Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15324 |
Resumo: | Amazon forests account for ~25% of global land biomass and tropical tree species. In these forests, windthrows (i.e., snapped and uprooted trees) are a major natural disturbance, but the rates and mechanisms of recovery are not known. To provide a predictive framework for understanding the effects of windthrows on forest structure and functional composition (DBH ≥10 cm), we quantified biomass recovery as a function of windthrow severity (i.e., fraction of windthrow tree mortality on Landsat pixels, ranging from 0%–70%) and time since disturbance for terra-firme forests in the Central Amazon. Forest monitoring allowed insights into the processes and mechanisms driving the net biomass change (i.e., increment minus loss) and shifts in functional composition. Windthrown areas recovering for between 4–27 years had biomass stocks as low as 65.2–91.7 Mg/ha or 23%–38% of those in nearby undisturbed forests (~255.6 Mg/ha, all sites). Even low windthrow severities (4%–20% tree mortality) caused decadal changes in biomass stocks and structure. While rates of biomass increment in recovering vegetation were nearly double (6.3 ± 1.4 Mg ha− 1 year− 1) those of undisturbed forests (~3.7 Mg ha− 1 year− 1), biomass loss due to post-windthrow mortality was high (up to −7.5 ± 8.7 Mg ha− 1 year− 1, 8.5 years since disturbance) and unpredictable. Consequently, recovery to 90% of “pre-disturbance” biomass takes up to 40 years. Resprouting trees contributed little to biomass recovery. Instead, light-demanding, low-density genera (e.g., Cecropia, Inga, Miconia, Pourouma, Tachigali, and Tapirira) were favored, resulting in substantial post-windthrow species turnover. Shifts in functional composition demonstrate that windthrows affect the resilience of live tree biomass by favoring soft-wooded species with shorter life spans that are more vulnerable to future disturbances. As the time required for forests to recover biomass is likely similar to the recurrence interval of windthrows triggering succession, windthrows have the potential to control landscape biomass/carbon dynamics and functional composition in Amazon forests. ©2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
id |
INPA-2_2f787bd73e2ee41fb9cfe328c79a4a46 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/15324 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Marra, Daniel MagnaboscoTrumbore, Susan ElizabethHiguchi, NiroRibeiro, Gabriel Henrique Pires de MelloNegrón-Juárez, Robinson I.Holzwarth, Frédéric M.Rifai, Sami WalidSantos, Joaquim dosLima, Adriano José NogueiraKinupp, Valdely FerreiraChambers, Jeffrey QuintinWirth, Christian B.2020-05-07T23:19:15Z2020-05-07T23:19:15Z2018https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1532410.1111/gcb.14457Amazon forests account for ~25% of global land biomass and tropical tree species. In these forests, windthrows (i.e., snapped and uprooted trees) are a major natural disturbance, but the rates and mechanisms of recovery are not known. To provide a predictive framework for understanding the effects of windthrows on forest structure and functional composition (DBH ≥10 cm), we quantified biomass recovery as a function of windthrow severity (i.e., fraction of windthrow tree mortality on Landsat pixels, ranging from 0%–70%) and time since disturbance for terra-firme forests in the Central Amazon. Forest monitoring allowed insights into the processes and mechanisms driving the net biomass change (i.e., increment minus loss) and shifts in functional composition. Windthrown areas recovering for between 4–27 years had biomass stocks as low as 65.2–91.7 Mg/ha or 23%–38% of those in nearby undisturbed forests (~255.6 Mg/ha, all sites). Even low windthrow severities (4%–20% tree mortality) caused decadal changes in biomass stocks and structure. While rates of biomass increment in recovering vegetation were nearly double (6.3 ± 1.4 Mg ha− 1 year− 1) those of undisturbed forests (~3.7 Mg ha− 1 year− 1), biomass loss due to post-windthrow mortality was high (up to −7.5 ± 8.7 Mg ha− 1 year− 1, 8.5 years since disturbance) and unpredictable. Consequently, recovery to 90% of “pre-disturbance” biomass takes up to 40 years. Resprouting trees contributed little to biomass recovery. Instead, light-demanding, low-density genera (e.g., Cecropia, Inga, Miconia, Pourouma, Tachigali, and Tapirira) were favored, resulting in substantial post-windthrow species turnover. Shifts in functional composition demonstrate that windthrows affect the resilience of live tree biomass by favoring soft-wooded species with shorter life spans that are more vulnerable to future disturbances. As the time required for forests to recover biomass is likely similar to the recurrence interval of windthrows triggering succession, windthrows have the potential to control landscape biomass/carbon dynamics and functional composition in Amazon forests. ©2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons LtdVolume 24, Número 12, Pags. 5867-5881Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBiodiversityBiogeochemical CycleBiomassForest EcosystemFunctional GroupLandsatMoralityTropical ForestAmazoniaCecropiaIngaMiconiaPouroumaTachigaliTapiriraCarbonBiomassBrasilForestTreeTropic ClimateWindBiomassBrasilCarbonForestsTreesTropical ClimateWindWindthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forestsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleGlobal Change Biologyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf2930821https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15324/1/artigo-inpa.pdfe24491f0df3de3940be4b42c35432905MD511/153242020-07-14 11:08:12.539oai:repositorio:1/15324Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T15:08:12Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
