OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Urel Rodrigues , Márcio
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Vieira Gonçalves , William, Jesus Brito , Acelmo de, Messias da Silva , Alan Kardec
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Prática Docente
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/article/view/600
Resumo: In this article we aim to investigate the interrelationships between the questions of the Brazilian Mathematical Olympiad of the Public Schools (OBMEP) in the period from 2005 to 2017 with the Learning Environments proposed by Skovsmose (2000). We conduct a qualitative research in the documentary modality. The corpus of the research was constituted by the 260 questions of the OBMEP for Level II (8th and 9th grades) in the period from 2005 to 2017. The data were analyzed through the procedures of Content Analysis from the perspective of Bardin (1977). In our analysis, we seek to map, classify and analyze each of the 260 issues of OBMEP in the light of the theoretical contributions of the learning environments and the critical mathematical education. The results of the research indicated that there is a predominance of OBMEP issues in relation to Environments 1 and 3 – Paradigm of Exercise with reference to Pure Mathematics and semi reality Paradigm of Exercise with reference to Pure Mathematics and semi reality. We conclude that mathematics teachers in service should not develop their pedagogical practices in the classroom simply in Environments 1 and 3 related to the exercise paradigm, as found in the analysis of the issues of OBMEP in the period from 2005 to 2017, but rather move between different Learning Environments.
id IFMT_c417e4c9b0a4af422167111d5d75e9c4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br:article/600
network_acronym_str IFMT
network_name_str Revista Prática Docente
repository_id_str
spelling OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017OBMEP NA PERSPECTIVA DOS AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAGEM: UMA ANÁLISE DE CONTEÚDO NO PERÍODO DE 2005 A 2017OBMEPAmbientes de AprendizagemParadigma do ExercícioCenários para InvestigaçãoOBMEPLearning EnvironmentsParadigm of ExerciseScenery to InvestigationIn this article we aim to investigate the interrelationships between the questions of the Brazilian Mathematical Olympiad of the Public Schools (OBMEP) in the period from 2005 to 2017 with the Learning Environments proposed by Skovsmose (2000). We conduct a qualitative research in the documentary modality. The corpus of the research was constituted by the 260 questions of the OBMEP for Level II (8th and 9th grades) in the period from 2005 to 2017. The data were analyzed through the procedures of Content Analysis from the perspective of Bardin (1977). In our analysis, we seek to map, classify and analyze each of the 260 issues of OBMEP in the light of the theoretical contributions of the learning environments and the critical mathematical education. The results of the research indicated that there is a predominance of OBMEP issues in relation to Environments 1 and 3 – Paradigm of Exercise with reference to Pure Mathematics and semi reality Paradigm of Exercise with reference to Pure Mathematics and semi reality. We conclude that mathematics teachers in service should not develop their pedagogical practices in the classroom simply in Environments 1 and 3 related to the exercise paradigm, as found in the analysis of the issues of OBMEP in the period from 2005 to 2017, but rather move between different Learning Environments.Neste artigo objetivamos investigar as inter-relações entre as questões da Olimpíada Brasileira de Matemática das Escolas Públicas (OBMEP) no período de 2005 a 2017 com os Ambientes de Aprendizagem propostos por Skovsmose (2000). Realizamos uma pesquisa qualitativa na modalidade documental. O corpus da pesquisa foi constituído pelas 260 questões da OBMEP do nível II (8º e 9º anos) do Ensino Fundamental no período de 2005 a 2017. Os dados foram analisados por meio dos procedimentos da Análise de Conteúdo na perspectiva de Bardin (1977). Em nossa análise, procuramos mapear, classificar e analisar cada uma das 260 questões da OBMEP à luz dos aportes teóricos dos Ambientes de Aprendizagem e da Educação Matemática Crítica. Os resultados da pesquisa indicaram que existe uma predominância das questões da OBMEP em relação aos Ambientes 1 e 3 – Paradigma do Exercício com referência à matemática pura e à semi realidade. Concluímos que a OBMEP não deveria servir como parâmetro ou aporte para orientar a prática pedagógica dos professores de Matemática em serviço nas escolas da Educação Básica, porque não possibilita o movimentar-se entre os diferentes Ambientes de Aprendizagem. Concluímos que os professores de Matemática em serviço não devem desenvolver suas práticas pedagógicas em sala de aula simplesmente nos Ambiente1 e 3, relacionados ao Paradigma do Exercício, como constatado na análise das questões da OBMEP no período de 2005 a 2017, mas sim movimentar-se entre os diferentes Ambientes de Aprendizagem.Revista Prática Docente2018-06-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionMathematicsMatemáticasMatemáticaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/article/view/60010.23926/RPD.2526-2149.2018.v3.n1.p54-74.id193Revista Prática Docente (Journal Practice Teacher); Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): Janeiro a Junho de 2018; 54-74Revista Prática Docente (Revista Práctica Docente); Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2018): Janeiro a Junho de 2018; 54-74Revista Prática Docente; v. 3 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro a Junho de 