Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abkenar,Fatemeh Zakizadeh
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Rasoulzadeh,Ali, Asghari,Ali
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bragantia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100119
Resumo: ABSTRACT ABSTRACT: Description and prediction of water flow through unsaturated soils is necessary to understand their hydraulic properties, including soil water retention curve (SWRC). Many models have been developed for estimation of SWRC and many researchers compared water retention curve derived from these models with the measured values. In this paper, in addition to comparing measured and derived SWRC, a functional evaluation of SWRC for modeling of soil water movement was carried out using van Genuchten, Brooks-Corey, Campbell and Hutson-Cass models in three sites including Loamy sand, Loam and Clay loam soils. Therefore, the functional behavior of SWRC was quantitatively compared by applying mentioned SWRC to numerical code (HydroGeoSphere) to simulate soil profile drainage under steady-state and transient conditions. The agreement between simulated and measured free drainages values was evaluated using statistical criteria including mean absolute error (MAE), modified index of agreement (d’), modified coefficient efficiency (E’), and t-test. The results demonstrated that the van Genuchten model was slightly better than the other models for estimation of SWRC (MAE 0.014 – 0.016,E’ 0.80 – 0.87 and d’ 0.90 – 0.93) while according to t-test, it was found that the measured and estimated SWRC using various models did not differ significantly. Therefore, it is expected that the simulated free drainage using mentioned SWRC models did not differ significantly with observed values. But the results demonstrated that the simulated free drainage using Brooks-Corey model for Loamy sand soil and van Genuchten and Brooks-Corey models for Loam soil differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) with measured values.
id IAC-1_01cd392f98738ca6164d48d873ee7fd9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0006-87052019000100119
network_acronym_str IAC-1
network_name_str Bragantia
repository_id_str
spelling Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient conditionHydroGeoSpheresoil hydraulic propertiessoil water flow simulationsoil characteristic curveABSTRACT ABSTRACT: Description and prediction of water flow through unsaturated soils is necessary to understand their hydraulic properties, including soil water retention curve (SWRC). Many models have been developed for estimation of SWRC and many researchers compared water retention curve derived from these models with the measured values. In this paper, in addition to comparing measured and derived SWRC, a functional evaluation of SWRC for modeling of soil water movement was carried out using van Genuchten, Brooks-Corey, Campbell and Hutson-Cass models in three sites including Loamy sand, Loam and Clay loam soils. Therefore, the functional behavior of SWRC was quantitatively compared by applying mentioned SWRC to numerical code (HydroGeoSphere) to simulate soil profile drainage under steady-state and transient conditions. The agreement between simulated and measured free drainages values was evaluated using statistical criteria including mean absolute error (MAE), modified index of agreement (d’), modified coefficient efficiency (E’), and t-test. The results demonstrated that the van Genuchten model was slightly better than the other models for estimation of SWRC (MAE 0.014 – 0.016,E’ 0.80 – 0.87 and d’ 0.90 – 0.93) while according to t-test, it was found that the measured and estimated SWRC using various models did not differ significantly. Therefore, it is expected that the simulated free drainage using mentioned SWRC models did not differ significantly with observed values. But the results demonstrated that the simulated free drainage using Brooks-Corey model for Loamy sand soil and van Genuchten and Brooks-Corey models for Loam soil differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) with measured values.Instituto Agronômico de Campinas2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100119Bragantia v.78 n.1 2019reponame:Bragantiainstname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)instacron:IAC10.1590/1678-4499.2017406info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbkenar,Fatemeh ZakizadehRasoulzadeh,AliAsghari,Alieng2019-02-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0006-87052019000100119Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/brag/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br1678-44990006-8705opendoar:2019-02-26T00:00Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
title Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
spellingShingle Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
Abkenar,Fatemeh Zakizadeh
HydroGeoSphere
soil hydraulic properties
soil water flow simulation
soil characteristic curve
title_short Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
title_full Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
title_sort Performance evaluation of different soil water retention functions for modeling of water flow under transient condition
author Abkenar,Fatemeh Zakizadeh
author_facet Abkenar,Fatemeh Zakizadeh
Rasoulzadeh,Ali
Asghari,Ali
author_role author
author2 Rasoulzadeh,Ali
Asghari,Ali
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abkenar,Fatemeh Zakizadeh
Rasoulzadeh,Ali
Asghari,Ali
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HydroGeoSphere
soil hydraulic properties
soil water flow simulation
soil characteristic curve
topic HydroGeoSphere
soil hydraulic properties
soil water flow simulation
soil characteristic curve
description ABSTRACT ABSTRACT: Description and prediction of water flow through unsaturated soils is necessary to understand their hydraulic properties, including soil water retention curve (SWRC). Many models have been developed for estimation of SWRC and many researchers compared water retention curve derived from these models with the measured values. In this paper, in addition to comparing measured and derived SWRC, a functional evaluation of SWRC for modeling of soil water movement was carried out using van Genuchten, Brooks-Corey, Campbell and Hutson-Cass models in three sites including Loamy sand, Loam and Clay loam soils. Therefore, the functional behavior of SWRC was quantitatively compared by applying mentioned SWRC to numerical code (HydroGeoSphere) to simulate soil profile drainage under steady-state and transient conditions. The agreement between simulated and measured free drainages values was evaluated using statistical criteria including mean absolute error (MAE), modified index of agreement (d’), modified coefficient efficiency (E’), and t-test. The results demonstrated that the van Genuchten model was slightly better than the other models for estimation of SWRC (MAE 0.014 – 0.016,E’ 0.80 – 0.87 and d’ 0.90 – 0.93) while according to t-test, it was found that the measured and estimated SWRC using various models did not differ significantly. Therefore, it is expected that the simulated free drainage using mentioned SWRC models did not differ significantly with observed values. But the results demonstrated that the simulated free drainage using Brooks-Corey model for Loamy sand soil and van Genuchten and Brooks-Corey models for Loam soil differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) with measured values.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100119
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4499.2017406
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bragantia v.78 n.1 2019
reponame:Bragantia
instname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron:IAC
instname_str Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron_str IAC
institution IAC
reponame_str Bragantia
collection Bragantia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1754193306804289536