Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52 |
Resumo: | Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands. |
id |
GOE-1_97c44f2018c038c3f9e810463b6f0ee2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/52 |
network_acronym_str |
GOE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists.ImplantologySelection criteriaImplant systemImplantologySelection criteriaImplant system Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands. Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands.Specialized Dentistry Group2019-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019): August; 15-33Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 Núm. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-33Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 1 n. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-332674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEengporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/78https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/79Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRivera Garcia, CarlosJojas Ortega, Juan Casa Branca, Manoel Mario 2020-05-11T16:54:25Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/52Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2020-05-11T16:54:25Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
title |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
spellingShingle |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. Rivera Garcia, Carlos Implantology Selection criteria Implant system Implantology Selection criteria Implant system |
title_short |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
title_full |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
title_fullStr |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
title_sort |
Trademark selection criteria for bad dental implants used by specialists. |
author |
Rivera Garcia, Carlos |
author_facet |
Rivera Garcia, Carlos Jojas Ortega, Juan Casa Branca, Manoel Mario |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jojas Ortega, Juan Casa Branca, Manoel Mario |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rivera Garcia, Carlos Jojas Ortega, Juan Casa Branca, Manoel Mario |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Implantology Selection criteria Implant system Implantology Selection criteria Implant system |
topic |
Implantology Selection criteria Implant system Implantology Selection criteria Implant system |
description |
Objective: Determine the most used selection criteria when choosing a brand of dental implants by specialist dentists. Material and method: If we identified the parameters for choosing an implant brand, we classified them into technical and market, sorting them into a closed-type questionnaire, valuing it by means of a psychometric scale from 1 to 5, plus an open question. It became a masterpiece for the convenience of twenty-one specialist dentists with less experience among three brands of implants. For the descriptive statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel 2011 version for Mac was used, using measures of central tendency such as Arithmetic and Fashion Media. The technical parameters were classified from 1st to 1st, marketing from 2nd to 2nd and suggested from p1 to p7. Results: The variability in prosthetic retention pillars, adequate availability of the products offered by the company and the compatibility of the additions between commercial brands, were the most relevant factors considered by specialists at the time of choosing a certain implant system. Conclusion: The reasons that influence the choice of an implant system are the variety and availability of products along with compatibility between brands. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52 |
url |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/78 https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/52/79 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019): August; 15-33 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 1 Núm. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-33 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 1 n. 3 (2019): Agosto; 15-33 2674-8169 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) instacron:GOE |
instname_str |
Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
instacron_str |
GOE |
institution |
GOE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br |
_version_ |
1796798447763849216 |