The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo, Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Transinformação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717
Resumo: The Friendship Paradox is a phenomenon which states that most people have fewer friends than their own friends, and its generalization has been proposed in the last three decades by several scientific papers. Our study is focused on the academic environment, and seeks to determine whether or not the impression that individuals may have concerning invitations to take part in oral defenses is justifiable. This involved testing two hypotheses with regard to academic committee members: “The Invitee Paradox” (in terms of the person who is invited); and “The Inviter Paradox” (in terms of the person who extends the invitation). The paradoxes were assessed by designing invitation networks, both weighted and unweighted, which represent a dual relationship in which an invitation originates from an “inviter” and is extended to an “invitee”. We then tested the hypotheses with the aid of two real-world open access datasets from online academic repositories: (1) American (Brazilian Capes Catalog); and (2) European (French STAR Deposit). Our results showed that only “The Invitee Paradox” was true. We also explored possible relations between our proposed measurement of the invitation paradoxes and the PageRank metric, as to evaluate the relative importance of members in the invitation networks.
id PUC_CAMP-4_d26910f422744e9b5678bc1084bd466c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6717
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-4
network_name_str Transinformação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committeesO Paradoxo da Amizade na formação de bancas acadêmicasAcademic Committees Friendship ParadoxOral DefensesScientific CollaborationBancas Acadêmicas Paradoxo da AmizadeDefesas OraisColaboração CientíficaThe Friendship Paradox is a phenomenon which states that most people have fewer friends than their own friends, and its generalization has been proposed in the last three decades by several scientific papers. Our study is focused on the academic environment, and seeks to determine whether or not the impression that individuals may have concerning invitations to take part in oral defenses is justifiable. This involved testing two hypotheses with regard to academic committee members: “The Invitee Paradox” (in terms of the person who is invited); and “The Inviter Paradox” (in terms of the person who extends the invitation). The paradoxes were assessed by designing invitation networks, both weighted and unweighted, which represent a dual relationship in which an invitation originates from an “inviter” and is extended to an “invitee”. We then tested the hypotheses with the aid of two real-world open access datasets from online academic repositories: (1) American (Brazilian Capes Catalog); and (2) European (French STAR Deposit). Our results showed that only “The Invitee Paradox” was true. We also explored possible relations between our proposed measurement of the invitation paradoxes and the PageRank metric, as to evaluate the relative importance of members in the invitation networks.O Paradoxo da Amizade é um fenômeno que afirma que a maioria das pessoas tem menos amigos que os seus próprios amigos, e sua generalização tem sido proposta nas últimas três décadas por vários artigos científicos. Nosso estudo é focado no ambiente acadêmico, e buscadeterminar se a impressão que indivíduos podem ter referente a convites para participar de defesasorais é justificável. Isso envolveu o teste de duas hipóteses em relação aos membros de bancasacadêmicas: “O Paradoxo do Convidado” (em termos da pessoa que é convidada); e o “O Paradoxo do Convidador” (em termos da pessoa que oferece o convite). Os paradoxos foram avaliadosprojetando redes de convites, tanto ponderadas quanto não ponderadas, que representam relacionamentos duais nos quais um convite se origina de um “convidador” e é oferecido a um “convidado”. Testamos, então, as hipóteses com o auxílio de dois conjuntos de dados reais de acesso livre de repositórios acadêmicos online: (1) americano (Catálogo Brasileiro da Capes); e (2) europeu (Depósito STAR Francês). Nossos resultados mostraram que somente o “O Paradoxo do Convidado” foi verdadeiro. Também exploramos possíveis relações entre a medição proposta dos paradoxos de convites e a métrica PageRank, a fim de avaliar a importância relativa dos membros nas redes de convites.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2023-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtículo revisado por paresAvaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14Transinformação; v. 35 (2023); 1-142318-08890103-3786reponame:Transinformação (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717/6399Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPloeger Mansueli, Victor AlexandreFornaziero Segura Ramos, DiogoPascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús2024-04-02T12:31:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6717Revistahttp://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/transinfo/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br2318-08890103-3786opendoar:2024-04-02T12:31:59Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
O Paradoxo da Amizade na formação de bancas acadêmicas
title The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
spellingShingle The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre
Academic Committees
Friendship Paradox
Oral Defenses
Scientific Collaboration
Bancas Acadêmicas
Paradoxo da Amizade
Defesas Orais
Colaboração Científica
title_short The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
title_full The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
title_fullStr The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
title_full_unstemmed The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
title_sort The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees
author Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre
author_facet Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre
Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo
Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús
author_role author
author2 Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo
Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ploeger Mansueli, Victor Alexandre
Fornaziero Segura Ramos, Diogo
Pascual Mena-Chalco, Jesús
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Academic Committees
Friendship Paradox
Oral Defenses
Scientific Collaboration
Bancas Acadêmicas
Paradoxo da Amizade
Defesas Orais
Colaboração Científica
topic Academic Committees
Friendship Paradox
Oral Defenses
Scientific Collaboration
Bancas Acadêmicas
Paradoxo da Amizade
Defesas Orais
Colaboração Científica
description The Friendship Paradox is a phenomenon which states that most people have fewer friends than their own friends, and its generalization has been proposed in the last three decades by several scientific papers. Our study is focused on the academic environment, and seeks to determine whether or not the impression that individuals may have concerning invitations to take part in oral defenses is justifiable. This involved testing two hypotheses with regard to academic committee members: “The Invitee Paradox” (in terms of the person who is invited); and “The Inviter Paradox” (in terms of the person who extends the invitation). The paradoxes were assessed by designing invitation networks, both weighted and unweighted, which represent a dual relationship in which an invitation originates from an “inviter” and is extended to an “invitee”. We then tested the hypotheses with the aid of two real-world open access datasets from online academic repositories: (1) American (Brazilian Capes Catalog); and (2) European (French STAR Deposit). Our results showed that only “The Invitee Paradox” was true. We also explored possible relations between our proposed measurement of the invitation paradoxes and the PageRank metric, as to evaluate the relative importance of members in the invitation networks.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artículo revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/6717/6399
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14
Transinformação; Vol. 35 (2023); 1-14
Transinformação; v. 35 (2023); 1-14
2318-0889
0103-3786
reponame:Transinformação (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Transinformação (Online)
collection Transinformação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799125986808168448