2018; 54-742526-2149reponame:Revista Prática Docenteinstname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (IFMT)instacron:IFMTporhttps://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/article/view/600/588Copyright (c) 2023 A Revista Prática Docente tem o direito de primeira publicaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUrel Rodrigues , MárcioVieira Gonçalves , William Jesus Brito , Acelmo deMessias da Silva , Alan Kardec2023-06-09T00:58:33Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br:article/600Revistahttp://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpdPUBhttps://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/oairevistapraticadocente@cfs.ifmt.edu.br||2526-21492526-2149opendoar:2023-06-09T00:58:33Revista Prática Docente - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (IFMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
OBMEP NA PERSPECTIVA DOS AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAGEM: UMA ANÁLISE DE CONTEÚDO NO PERÍODO DE 2005 A 2017
title OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
spellingShingle OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
Urel Rodrigues , Márcio
OBMEP
Ambientes de Aprendizagem
Paradigma do Exercício
Cenários para Investigação
OBMEP
Learning Environments
Paradigm of Exercise
Scenery to Investigation
title_short OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
title_full OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
title_fullStr OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
title_full_unstemmed OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
title_sort OBMEP IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE PERIOD FROM 2005 TO 2017
author Urel Rodrigues , Márcio
author_facet Urel Rodrigues , Márcio
Vieira Gonçalves , William
Jesus Brito , Acelmo de
Messias da Silva , Alan Kardec
author_role author
author2 Vieira Gonçalves , William
Jesus Brito , Acelmo de
Messias da Silva , Alan Kardec
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Urel Rodrigues , Márcio
Vieira Gonçalves , William
Jesus Brito , Acelmo de
Messias da Silva , Alan Kardec
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv OBMEP
Ambientes de Aprendizagem
Paradigma do Exercício
Cenários para Investigação
OBMEP
Learning Environments
Paradigm of Exercise
Scenery to Investigation
topic OBMEP
Ambientes de Aprendizagem
Paradigma do Exercício
Cenários para Investigação
OBMEP
Learning Environments
Paradigm of Exercise
Scenery to Investigation
description In this article we aim to investigate the interrelationships between the questions of the Brazilian Mathematical Olympiad of the Public Schools (OBMEP) in the period from 2005 to 2017 with the Learning Environments proposed by Skovsmose (2000). We conduct a qualitative research in the documentary modality. The corpus of the research was constituted by the 260 questions of the OBMEP for Level II (8th and 9th grades) in the period from 2005 to 2017. The data were analyzed through the procedures of Content Analysis from the perspective of Bardin (1977). In our analysis, we seek to map, classify and analyze each of the 260 issues of OBMEP in the light of the theoretical contributions of the learning environments and the critical mathematical education. The results of the research indicated that there is a predominance of OBMEP issues in relation to Environments 1 and 3 – Paradigm of Exercise with reference to Pure Mathematics and semi reality Paradigm of Exercise with reference to Pure Mathematics and semi reality. We conclude that mathematics teachers in service should not develop their pedagogical practices in the classroom simply in Environments 1 and 3 related to the exercise paradigm, as found in the analysis of the issues of OBMEP in the period from 2005 to 2017, but rather move between different Learning Environments.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Mathematics
Matemáticas
Matemática
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/article/view/600
10.23926/RPD.2526-2149.2018.v3.n1.p54-74.id193
url https://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/article/view/600
identifier_str_mv 10.23926/RPD.2526-2149.2018.v3.n1.p54-74.id193
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.cfs.ifmt.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/rpd/article/view/600/588
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 A Revista Prática Docente tem o direito de primeira publicação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 A Revista Prática Docente tem o direito de primeira publicação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Prática Docente
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Prática Docente
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Prática Docente (Journal Practice Teacher); Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): Janeiro a Junho de 2018; 54-74
Revista Prática Docente (Revista Práctica Docente); Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2018): Janeiro a Junho de 2018; 54-74
Revista Prática Docente; v. 3 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro a Junho de 2018; 54-74
2526-2149
reponame:Revista Prática Docente
instname:Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (IFMT)
instacron:IFMT
instname_str Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (IFMT)
instacron_str IFMT
institution IFMT
reponame_str Revista Prática Docente
collection Revista Prática Docente
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Prática Docente - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso (IFMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistapraticadocente@cfs.ifmt.edu.br||
_version_ 1797068944610164736