Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramirez, Sonia Silva
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Delgado, Alvimar G., Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo, Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488
Resumo: Hemodialysis and renal transplant are both modalities of renal replacement therapy that allow patients to maintain a good quality of life. Water is a major component used in this procedure and proper maintenance is very important as the presence of hidden bacteria and other low-molecular-weight organisms could contaminate it. In Brazil, as a determination from ANVISA, water quality should be monitored monthly through routine analyses (RAs) of dialysis units (DUs). In Rio de Janeiro, monitoring of such guidelines is provided by the Program for Monitoring Water Quality (PMWQ) of the Sanitary Control Agency in conjunction with INCQS/FIOCRUZ through annual supervised analyses (SAs). Objective: To compare the results of RAs conducted by DUs with the results obtained by SAs. Methods: We conducted a transversal comparative study between the results of RAs and SAs at 4 selected points in the treatment system and water distribution of 22 DUs. Results: Eighteen of the 22 DUs showed similar results (81.8%) between the samples, whereas 4 (18.2%) presented different results. Of these, 3 had SAs with unsatisfactory results and RAs with satisfactory results, whereas 1 had SAs with satisfactory results and RAs with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: SAs and RAs showed concordant results for more than 80% DUs, indicating that the instruments for assessing the quality of the DU water currently employed by the Department of Health are able to accurately represent the results of RAs.
id FIOCRUZ-9_1690b291881dd62d79235fe9c0cba15c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/488
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de JaneiroÁgua para hemodiálise: estudo comparativo entre os resultados das análises fiscais e as análises de rotina realizadas em unidades de diálise no estado do Rio de JaneiroHemodialysisMonitoringRenal FunctionRenal TransplantHemodiáliseMonitoramentoFunção renalTransplante renalHemodialysis and renal transplant are both modalities of renal replacement therapy that allow patients to maintain a good quality of life. Water is a major component used in this procedure and proper maintenance is very important as the presence of hidden bacteria and other low-molecular-weight organisms could contaminate it. In Brazil, as a determination from ANVISA, water quality should be monitored monthly through routine analyses (RAs) of dialysis units (DUs). In Rio de Janeiro, monitoring of such guidelines is provided by the Program for Monitoring Water Quality (PMWQ) of the Sanitary Control Agency in conjunction with INCQS/FIOCRUZ through annual supervised analyses (SAs). Objective: To compare the results of RAs conducted by DUs with the results obtained by SAs. Methods: We conducted a transversal comparative study between the results of RAs and SAs at 4 selected points in the treatment system and water distribution of 22 DUs. Results: Eighteen of the 22 DUs showed similar results (81.8%) between the samples, whereas 4 (18.2%) presented different results. Of these, 3 had SAs with unsatisfactory results and RAs with satisfactory results, whereas 1 had SAs with satisfactory results and RAs with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: SAs and RAs showed concordant results for more than 80% DUs, indicating that the instruments for assessing the quality of the DU water currently employed by the Department of Health are able to accurately represent the results of RAs. A hemodiálise, assim como o transplante renal, é uma forma de terapia de substituição da função renal que permite aos pacientes a manutenção das condições clínicas necessárias a uma boa qualidade de vida. A água é o maior insumo consumido neste procedimento sendo de relevante importância o seu controle adequado, pois nela podem estar ocultos bactérias e outros contaminantes de baixo peso molecular. No Brasil, por determinação da ANVISA, a qualidade da água deve ser monitorada mensalmente através das análises de rotina (ARs) das unidades de diálise (UDs). No Rio de Janeiro (RJ), o acompanhamento de tais diretrizes é feito pelo Programa de Monitoramento da Qualidade da Água (PMQA) das Vigilâncias Sanitárias em conjunto com o INCQS/FIOCRUZ, através de análises fiscais (AFs) anuais. Objetivo: Comparar os resultados das ARs, realizadas pelas UDs, com os resultados obtidos pelas AFs. Método: Foi realizado um estudo comparativo, do tipo transversal, entre os resultados das ARs e AFs, em quatro pontos selecionados no sistema de tratamento e distribuição da água de 22 UDs. Resultados: Dezoito das 22 UDs apresentaram resultados similares (81,8%) entre as amostras, enquanto quatro (18,2%) apresentaram resultados diferentes. Destas, três apresentaram AFs insatisfatórias e ARs satisfatórias, enquanto uma apresentou AF satisfatória com AR insatisfatória. Conclusão: As AFs e as ARs apresentaram resultados similares acima dos 80%, indicando que os instrumentos de avaliação da qualidade da água das UDs, empregados atualmente pelos órgãos de Vigilância Sanitária, traduziram a realidade histórica das ARs.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2015-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/48810.3395/2317-269x.00488Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015): August; 104-109Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-109Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-1092317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488/235Copyright (c) 2015 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamirez, Sonia SilvaDelgado, Alvimar G.Romão, Celia Maria de AraujoAlmeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de2023-06-27T15:00:17Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/488Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:00:17Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
Água para hemodiálise: estudo comparativo entre os resultados das análises fiscais e as análises de rotina realizadas em unidades de diálise no estado do Rio de Janeiro
title Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
spellingShingle Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
Ramirez, Sonia Silva
Hemodialysis
Monitoring
Renal Function
Renal Transplant
Hemodiálise
Monitoramento
Função renal
Transplante renal
title_short Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
title_full Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
title_fullStr Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
title_full_unstemmed Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
title_sort Water for hemodialysis: comparative study between fiscal analysis and routine analysis in dialysis units in the state of Rio de Janeiro
author Ramirez, Sonia Silva
author_facet Ramirez, Sonia Silva
Delgado, Alvimar G.
Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo
Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de
author_role author
author2 Delgado, Alvimar G.
Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo
Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramirez, Sonia Silva
Delgado, Alvimar G.
Romão, Celia Maria de Araujo
Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Castro Cardoso de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hemodialysis
Monitoring
Renal Function
Renal Transplant
Hemodiálise
Monitoramento
Função renal
Transplante renal
topic Hemodialysis
Monitoring
Renal Function
Renal Transplant
Hemodiálise
Monitoramento
Função renal
Transplante renal
description Hemodialysis and renal transplant are both modalities of renal replacement therapy that allow patients to maintain a good quality of life. Water is a major component used in this procedure and proper maintenance is very important as the presence of hidden bacteria and other low-molecular-weight organisms could contaminate it. In Brazil, as a determination from ANVISA, water quality should be monitored monthly through routine analyses (RAs) of dialysis units (DUs). In Rio de Janeiro, monitoring of such guidelines is provided by the Program for Monitoring Water Quality (PMWQ) of the Sanitary Control Agency in conjunction with INCQS/FIOCRUZ through annual supervised analyses (SAs). Objective: To compare the results of RAs conducted by DUs with the results obtained by SAs. Methods: We conducted a transversal comparative study between the results of RAs and SAs at 4 selected points in the treatment system and water distribution of 22 DUs. Results: Eighteen of the 22 DUs showed similar results (81.8%) between the samples, whereas 4 (18.2%) presented different results. Of these, 3 had SAs with unsatisfactory results and RAs with satisfactory results, whereas 1 had SAs with satisfactory results and RAs with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: SAs and RAs showed concordant results for more than 80% DUs, indicating that the instruments for assessing the quality of the DU water currently employed by the Department of Health are able to accurately represent the results of RAs.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488
10.3395/2317-269x.00488
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488
identifier_str_mv 10.3395/2317-269x.00488
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/488/235
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015): August; 104-109
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-109
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 3 n. 3 (2015): Agosto; 104-109
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044170928128