Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488 |
Resumo: | Hemodialysis and renal transplant are both modalities of renal replacement therapy that allow patients to maintain a good quality of life. Water is a major component used in this procedure and proper maintenance is very important as the presence of hidden bacteria and other low-molecular-weight organisms could contaminate it. In Brazil, as a determination from ANVISA, water quality should be monitored monthly through routine analyses (RAs) of dialysis units (DUs). In Rio de Janeiro, monitoring of such guidelines is provided by the Program for Monitoring Water Quality (PMWQ) of the Sanitary Control Agency in conjunction with INCQS/FIOCRUZ through annual supervised analyses (SAs). Objective: To compare the results of RAs conducted by DUs with the results obtained by SAs. Methods: We conducted a transversal comparative study between the results of RAs and SAs at 4 selected points in the treatment system and water distribution of 22 DUs. Results: Eighteen of the 22 DUs showed similar results (81.8%) between the samples, whereas 4 (18.2%) presented different results. Of these, 3 had SAs with unsatisfactory results and RAs with satisfactory results, whereas 1 had SAs with satisfactory results and RAs with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: SAs and RAs showed concordant results for more than 80% DUs, indicating that the instruments for assessing the quality of the DU water currently employed by the Department of Health are able to accurately represent the results of RAs. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_1690b291881dd62d79235fe9c0cba15c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/488 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de JaneiroÁgua para hemodiálise: estudo comparativo entre os resultados das análises fiscais e as análises de rotina realizadas em unidades de diálise no estado do Rio de JaneiroHemodialysisMonitoringRenal FunctionRenal TransplantHemodiáliseMonitoramentoFunção renalTransplante renalHemodialysis and renal transplant are both modalities of renal replacement therapy that allow patients to maintain a good quality of life. Water is a major component used in this procedure and proper maintenance is very important as the presence of hidden bacteria and other low-molecular-weight organisms could contaminate it. In Brazil, as a determination from ANVISA, water quality should be monitored monthly through routine analyses (RAs) of dialysis units (DUs). In Rio de Janeiro, monitoring of such guidelines is provided by the Program for Monitoring Water Quality (PMWQ) of the Sanitary Control Agency in conjunction with INCQS/FIOCRUZ through annual supervised analyses (SAs). Objective: To compare the results of RAs conducted by DUs with the results obtained by SAs. Methods: We conducted a transversal comparative study between the results of RAs and SAs at 4 selected points in the treatment system and water distribution of 22 DUs. Results: Eighteen of the 22 DUs showed similar results (81.8%) between the samples, whereas 4 (18.2%) presented different results. Of these, 3 had SAs with unsatisfactory results and RAs with satisfactory results, whereas 1 had SAs with satisfactory results and RAs with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: SAs and RAs showed concordant results for more than 80% DUs, indicating that the instruments for assessing the quality of the DU water currently employed by the Department of Health are able to accurately represent the results of RAs. A hemodiálise, assim como o transplante renal, é uma forma de terapia de substituição da função renal que permite aos pacientes a manutenção das condições clínicas necessárias a uma boa qualidade de vida. A água é o maior insumo consumido neste procedimento sendo de relevante importância o seu controle adequado, pois nela podem estar ocultos bactérias e outros contaminantes de baixo peso molecular. No Brasil, por determinação da ANVISA, a qualidade da água deve ser monitorada mensalmente através das análises de rotina (ARs) das unidades de diálise (UDs). No Rio de Janeiro (RJ), o acompanhamento de tais diretrizes é feito pelo Programa de Monitoramento da Qualidade da Água (PMQA) das Vigilâncias Sanitárias em conjunto com o INCQS/FIOCRUZ, através de análises fiscais (AFs) anuais. Objetivo: Comparar os resultados das ARs, realizadas pelas UDs, com os resultados obtidos pelas AFs. Método: Foi realizado um estudo comparativo, do tipo transversal, entre os resultados das ARs e AFs, em quatro pontos selecionados no sistema de tratamento e distribuição da água de 22 UDs. Resultados: Dezoito das 22 UDs apresentaram resultados similares (81,8%) entre as amostras, enquanto quatro (18,2%) apresentaram resultados diferentes. Destas, três apresentaram AFs insatisfatórias e ARs satisfatórias, enquanto uma apresentou AF satisfatória com AR insatisfatória. Conclusão: As AFs e as ARs apresentaram resultados similares acima dos 80%, indicando que os instrumentos de avaliação da qualidade da água das UDs, empregados atualmente pelos órgãos de Vigilância Sanitária, traduziram a realidade histórica das ARs.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2015-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/48810.3395/2317-269x.00488Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015): August; 104-109Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-109Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-1092317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488/235Copyright (c) 2015 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamirez, Sonia SilvaDelgado, Alvimar G.Romão, Celia Maria de AraujoAlmeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de2023-06-27T15:00:17Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/488Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:00:17Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro Água para hemodiálise: estudo comparativo entre os resultados das análises fiscais e as análises de rotina realizadas em unidades de diálise no estado do Rio de Janeiro |
title |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro |
spellingShingle |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro Ramirez, Sonia Silva Hemodialysis Monitoring Renal Function Renal Transplant Hemodiálise Monitoramento Função renal Transplante renal |
title_short |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro |
title_full |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro |
title_fullStr |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro |
title_full_unstemmed |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro |
title_sort |
Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro |
author |
Ramirez, Sonia Silva |
author_facet |
Ramirez, Sonia Silva Delgado, Alvimar G. Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Delgado, Alvimar G. Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramirez, Sonia Silva Delgado, Alvimar G. Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hemodialysis Monitoring Renal Function Renal Transplant Hemodiálise Monitoramento Função renal Transplante renal |
topic |
Hemodialysis Monitoring Renal Function Renal Transplant Hemodiálise Monitoramento Função renal Transplante renal |
description |
Hemodialysis and renal transplant are both modalities of renal replacement therapy that allow patients to maintain a good quality of life. Water is a major component used in this procedure and proper maintenance is very important as the presence of hidden bacteria and other low-molecular-weight organisms could contaminate it. In Brazil, as a determination from ANVISA, water quality should be monitored monthly through routine analyses (RAs) of dialysis units (DUs). In Rio de Janeiro, monitoring of such guidelines is provided by the Program for Monitoring Water Quality (PMWQ) of the Sanitary Control Agency in conjunction with INCQS/FIOCRUZ through annual supervised analyses (SAs). Objective: To compare the results of RAs conducted by DUs with the results obtained by SAs. Methods: We conducted a transversal comparative study between the results of RAs and SAs at 4 selected points in the treatment system and water distribution of 22 DUs. Results: Eighteen of the 22 DUs showed similar results (81.8%) between the samples, whereas 4 (18.2%) presented different results. Of these, 3 had SAs with unsatisfactory results and RAs with satisfactory results, whereas 1 had SAs with satisfactory results and RAs with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: SAs and RAs showed concordant results for more than 80% DUs, indicating that the instruments for assessing the quality of the DU water currently employed by the Department of Health are able to accurately represent the results of RAs. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488 10.3395/2317-269x.00488 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/2317-269x.00488 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488/235 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015): August; 104-109 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-109 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-109 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044170928128 |