Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Longui,Eduardo Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Romeiro,Diego, Alves,Edenise Segala
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Hoehnea
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2236-89062012000400010
Resumo: We investigated the root and stem wood of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. to test the hypothesis that there are anatomical and water conductivity differences between both organs. Three trees about 20 years old were sampled in the Reserva Biológica de Mogi Guaçu, São Paulo State, Brazil. We observed quantitative anatomical differences between the root, heartwood, and sapwood of C. echinata that result in differences in water conductivity. The sapwood has higher potential hydraulic conductivity than the heartwood (when functional), and root. The higher proportion of axial parenchyma in the root could contribute to the storage of starch and water in unfavorable periods, which is important to the osmotic regulation of the daily water deficits, avoiding cavitation. The stem of C. echinata probably has a higher mechanical strength than the root due to its fibers with thicker wall.
id IBT-1_92b7be73dc4a97b93fbf41dda1a68d33
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2236-89062012000400010
network_acronym_str IBT-1
network_name_str Hoehnea
repository_id_str
spelling Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)heartwoodpau-brasilsapwoodwater transportwood anatomyWe investigated the root and stem wood of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. to test the hypothesis that there are anatomical and water conductivity differences between both organs. Three trees about 20 years old were sampled in the Reserva Biológica de Mogi Guaçu, São Paulo State, Brazil. We observed quantitative anatomical differences between the root, heartwood, and sapwood of C. echinata that result in differences in water conductivity. The sapwood has higher potential hydraulic conductivity than the heartwood (when functional), and root. The higher proportion of axial parenchyma in the root could contribute to the storage of starch and water in unfavorable periods, which is important to the osmotic regulation of the daily water deficits, avoiding cavitation. The stem of C. echinata probably has a higher mechanical strength than the root due to its fibers with thicker wall.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2236-89062012000400010Hoehnea v.39 n.4 2012reponame:Hoehneainstname:Instituto de Botânica (IBT)instacron:IBT10.1590/S2236-89062012000400010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLongui,Eduardo LuizRomeiro,DiegoAlves,Edenise Segalaeng2013-02-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2236-89062012000400010Revistahttp://www.ibot.sp.gov.br/publicacoes/hoehnea/sobre_hoehnea.phpPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||hoehneaibt@gmail.com2236-89060073-2877opendoar:2013-02-19T00:00Hoehnea - Instituto de Botânica (IBT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
title Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
spellingShingle Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
Longui,Eduardo Luiz
heartwood
pau-brasil
sapwood
water transport
wood anatomy
title_short Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
title_full Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
title_fullStr Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
title_sort Differences in anatomy and potential hydraulic conductivity between root and stem of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
author Longui,Eduardo Luiz
author_facet Longui,Eduardo Luiz
Romeiro,Diego
Alves,Edenise Segala
author_role author
author2 Romeiro,Diego
Alves,Edenise Segala
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Longui,Eduardo Luiz
Romeiro,Diego
Alves,Edenise Segala
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv heartwood
pau-brasil
sapwood
water transport
wood anatomy
topic heartwood
pau-brasil
sapwood
water transport
wood anatomy
description We investigated the root and stem wood of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. to test the hypothesis that there are anatomical and water conductivity differences between both organs. Three trees about 20 years old were sampled in the Reserva Biológica de Mogi Guaçu, São Paulo State, Brazil. We observed quantitative anatomical differences between the root, heartwood, and sapwood of C. echinata that result in differences in water conductivity. The sapwood has higher potential hydraulic conductivity than the heartwood (when functional), and root. The higher proportion of axial parenchyma in the root could contribute to the storage of starch and water in unfavorable periods, which is important to the osmotic regulation of the daily water deficits, avoiding cavitation. The stem of C. echinata probably has a higher mechanical strength than the root due to its fibers with thicker wall.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2236-89062012000400010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2236-89062012000400010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2236-89062012000400010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Hoehnea v.39 n.4 2012
reponame:Hoehnea
instname:Instituto de Botânica (IBT)
instacron:IBT
instname_str Instituto de Botânica (IBT)
instacron_str IBT
institution IBT
reponame_str Hoehnea
collection Hoehnea
repository.name.fl_str_mv Hoehnea - Instituto de Botânica (IBT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||hoehneaibt@gmail.com
_version_ 1754193646787231744