What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | RECIIS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597 |
Resumo: | This article presents the perception of researchers, formulators of science policy and users of research results regarding the operation of the health research system in Brazil. A survey was conducted through a probability sample of researchers and an intentional sample of (formulators of) science policy formulators and users of scientific knowledge as well. Only 17% of responders consider the country’s health research system as a good system, pointing out that the most relevant components are(:) the vision, a set of priorities and the guarantee of financial resources for the research. The components less valuable were : evaluation of the system itself, incorporation of results to the public policies and their dissemination to the public opinion. The main targets of the system must be: improvements in the population health, advancements in knowledge and promotion of equality. These responders would inject a greater proportion of resources in practices like induction for basic, epidemiological and clinical research. They appreciate current health problems, the persistent ones and the forecast of future problems, the service to vulnerable groups and also prevention and cure strategies for diseases as criteria for defining priorities. All opinions suffered some changes due to age groups, the responders’ position (researcher, manager, user) and area of expertise. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-6_11a3e2e4c54bf4ad41be63a0edd1ecfc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/597 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-6 |
network_name_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot studyO que os pesquisadores pensam do sistema de pesquisa em saúde no Brasil: um estudo pilotohealth research systemresearchers perceptionhealth researchscience policycomponents of the health research systemsistema de pesquisa em saúdepercepção dos pesquisadorespesquisa em saúdepolítica científicacomponentes do sistema de pesquisa em saúdeThis article presents the perception of researchers, formulators of science policy and users of research results regarding the operation of the health research system in Brazil. A survey was conducted through a probability sample of researchers and an intentional sample of (formulators of) science policy formulators and users of scientific knowledge as well. Only 17% of responders consider the country’s health research system as a good system, pointing out that the most relevant components are(:) the vision, a set of priorities and the guarantee of financial resources for the research. The components less valuable were : evaluation of the system itself, incorporation of results to the public policies and their dissemination to the public opinion. The main targets of the system must be: improvements in the population health, advancements in knowledge and promotion of equality. These responders would inject a greater proportion of resources in practices like induction for basic, epidemiological and clinical research. They appreciate current health problems, the persistent ones and the forecast of future problems, the service to vulnerable groups and also prevention and cure strategies for diseases as criteria for defining priorities. All opinions suffered some changes due to age groups, the responders’ position (researcher, manager, user) and area of expertise.Este artigo apresenta a percepção de pesquisadores, formuladores de política científica e usuários de resultados de pesquisa sobre o funcionamento do sistema de pesquisa em saúde no Brasil. Foi realizado inquérito utilizando amostra probabilística de pesquisadores e intencional de formuladores da política científica e usuários de conhecimentos científicos. Apenas 17% dos entrevistados consideram bom o funcionamento do sistema de pesquisa em saúde no país apontando como componentes mais relevantes: a visão, agenda de prioridades e garantia dos recursos financeiros para a pesquisa. Os componentes menos valorizados foram: avaliação do próprio sistema, incorporação dos resultados às políticas públicas e difusão dos resultados para a opinião pública. As principais metas do sistema devem ser: melhoria da saúde da população, avanço do conhecimento e promoção da equidade. Os entrevistados aportariam maior proporção de recursos nas modalidades de indução para a pesquisa básica, epidemiológica e clínica. Eles valorizam os problemas de saúde atuais, os persistentes e a previsão de problemas futuros, o atendimento a grupos vulneráveis e a estratégias de prevenção e cura das doenças como critérios de definição de prioridades. Todas as opiniões sofreram alguma modificação segundo os grupos etários, a posição do entrevistado(pesquisador, gestor, usuário) e a área de atuação.Informações sobre o artigoRecebido em: 08/06/2011 Aceito em: 23/03/2012Fonte de financiamento: OMS, DECIT/MS e CNPq no desenvolvimento do estudo piloto. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz)2012-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/59710.3395/reciis.v6i1.597Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2012)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2012)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 6 n. 1 (2012)1981-6278reponame:RECIIS (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597/1238https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597/1884Noronha, José Carvalho deSilva, Telma RuthSzklo, FernandoBarata, Rita Barradasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-05-20T19:00:01Zoai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/597Revistahttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciishttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/oaireciis@icict.fiocruz.br1981-62781981-6278opendoar:2019-05-20T19:00:01RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study O que os pesquisadores pensam do sistema de pesquisa em saúde no Brasil: um estudo piloto |
title |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study |
spellingShingle |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study Noronha, José Carvalho de health research system researchers perception health research science policy components of the health research system sistema de pesquisa em saúde percepção dos pesquisadores pesquisa em saúde política científica componentes do sistema de pesquisa em saúde |
title_short |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study |
title_full |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study |
title_fullStr |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study |
title_sort |
What researchers think about the health research system in Brazil: a pilot study |
author |
Noronha, José Carvalho de |
author_facet |
Noronha, José Carvalho de Silva, Telma Ruth Szklo, Fernando Barata, Rita Barradas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Telma Ruth Szklo, Fernando Barata, Rita Barradas |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Noronha, José Carvalho de Silva, Telma Ruth Szklo, Fernando Barata, Rita Barradas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
health research system researchers perception health research science policy components of the health research system sistema de pesquisa em saúde percepção dos pesquisadores pesquisa em saúde política científica componentes do sistema de pesquisa em saúde |
topic |
health research system researchers perception health research science policy components of the health research system sistema de pesquisa em saúde percepção dos pesquisadores pesquisa em saúde política científica componentes do sistema de pesquisa em saúde |
description |
This article presents the perception of researchers, formulators of science policy and users of research results regarding the operation of the health research system in Brazil. A survey was conducted through a probability sample of researchers and an intentional sample of (formulators of) science policy formulators and users of scientific knowledge as well. Only 17% of responders consider the country’s health research system as a good system, pointing out that the most relevant components are(:) the vision, a set of priorities and the guarantee of financial resources for the research. The components less valuable were : evaluation of the system itself, incorporation of results to the public policies and their dissemination to the public opinion. The main targets of the system must be: improvements in the population health, advancements in knowledge and promotion of equality. These responders would inject a greater proportion of resources in practices like induction for basic, epidemiological and clinical research. They appreciate current health problems, the persistent ones and the forecast of future problems, the service to vulnerable groups and also prevention and cure strategies for diseases as criteria for defining priorities. All opinions suffered some changes due to age groups, the responders’ position (researcher, manager, user) and area of expertise. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597 10.3395/reciis.v6i1.597 |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/reciis.v6i1.597 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597/1238 https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/597/1884 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2012) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2012) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 6 n. 1 (2012) 1981-6278 reponame:RECIIS (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
collection |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reciis@icict.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1754115695325478912 |