Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dourado de Oliveira Costa, Dayana
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sousa Ribeiro, Valdinar, Rodrigues Costa Ribeiro, Marizélia, Paula Esteves Pereira, Ana, do Carmo Leal, Maria, Augusto Moura da Silva, Antônio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252
Resumo: Controversial results have been reported on the association between mode of delivery and patient satisfaction. This study investigates which mode of delivery leads to greater satisfaction with hospital admission for childbirth. A cohort study was conducted with data from the Birth in Brazil study, which began in 2011. A total of 23,046 postpartum women were included from a random sample of hospitals, selected by conglomerates with a three level stratification. At the first follow-up, 15,582 women were re-interviewed. Mode of delivery, dichotomized into vaginal or cesarean section, and confounders were collected before hospital discharge. The outcome maternal satisfaction, investigated as a 10-item unidimensional construct, was measured by the Hospital Birth Satisfaction Scale up to six months after discharge. We used a directed acyclic graph to define minimal adjustment variables for confounding. The effect of mode of delivery on satisfaction was estimated using a structural equation model with weighting by the inverse of the probability of selection, considering the complex sampling design. The weight was estimated considering the different sample selection probabilities, the losses to follow-up, and the propensity score, which was estimated in a logistic regression model. The analysis revealed no significant difference in satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth between respondents who had vaginal delivery and cesarean section in the adjusted analysis (standardized coefficient = 0.089; p-value = 0.056). Therefore, women who had vaginal delivery and cesarean section were equally satisfied with their hospitalization for childbirth.
id FIOCRUZ-5_f4c73d35b61925672509cd235998b76b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/8252
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in BrazilInfluencia del tipo de parto en la satisfacción con la hospitalización para el parto en la encuesta Nacer en BrasilInfluência do tipo de parto na satisfação com a internação para o parto na pesquisa Nascer no BrasilPartoCesáreaParto NormalSatisfação do PacienteCausalidadePartoCesáreaParto NormaSatisfacción del PacienteCausalidadParturitionCesarean SectionNatural ChildbirthPatient SatisfactionCausalityControversial results have been reported on the association between mode of delivery and patient satisfaction. This study investigates which mode of delivery leads to greater satisfaction with hospital admission for childbirth. A cohort study was conducted with data from the Birth in Brazil study, which began in 2011. A total of 23,046 postpartum women were included from a random sample of hospitals, selected by conglomerates with a three level stratification. At the first follow-up, 15,582 women were re-interviewed. Mode of delivery, dichotomized into vaginal or cesarean section, and confounders were collected before hospital discharge. The outcome maternal satisfaction, investigated as a 10-item unidimensional construct, was measured by the Hospital Birth Satisfaction Scale up to six months after discharge. We used a directed acyclic graph to define minimal adjustment variables for confounding. The effect of mode of delivery on satisfaction was estimated using a structural equation model with weighting by the inverse of the probability of selection, considering the complex sampling design. The weight was estimated considering the different sample selection probabilities, the losses to follow-up, and the propensity score, which was estimated in a logistic regression model. The analysis revealed no significant difference in satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth between respondents who had vaginal delivery and cesarean section in the adjusted analysis (standardized coefficient = 0.089; p-value = 0.056). Therefore, women who had vaginal delivery and cesarean section were equally satisfied with their hospitalization for childbirth.Los estudios muestran resultados controvertidos en cuanto a la asociación entre el tipo de parto y la satisfacción de la paciente. Este estudio investiga qué tipo de parto presenta mayor satisfacción con la hospitalización para el parto. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte con los datos de la encuesta Nacer en Brasil, que había comenzado en 2011. Se incluyeron a 23.046 puérperas de una muestra aleatoria de hospitales, por conglomerados, con estratificación en tres niveles. En el primer seguimiento se volvió a entrevistar a 15.582 mujeres. Los datos sobre el tipo de parto, ya sea por cesárea o vaginal, y los factores de confusión se recogieron antes del alta hospitalaria. El resultado de satisfacción materna, evaluado como un constructo unidimensional de diez ítems, se midió con la Escala de Satisfacción con la Hospitalización por Parto hasta seis meses después del alta. Las variables de ajuste mínimo de confusión se definieron en un gráfico acíclico dirigido. El efecto del tipo de parto sobre la satisfacción se estimó en un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales ponderadas por la inversa de la probabilidad de selección, considerando el diseño de muestreo complejo. La ponderación se estimó con diferentes probabilidades de selección de la muestra, pérdidas de seguimiento y puntuación de propensión. La puntuación de propensión se estimó mediante el modelo de regresión logística. No hubo diferencias en la satisfacción con la hospitalización por parto entre las encuestadas que tuvieron partos vaginales o por cesárea en el análisis ajustado (coeficiente estandarizado = 0,089; p = 0,056). Tanto las mujeres que tuvieron partos vaginales como las que tuvieron por cesárea estaban igualmente satisfechas con su hospitalización por parto.Estudos mostram resultados controversos sobre a associação entre o tipo de parto e a satisfação da paciente. Este estudo investiga qual tipo de parto traz maior satisfação com a internação hospitalar para o parto. Foi realizado um estudo de coorte com dados