Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ROMO, Manuela
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7455
Resumo: It is a social challenge for the culture of the beginning of the millennium to get as soon as possible the presence, under conditions of equality, of women in activities of creative production. However, until now there have been few works that have addressed the issue of the reduced presence of women in activities related to the so-called “big-creativity”. The article analyzes the social constraints that make it diffi cult for women to reach the level of excellence in the development of their creative careers. From the construct “locus of creativity” of Csikszentmihalyi, it is argued about the reasons for the diffi culty of women to be in that “locus” due to the diffi culty of accessing domains or disciplines and the lack of recognition of their contributions by the fi elds, that is, those people responsible for admitting the new contributions in the domain, since women are usually absent from them. The forms taken by discrimination such as the “glass roof“ or the “scissors effect“ are also analyzed. Finally, it is argued about the difficulties of achieving excellence due also to the incorporation that women themselves make of the prejudices that limit them from childhood, where the differential socialization between boys and girls begins.
id PUC_CAMP-3_5262c5d6ef4a337dae88994ae9fcc4ad
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/7455
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-3
network_name_str Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in womenTiene género la creatividad? Obstáculos a la excelencia en mujeresCreativityCsikszentmihalyiGender identityGlass ceilingCreatividadCsikszentmihalyiIdentidad de géneroTecho de cristalIt is a social challenge for the culture of the beginning of the millennium to get as soon as possible the presence, under conditions of equality, of women in activities of creative production. However, until now there have been few works that have addressed the issue of the reduced presence of women in activities related to the so-called “big-creativity”. The article analyzes the social constraints that make it diffi cult for women to reach the level of excellence in the development of their creative careers. From the construct “locus of creativity” of Csikszentmihalyi, it is argued about the reasons for the diffi culty of women to be in that “locus” due to the diffi culty of accessing domains or disciplines and the lack of recognition of their contributions by the fi elds, that is, those people responsible for admitting the new contributions in the domain, since women are usually absent from them. The forms taken by discrimination such as the “glass roof“ or the “scissors effect“ are also analyzed. Finally, it is argued about the difficulties of achieving excellence due also to the incorporation that women themselves make of the prejudices that limit them from childhood, where the differential socialization between boys and girls begins.Es un reto social para la cultura de comienzo del milenio conseguir cuanto antes la presencia, en condiciones de igualdad, de mujeres en actividades de producción creativa. Sin embargo, hasta ahora han sido pocos los trabajos que han abordado  la cuestión de la reducida presencia de mujeres en actividades relacionadas con la llamada “big-creativity”. En el artículo se analizan los condicionantes sociales que difi cultan a las mujeres alcanzar el nivel de excelencia en el desarrollo de sus carreras creativas. Desde el constructo “locus de la creatividad” de Csikszentmihalyi, se argumenta sobre las razones de la dificultad de las mujeres para estar en ese “locus” por la dificultad de acceder a los campos o disciplinas y por la ausencia de reconocimiento de sus aportaciones por parte de los ámbitos, es decir, los responsables de admitir em los campos los nuevas aportaciones, al estar ausentes generalmente las mujeres de los mismos. Se analizan también las formas que toma la discriminación como “el techo de cristal o el efecto tijera”. Finalmente se argumenta sobre las dificultades de alcanzar la excelencia debido también a la incorporación que las propias mujeres hacen de los prejuicios que las limitan desde la infancia donde comienza la socialización diferencial entre niños y niñas.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2023-02-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7455Psychological Studies; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2018): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 35 Núm. 3 (2018): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; v. 35 n. 3 (2018): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)1982-0275reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPspahttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7455/5009Copyright (c) 2023 Manuela ROMOhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ROMO, Manuela2023-02-24T15:24:22Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/7455Revistahttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudosPRIhttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudos/oaisbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br1982-02750103-166Xopendoar:2023-02-24T15:24:22Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
Tiene género la creatividad? Obstáculos a la excelencia en mujeres
title Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
spellingShingle Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
ROMO, Manuela
Creativity
Csikszentmihalyi
Gender identity
Glass ceiling
Creatividad
Csikszentmihalyi
Identidad de género
Techo de cristal
title_short Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
title_full Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
title_fullStr Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
title_full_unstemmed Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
title_sort Does creativity have a gender? Obstacles to excellence in women
author ROMO, Manuela
author_facet ROMO, Manuela
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ROMO, Manuela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Creativity
Csikszentmihalyi
Gender identity
Glass ceiling
Creatividad
Csikszentmihalyi
Identidad de género
Techo de cristal
topic Creativity
Csikszentmihalyi
Gender identity
Glass ceiling
Creatividad
Csikszentmihalyi
Identidad de género
Techo de cristal
description It is a social challenge for the culture of the beginning of the millennium to get as soon as possible the presence, under conditions of equality, of women in activities of creative production. However, until now there have been few works that have addressed the issue of the reduced presence of women in activities related to the so-called “big-creativity”. The article analyzes the social constraints that make it diffi cult for women to reach the level of excellence in the development of their creative careers. From the construct “locus of creativity” of Csikszentmihalyi, it is argued about the reasons for the diffi culty of women to be in that “locus” due to the diffi culty of accessing domains or disciplines and the lack of recognition of their contributions by the fi elds, that is, those people responsible for admitting the new contributions in the domain, since women are usually absent from them. The forms taken by discrimination such as the “glass roof“ or the “scissors effect“ are also analyzed. Finally, it is argued about the difficulties of achieving excellence due also to the incorporation that women themselves make of the prejudices that limit them from childhood, where the differential socialization between boys and girls begins.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7455
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7455
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7455/5009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Manuela ROMO
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Manuela ROMO
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychological Studies; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2018): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 35 Núm. 3 (2018): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Estudos de Psicologia; v. 35 n. 3 (2018): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
1982-0275
reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
collection Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799126018550661120