title |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
spellingShingle |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests Marra, Daniel Magnabosco Biodiversity Biogeochemical Cycle Biomass Forest Ecosystem Functional Group Landsat Morality Tropical Forest Amazonia Cecropia Inga Miconia Pourouma Tachigali Tapirira Carbon Biomass Brasil Forest Tree Tropic Climate Wind Biomass Brasil Carbon Forests Trees Tropical Climate Wind |
title_short |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
title_full |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
title_fullStr |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
title_sort |
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests |
author |
Marra, Daniel Magnabosco |
author_facet |
Marra, Daniel Magnabosco Trumbore, Susan Elizabeth Higuchi, Niro Ribeiro, Gabriel Henrique Pires de Mello Negrón-Juárez, Robinson I. Holzwarth, Frédéric M. Rifai, Sami Walid Santos, Joaquim dos Lima, Adriano José Nogueira Kinupp, Valdely Ferreira Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin Wirth, Christian B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Trumbore, Susan Elizabeth Higuchi, Niro Ribeiro, Gabriel Henrique Pires de Mello Negrón-Juárez, Robinson I. Holzwarth, Frédéric M. Rifai, Sami Walid Santos, Joaquim dos Lima, Adriano José Nogueira Kinupp, Valdely Ferreira Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin Wirth, Christian B. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marra, Daniel Magnabosco Trumbore, Susan Elizabeth Higuchi, Niro Ribeiro, Gabriel Henrique Pires de Mello Negrón-Juárez, Robinson I. Holzwarth, Frédéric M. Rifai, Sami Walid Santos, Joaquim dos Lima, Adriano José Nogueira Kinupp, Valdely Ferreira Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin Wirth, Christian B. |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversity Biogeochemical Cycle Biomass Forest Ecosystem Functional Group Landsat Morality Tropical Forest Amazonia Cecropia Inga Miconia Pourouma Tachigali Tapirira Carbon Biomass Brasil Forest Tree Tropic Climate Wind Biomass Brasil Carbon Forests Trees Tropical Climate Wind |
topic |
Biodiversity Biogeochemical Cycle Biomass Forest Ecosystem Functional Group Landsat Morality Tropical Forest Amazonia Cecropia Inga Miconia Pourouma Tachigali Tapirira Carbon Biomass Brasil Forest Tree Tropic Climate Wind Biomass Brasil Carbon Forests Trees Tropical Climate Wind |
description |
Amazon forests account for ~25% of global land biomass and tropical tree species. In these forests, windthrows (i.e., snapped and uprooted trees) are a major natural disturbance, but the rates and mechanisms of recovery are not known. To provide a predictive framework for understanding the effects of windthrows on forest structure and functional composition (DBH ≥10 cm), we quantified biomass recovery as a function of windthrow severity (i.e., fraction of windthrow tree mortality on Landsat pixels, ranging from 0%–70%) and time since disturbance for terra-firme forests in the Central Amazon. Forest monitoring allowed insights into the processes and mechanisms driving the net biomass change (i.e., increment minus loss) and shifts in functional composition. Windthrown areas recovering for between 4–27 years had biomass stocks as low as 65.2–91.7 Mg/ha or 23%–38% of those in nearby undisturbed forests (~255.6 Mg/ha, all sites). Even low windthrow severities (4%–20% tree mortality) caused decadal changes in biomass stocks and structure. While rates of biomass increment in recovering vegetation were nearly double (6.3 ± 1.4 Mg ha− 1 year− 1) those of undisturbed forests (~3.7 Mg ha− 1 year− 1), biomass loss due to post-windthrow mortality was high (up to −7.5 ± 8.7 Mg ha− 1 year− 1, 8.5 years since disturbance) and unpredictable. Consequently, recovery to 90% of “pre-disturbance” biomass takes up to 40 years. Resprouting trees contributed little to biomass recovery. Instead, light-demanding, low-density genera (e.g., Cecropia, Inga, Miconia, Pourouma, Tachigali, and Tapirira) were favored, resulting in substantial post-windthrow species turnover. Shifts in functional composition demonstrate that windthrows affect the resilience of live tree biomass by favoring soft-wooded species with shorter life spans that are more vulnerable to future disturbances. As the time required for forests to recover biomass is likely similar to the recurrence interval of windthrows triggering succession, windthrows have the potential to control landscape biomass/carbon dynamics and functional composition in Amazon forests. ©2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T23:19:15Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T23:19:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15324 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1111/gcb.14457 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15324 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1111/gcb.14457 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 24, Número 12, Pags. 5867-5881 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Global Change Biology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Global Change Biology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15324/1/artigo-inpa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e24491f0df3de3940be4b42c35432905 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928902374588416 |