da pesquisa Nascer no Brasil, iniciada em 2011. Foram incluídas 23.046 puérperas de uma amostra aleatória de hospitais, por conglomerados, com estratificação em três níveis. No primeiro seguimento, 15.582 mulheres foram reentrevistadas. Coletou-se antes da alta hospitalar dados sobre o tipo de parto, dicotomizado em vaginal e cesáreo, e fatores de confusão. O desfecho satisfação materna, avaliado como um construto unidimensional de 10 itens, foi mensurado pela Escala de Satisfação com a Hospitalização para o Parto até seis meses após a alta. As variáveis mínimas de ajuste para confusão foram definidas em um gráfico acíclico direcionado. O efeito do tipo de parto sobre a satisfação foi estimado em um modelo de equação estrutural com ponderação pelo inverso da probabilidade de seleção, considerando o desenho amostral complexo. A ponderação foi estimada considerando as diferentes probabilidades de seleção da amostra, as perdas de seguimento e o escore de propensão. O escore de propensão foi estimado em um modelo de regressão logística. Não houve diferenças na satisfação com a internação para o parto entre as entrevistadas que tiveram partos vaginais e cesáreos na análise ajustada (coeficiente padronizado = 0,089; p = 0,056). As mulheres que tiveram partos vaginais e cesáreos ficaram igualmente satisfeitas com a hospitalização para o parto.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2023-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252Reports in Public Health; Vol. 39 No. 3 (2023): MarchCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 3 (2023): Março1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252/18448https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252/18449Copyright (c) 2023 Cadernos de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDourado de Oliveira Costa, DayanaSousa Ribeiro, ValdinarRodrigues Costa Ribeiro, MarizéliaPaula Esteves Pereira, Anado Carmo Leal, MariaAugusto Moura da Silva, Antônio2023-07-01T17:21:34Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/8252Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:09:25.349973Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
Influencia del tipo de parto en la satisfacción con la hospitalización para el parto en la encuesta Nacer en Brasil
Influência do tipo de parto na satisfação com a internação para o parto na pesquisa Nascer no Brasil
title Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
spellingShingle Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
Dourado de Oliveira Costa, Dayana
Parto
Cesárea
Parto Normal
Satisfação do Paciente
Causalidade
Parto
Cesárea
Parto Norma
Satisfacción del Paciente
Causalidad
Parturition
Cesarean Section
Natural Childbirth
Patient Satisfaction
Causality
title_short Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
title_full Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
title_fullStr Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
title_sort Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil
author Dourado de Oliveira Costa, Dayana
author_facet Dourado de Oliveira Costa, Dayana
Sousa Ribeiro, Valdinar
Rodrigues Costa Ribeiro, Marizélia
Paula Esteves Pereira, Ana
do Carmo Leal, Maria
Augusto Moura da Silva, Antônio
author_role author
author2 Sousa Ribeiro, Valdinar
Rodrigues Costa Ribeiro, Marizélia
Paula Esteves Pereira, Ana
do Carmo Leal, Maria
Augusto Moura da Silva, Antônio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dourado de Oliveira Costa, Dayana
Sousa Ribeiro, Valdinar
Rodrigues Costa Ribeiro, Marizélia
Paula Esteves Pereira, Ana
do Carmo Leal, Maria
Augusto Moura da Silva, Antônio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parto
Cesárea
Parto Normal
Satisfação do Paciente
Causalidade
Parto
Cesárea
Parto Norma
Satisfacción del Paciente
Causalidad
Parturition
Cesarean Section
Natural Childbirth
Patient Satisfaction
Causality
topic Parto
Cesárea
Parto Normal
Satisfação do Paciente
Causalidade
Parto
Cesárea
Parto Norma
Satisfacción del Paciente
Causalidad
Parturition
Cesarean Section
Natural Childbirth
Patient Satisfaction
Causality
description Controversial results have been reported on the association between mode of delivery and patient satisfaction. This study investigates which mode of delivery leads to greater satisfaction with hospital admission for childbirth. A cohort study was conducted with data from the Birth in Brazil study, which began in 2011. A total of 23,046 postpartum women were included from a random sample of hospitals, selected by conglomerates with a three level stratification. At the first follow-up, 15,582 women were re-interviewed. Mode of delivery, dichotomized into vaginal or cesarean section, and confounders were collected before hospital discharge. The outcome maternal satisfaction, investigated as a 10-item unidimensional construct, was measured by the Hospital Birth Satisfaction Scale up to six months after discharge. We used a directed acyclic graph to define minimal adjustment variables for confounding. The effect of mode of delivery on satisfaction was estimated using a structural equation model with weighting by the inverse of the probability of selection, considering the complex sampling design. The weight was estimated considering the different sample selection probabilities, the losses to follow-up, and the propensity score, which was estimated in a logistic regression model. The analysis revealed no significant difference in satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth between respondents who had vaginal delivery and cesarean section in the adjusted analysis (standardized coefficient = 0.089; p-value = 0.056). Therefore, women who had vaginal delivery and cesarean section were equally satisfied with their hospitalization for childbirth.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252/18448
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/8252/18449
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Cadernos de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Cadernos de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/xml
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 39 No. 3 (2023): March
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 3 (2023): Março
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943398780993536