Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wei Liang Wang, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Luisa, de Barros, Matheus, Abrahão Homsi, Júlia, Morais Zambom, Mariana, Fajreldines dos Santos, Ezequiel, de Albuquerque Coelho Filho, Paulo Sergio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/884
Resumo: This article is based on a representative and randomly selected sample of 396 individual criminal decisions from the Federal Supreme Court, issued between January 1, 2020, and June 22, 2021, related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We tracked the petitions, the type of imprisonment, the date of judgment, the type of legal action, and the outcomes of these requests. Subsequently, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the arguments employed by the Court in reaching its decisions. The main objective of the study is to understand how the Court ruled on requests for release from incarceration and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the judicial reasoning. The findings indicate that the pandemic had no relevant impact on the Court’s decision-making process. Dismissals on procedural grounds prevailed, allowing the court to avoid ruling on the merits of a claim. On the other hand, when the merits were analyzed, the pandemic was not treated as a sufficient argument for releasing a prisoner. Additionally, during the pandemic, CNJ’s Recommendation No. 62 and ADPF No. 347 had no argumentative prominence in the few decisions that granted requests for release. This research reinforces the diagnosis that the pandemic has not changed how the Judiciary deals with imprisonment. This finding contributes to understand the challenges in tackling mass incarceration in Brazil.
id IBRASPP-1_25efe2a7d6a6c46f886a64601a5f6f5f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/884
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemicDecidindo não decidir: a atuação penal do STF durante a pandemia de Covid-19STFCovid-19pandemiaprisãosuperencarceramentopesquisa empíricaBrazilian Supreme CourtCovid-19pandemicprisonmass incarcerationempirical researchThis article is based on a representative and randomly selected sample of 396 individual criminal decisions from the Federal Supreme Court, issued between January 1, 2020, and June 22, 2021, related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We tracked the petitions, the type of imprisonment, the date of judgment, the type of legal action, and the outcomes of these requests. Subsequently, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the arguments employed by the Court in reaching its decisions. The main objective of the study is to understand how the Court ruled on requests for release from incarceration and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the judicial reasoning. The findings indicate that the pandemic had no relevant impact on the Court’s decision-making process. Dismissals on procedural grounds prevailed, allowing the court to avoid ruling on the merits of a claim. On the other hand, when the merits were analyzed, the pandemic was not treated as a sufficient argument for releasing a prisoner. Additionally, during the pandemic, CNJ’s Recommendation No. 62 and ADPF No. 347 had no argumentative prominence in the few decisions that granted requests for release. This research reinforces the diagnosis that the pandemic has not changed how the Judiciary deals with imprisonment. This finding contributes to understand the challenges in tackling mass incarceration in Brazil.Este artigo é baseado em uma amostra representativa e aleatória de 396 decisões monocráticas penais do Supremo Tribunal Federal, proferidas entre 01/01/2020 e 22/06/2021, que mencionam a pandemia de Covid-19. Foram mapeados os pedidos, o tipo de prisão, a data de julgamento, o tipo de ação e o resultado dos pedidos. Em seguida, foi feita uma análise qualitativa dos argumentos utilizados pela Corte para decidir. O objetivo principal do estudo é compreender como a Corte julgou pedidos de desencarceramento e o peso da pandemia de Covid-19 na argumentação judicial. Os dados indicam que a pandemia não teve impacto relevante na forma de decidir do STF em casos de prisão. Prevaleceram os indeferimentos de pedidos de soltura, com significativa mobilização argumentativa de óbices processuais, permitindo que a Corte não se posicionasse sobre questões de mérito. Por outro lado, quando o mérito foi analisado, a pandemia não foi tratada como argumento suficiente para desencarcerar. Ademais, a pandemia, a Recomendação 62 do CNJ e a ADPF 347 não tiveram grande destaque argumentativo nas poucas decisões que concederam pedidos de desencarceramento. A pesquisa reforça o diagnóstico de que a pandemia não mudou o modo como o Judiciário lida com a prisão. Esse achado de pesquisa contribui para a compreensão dos obstáculos para o enfrentamento do superencarceramento no Brasil.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/88410.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.884Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/884/514Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Wei Liang Wang, Luisa Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Matheus de Barros, Júlia Abrahão Homsi, Mariana Morais Zambom, Ezequiel Fajreldines dos Santos, Paulo Sergio de Albuquerque Coelho Filhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWei Liang Wang, DanielMoraes Abreu Ferreira, Luisa de Barros, MatheusAbrahão Homsi, JúliaMorais Zambom, MarianaFajreldines dos Santos, Ezequiel de Albuquerque Coelho Filho, Paulo Sergio2024-03-27T10:37:17Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/884Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2024-03-27T10:37:17Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
Decidindo não decidir: a atuação penal do STF durante a pandemia de Covid-19
title Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
spellingShingle Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
Wei Liang Wang, Daniel
STF
Covid-19
pandemia
prisão
superencarceramento
pesquisa empírica
Brazilian Supreme Court
Covid-19
pandemic
prison
mass incarceration
empirical research
title_short Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
title_sort Deciding not to decide: the criminal rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic
author Wei Liang Wang, Daniel
author_facet Wei Liang Wang, Daniel
Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Luisa
de Barros, Matheus
Abrahão Homsi, Júlia
Morais Zambom, Mariana
Fajreldines dos Santos, Ezequiel
de Albuquerque Coelho Filho, Paulo Sergio
author_role author
author2 Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Luisa
de Barros, Matheus
Abrahão Homsi, Júlia
Morais Zambom, Mariana
Fajreldines dos Santos, Ezequiel
de Albuquerque Coelho Filho, Paulo Sergio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wei Liang Wang, Daniel
Moraes Abreu Ferreira, Luisa
de Barros, Matheus
Abrahão Homsi, Júlia
Morais Zambom, Mariana
Fajreldines dos Santos, Ezequiel
de Albuquerque Coelho Filho, Paulo Sergio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv STF
Covid-19
pandemia
prisão
superencarceramento
pesquisa empírica
Brazilian Supreme Court
Covid-19
pandemic
prison
mass incarceration
empirical research
topic STF
Covid-19
pandemia
prisão
superencarceramento
pesquisa empírica
Brazilian Supreme Court
Covid-19
pandemic
prison
mass incarceration
empirical research
description This article is based on a representative and randomly selected sample of 396 individual criminal decisions from the Federal Supreme Court, issued between January 1, 2020, and June 22, 2021, related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We tracked the petitions, the type of imprisonment, the date of judgment, the type of legal action, and the outcomes of these requests. Subsequently, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the arguments employed by the Court in reaching its decisions. The main objective of the study is to understand how the Court ruled on requests for release from incarceration and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the judicial reasoning. The findings indicate that the pandemic had no relevant impact on the Court’s decision-making process. Dismissals on procedural grounds prevailed, allowing the court to avoid ruling on the merits of a claim. On the other hand, when the merits were analyzed, the pandemic was not treated as a sufficient argument for releasing a prisoner. Additionally, during the pandemic, CNJ’s Recommendation No. 62 and ADPF No. 347 had no argumentative prominence in the few decisions that granted requests for release. This research reinforces the diagnosis that the pandemic has not changed how the Judiciary deals with imprisonment. This finding contributes to understand the challenges in tackling mass incarceration in Brazil.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/884
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.884
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/884
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.884
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/884/514
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 1 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 1 (2024)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941788164096