Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barros, Ev'Ângela Batista Rodrigues de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pereira, Sara Izabela Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/32041
Resumo: This article aims to present the results of the research that evaluated ChatGPT's ability to revise texts, not only to identify and correct grammatical errors, but to perceive broader aspects relating to discursive sphere to which the texts in focus were integrated. It was used an exploratory, bibliographic, and qualitative research as conceived by Gil (2017). We proposed to the algorithm three authentic texts containing deviations of different natures,  grammatical and discursive, to be reviewed, corrected, enhanced, and evaluated, separately. Thus, based on an interactionist and socio-discursive approach (Volochinov, 2017; Sobral and Barbosa, 2019; Rodrigues, 2015; Salgado, 2013), we assessed ChatGPT's capacity to work with texts. The results indicated that it demonstrated notable abilities in intervening and improving texts, in the sphere of gramatical surface, but he also made mistakes. This shows us that textual review does not dispense with human oversight, especially when dealing with more complex discursive issues of  a discursive nature. It is concluded that ChatGPT can be a useful tool to improve textual review, but its performance is not capable of considering the author’s style and intention, as well as the nature of the speech in question.
id PUC_MINS-7_b01bd6b782b6f2a0325e6e678ae173f6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32041
network_acronym_str PUC_MINS-7
network_name_str Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Textual reviewing in ChatGPT timesA revisão textual em tempos de ChatGPTtextual reviewingchatgptartificial intelligencerevisão textualchatgptinteligência artificialThis article aims to present the results of the research that evaluated ChatGPT's ability to revise texts, not only to identify and correct grammatical errors, but to perceive broader aspects relating to discursive sphere to which the texts in focus were integrated. It was used an exploratory, bibliographic, and qualitative research as conceived by Gil (2017). We proposed to the algorithm three authentic texts containing deviations of different natures,  grammatical and discursive, to be reviewed, corrected, enhanced, and evaluated, separately. Thus, based on an interactionist and socio-discursive approach (Volochinov, 2017; Sobral and Barbosa, 2019; Rodrigues, 2015; Salgado, 2013), we assessed ChatGPT's capacity to work with texts. The results indicated that it demonstrated notable abilities in intervening and improving texts, in the sphere of gramatical surface, but he also made mistakes. This shows us that textual review does not dispense with human oversight, especially when dealing with more complex discursive issues of  a discursive nature. It is concluded that ChatGPT can be a useful tool to improve textual review, but its performance is not capable of considering the author’s style and intention, as well as the nature of the speech in question.Este artigo tem como objetivo expor os resultados de pesquisa que avaliou a capacidade do ChatGPT em revisar textos, não apenas em identificar e corrigir erros gramaticais, mas de perceber aspectos mais amplos referentes à esfera discursiva a que se integravam os exemplares em foco.  Foi utilizada uma pesquisa exploratória, bibliográfica e qualitativa, segundo concebe Gil (2017). Propusemos ao algoritmo três textos autênticos com desvios de naturezas diversas, gramaticais e discursivas, para que fossem: revisados, corrigidos, aprimorados e avaliados, separadamente. E assim, com base em uma abordagem interacionista e sociodiscursiva (Volóchinov, 2017; Sobral e Barbosa, 2019; Rodrigues, 2015; Salgado, 2013), avaliamos a capacidade do ChatGPT em trabalhar com esses textos. Os resultados indicaram que ele apresentou habilidades notáveis na intervenção e aprimoramento de textos, na esfera da superfície gramatical, porém também incorre em erros. Isso evidencia que a revisão textual não dispensa o olhar humano, especialmente ao lidar com questões mais complexas, de natureza discursiva. Conclui-se que o ChatGPT pode ser uma ferramenta útil para aprimorar a revisão textual, mas sua atuação não é capaz de considerar o estilo e a intenção do autor, bem como a natureza do discurso em questão.Editora PUC Minas2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/3204110.5752/P.2358-3231.2023n44p163-189Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaios; n. 44 (2023): Estudos linguísticos e os seus diferentes quadros teóricos ; 163-1892358-3231reponame:Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/32041/21963Copyright (c) 2023 Editora PUC Minashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarros, Ev'Ângela Batista Rodrigues de Pereira, Sara Izabela Alves 2024-08-20T14:33:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32041Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/PUBhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/oaicespuc@pucminas.br||cespuc@pucminas.br2358-32311516-4020opendoar:2024-08-20T14:33:34Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
A revisão textual em tempos de ChatGPT
title Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
spellingShingle Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
Barros, Ev'Ângela Batista Rodrigues de
textual reviewing
chatgpt
artificial intelligence
revisão textual
chatgpt
inteligência artificial
title_short Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
title_full Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
title_fullStr Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
title_full_unstemmed Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
title_sort Textual reviewing in ChatGPT times
author Barros, Ev'Ângela Batista Rodrigues de
author_facet Barros, Ev'Ângela Batista Rodrigues de
Pereira, Sara Izabela Alves
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Sara Izabela Alves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barros, Ev'Ângela Batista Rodrigues de
Pereira, Sara Izabela Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv textual reviewing
chatgpt
artificial intelligence
revisão textual
chatgpt
inteligência artificial
topic textual reviewing
chatgpt
artificial intelligence
revisão textual
chatgpt
inteligência artificial
description This article aims to present the results of the research that evaluated ChatGPT's ability to revise texts, not only to identify and correct grammatical errors, but to perceive broader aspects relating to discursive sphere to which the texts in focus were integrated. It was used an exploratory, bibliographic, and qualitative research as conceived by Gil (2017). We proposed to the algorithm three authentic texts containing deviations of different natures,  grammatical and discursive, to be reviewed, corrected, enhanced, and evaluated, separately. Thus, based on an interactionist and socio-discursive approach (Volochinov, 2017; Sobral and Barbosa, 2019; Rodrigues, 2015; Salgado, 2013), we assessed ChatGPT's capacity to work with texts. The results indicated that it demonstrated notable abilities in intervening and improving texts, in the sphere of gramatical surface, but he also made mistakes. This shows us that textual review does not dispense with human oversight, especially when dealing with more complex discursive issues of  a discursive nature. It is concluded that ChatGPT can be a useful tool to improve textual review, but its performance is not capable of considering the author’s style and intention, as well as the nature of the speech in question.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/32041
10.5752/P.2358-3231.2023n44p163-189
url http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/32041
identifier_str_mv 10.5752/P.2358-3231.2023n44p163-189
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/cadernoscespuc/article/view/32041/21963
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Editora PUC Minas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Editora PUC Minas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa Série Ensaios; n. 44 (2023): Estudos linguísticos e os seus diferentes quadros teóricos ; 163-189
2358-3231
reponame:Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron:PUC_MINS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron_str PUC_MINS
institution PUC_MINS
reponame_str Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa
collection Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos CESPUC de Pesquisa - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cespuc@pucminas.br||cespuc@pucminas.br
_version_ 1816338858910941184