Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors"
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/900 |
Resumo: | The tragic consequences of a wrongful conviction require the adoption of mechanisms to prevent its recurrence, and it is not acceptable to disregard the knowledge developed by the safety science, which has long searched for the best path that a given organization should follow to reduce the risk of tragic results in its operation. This article – which seeks to answer the question of which model of protection against error should be adopted by the Judiciary itself – deals precisely with the theoretical knowledge related to the prevention of tragic incidents, with special emphasis on the defense of a friendly approach to errors, which is inevitable to understand their causal complex and to contain their recurrence. From there, a model of organizational learning based on the analysis of cases of judicial errors, indispensable for the evolution of the Justice System, is drawn, which is done from the combination of the claims of safety science, the principles of responsible judicial innovation and the rules that discipline criminal decision-making, especially the facts adjudication. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_e447bed0f4ebd5b110e6cb885da72096 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/900 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" Pensando a qualidade do juízo fático-probatório: um modelo de evolução baseado no aprendizado com errosErro Judiciário; Valoração da Prova; Aprendizado organizacional. Aprendizagem baseada em erros; Inovação JudicialWrongful Convictions; Evaluation of Evidence; Organizational Learning; Error-based learning; Judicial InnovationThe tragic consequences of a wrongful conviction require the adoption of mechanisms to prevent its recurrence, and it is not acceptable to disregard the knowledge developed by the safety science, which has long searched for the best path that a given organization should follow to reduce the risk of tragic results in its operation. This article – which seeks to answer the question of which model of protection against error should be adopted by the Judiciary itself – deals precisely with the theoretical knowledge related to the prevention of tragic incidents, with special emphasis on the defense of a friendly approach to errors, which is inevitable to understand their causal complex and to contain their recurrence. From there, a model of organizational learning based on the analysis of cases of judicial errors, indispensable for the evolution of the Justice System, is drawn, which is done from the combination of the claims of safety science, the principles of responsible judicial innovation and the rules that discipline criminal decision-making, especially the facts adjudication.As consequências trágicas de uma condenação criminal errônea impõem a adoção de mecanismos de prevenção de sua recorrência, não sendo admissível que se despreze o conhecimento desenvolvido no âmbito da chamada ciência da prevenção ou ciência da segurança (Safety Science), que há muito busca o melhor caminho que uma dada organização deve seguir para reduzir o risco de resultados trágicos em sua operação. No presente artigo, que se volta a perquirir sobre qual seria o modelo de tutela contra o erro que deveria ser adotado pelos gestores e gestoras do próprio Poder Judiciário, aborda-se justamente o conhecimento teórico relacionado à prevenção de incidentes trágicos, dando-se especial destaque à defesa de uma abordagem “amigável” dos erros, inevitável à compreensão de seu complexo causal e à contenção de sua recorrência. A partir daí, defende-se um modelo de aprendizado organizacional com base na análise de casos de erros judiciários, indispensável à evolução do Sistema de Justiça, conjugando os reclames da ciência da segurança, os princípios da inovação judicial responsável e as normas que disciplinam a tomada de decisão penal, sobretudo acerca da quaestio facti.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/90010.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.900Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/900/507Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Bragahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga Damasceno, Fernando2023-10-26T12:04:59Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/900Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-10-26T12:04:59Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" Pensando a qualidade do juízo fático-probatório: um modelo de evolução baseado no aprendizado com erros |
title |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" |
spellingShingle |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" Braga Damasceno, Fernando Erro Judiciário; Valoração da Prova; Aprendizado organizacional. Aprendizagem baseada em erros; Inovação Judicial Wrongful Convictions; Evaluation of Evidence; Organizational Learning; Error-based learning; Judicial Innovation |
title_short |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" |
title_full |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" |
title_fullStr |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" |
title_full_unstemmed |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" |
title_sort |
Thinking about the quality of adjudication of facts: a model of improvement based on "learning from errors" |
author |
Braga Damasceno, Fernando |
author_facet |
Braga Damasceno, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Braga Damasceno, Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Erro Judiciário; Valoração da Prova; Aprendizado organizacional. Aprendizagem baseada em erros; Inovação Judicial Wrongful Convictions; Evaluation of Evidence; Organizational Learning; Error-based learning; Judicial Innovation |
topic |
Erro Judiciário; Valoração da Prova; Aprendizado organizacional. Aprendizagem baseada em erros; Inovação Judicial Wrongful Convictions; Evaluation of Evidence; Organizational Learning; Error-based learning; Judicial Innovation |
description |
The tragic consequences of a wrongful conviction require the adoption of mechanisms to prevent its recurrence, and it is not acceptable to disregard the knowledge developed by the safety science, which has long searched for the best path that a given organization should follow to reduce the risk of tragic results in its operation. This article – which seeks to answer the question of which model of protection against error should be adopted by the Judiciary itself – deals precisely with the theoretical knowledge related to the prevention of tragic incidents, with special emphasis on the defense of a friendly approach to errors, which is inevitable to understand their causal complex and to contain their recurrence. From there, a model of organizational learning based on the analysis of cases of judicial errors, indispensable for the evolution of the Justice System, is drawn, which is done from the combination of the claims of safety science, the principles of responsible judicial innovation and the rules that discipline criminal decision-making, especially the facts adjudication. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/900 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.900 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/900 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.900 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/900/507 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Braga https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Fernando Braga https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023) 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941800747008 |