuquerque
Maria Cynthia Braga
Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes
Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho
Luciana Caroline Albuquerque Bezerra
George Santiago Dimech
Patrícia Ismael de Carvalho
Romildo Siqueira de Assunção
Roselene Hans Santos
Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira
Laura Cunha Rodrigues
Celina Maria Turchi Martelli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Microcephaly
Zika Virus Infection
Epidemiological Surveillance
Data Accuracy
Microcefalia
Infección por el Virus Zika
Vigilancia Epidemiológica
Exactitud de los Datos
Microcefalia
Infecção por Zika Vírus
Vigilância Epidemiológica
Confiabilidade dos Dados
topic Microcephaly
Zika Virus Infection
Epidemiological Surveillance
Data Accuracy
Microcefalia
Infección por el Virus Zika
Vigilancia Epidemiológica
Exactitud de los Datos
Microcefalia
Infecção por Zika Vírus
Vigilância Epidemiológica
Confiabilidade dos Dados
description The increase in the number of reported cases of microcephaly in Pernambuco State, and Northeast Brazil, characterized an epidemic that led the Brazilian Ministry of Health to declare a national public health emergency. The Brazilian Ministry of Health initially defined suspected cases as newborns with gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks and head circumference (HC) ≤ 33cm, but in December 2015 this cutoff was lowered to 32cm. The current study aimed to estimate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of different cutoff points for HC, using ROC curves, with the Fenton and Intergrowth (2014) curves as the gold standard. The study described cases reported in Pernambuco from August 8 to November 28, 2015, according to sex and GA categories. The Fenton and Intergrowth methods provide HC growth curves according to GA and sex, and microcephaly is defined as a newborn with HC below the 3rd percentile in these distributions. Of the 684 reported cases, 599 were term or post-term neonates. For these, the analyses with ROC curves show that according to the Fenton criterion the cutoff point with the largest area under the ROC curve, with sensitivity greater than specificity, is 32cm for both sexes. Using the Intergrowth method and following the same criteria, the cutoff points are 32cm and 31.5cm for males and females, respectively. The cutoff point identified by the Fenton method (32cm) coincided with the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommendation. Adopting Intergrowth as the standard, the choice would be 32cm for males and 31.5cm for females. The study identified the need to conduct critical and on-going analyses to evaluate cutoff points, including other characteristics for microcephaly case definition.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
spa
por
language eng
spa
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13368
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13369
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13370
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13371
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13372
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6289/13373
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2016): April
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 32 n. 4 (2016): Abril
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943382631874560