Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rivera Garcia, Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Jojas Ortega, Juan, Casa Branca, Manoel Mario
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52
Resumo: Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands.
id GOE-1_97c44f2018c038c3f9e810463b6f0ee2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/52
network_acronym_str GOE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.ImplantologySelection criteriaImplant systemImplantologySelection criteriaImplant system Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands. Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands.Specialized Dentistry Group2019-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019): August; 15-33Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 Núm. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-33Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 1 n. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-332674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEengporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/78https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/79Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRivera Garcia, CarlosJojas Ortega, Juan Casa Branca, Manoel Mario 2020-05-11T16:54:25Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/52Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2020-05-11T16:54:25Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
title Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
spellingShingle Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
Rivera Garcia, Carlos
Implantology
Selection criteria
Implant system
Implantology
Selection criteria
Implant system
title_short Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
title_full Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
title_fullStr Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
title_full_unstemmed Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
title_sort Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
author Rivera Garcia, Carlos
author_facet Rivera Garcia, Carlos
Jojas Ortega, Juan
Casa Branca, Manoel Mario
author_role author
author2 Jojas Ortega, Juan
Casa Branca, Manoel Mario
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rivera Garcia, Carlos
Jojas Ortega, Juan
Casa Branca, Manoel Mario
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Implantology
Selection criteria
Implant system
Implantology
Selection criteria
Implant system
topic Implantology
Selection criteria
Implant system
Implantology
Selection criteria
Implant system
description Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52
url https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/78
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/79
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019): August; 15-33
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 Núm. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-33
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 1 n. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-33
2674-8169
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron:GOE
instname_str Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron_str GOE
institution GOE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br
_version_ 1796798447763849216