Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/26463 |
Resumo: | Introduction: In Brazil, the field of physical therapy education has undergone transformations with regard to curricular models. However, changes require conscious, collective efforts to align multiple interests and achieve agreed goals, which usually do not occur without conflicts. Objective: To verify the tensions involving the curricular changes in a physical therapy course based on the concepts of field, habitus and capital of Pierre Bourdieu. Method: Qualitative study with field observation and interviews with teachers using a semi-structured script and content analysis. Results: Much internal resistance was observed, which prevented the process of change from expanding. Key disciplines were created with the aim to interconnect the curriculum matrix and favor content integration; however, these disciplines functioned, ultimately, like any other. Conclusion: Teachers continued to play by the rules of the field unaware of its determinations, that is, the agents’ habitus reflected the existing structure without changing the practices, and the discipline curriculum remained linear. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_ca34436893b6f9de0d4e633c76d7b664 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/26463 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapyIntroduction: In Brazil, the field of physical therapy education has undergone transformations with regard to curricular models. However, changes require conscious, collective efforts to align multiple interests and achieve agreed goals, which usually do not occur without conflicts. Objective: To verify the tensions involving the curricular changes in a physical therapy course based on the concepts of field, habitus and capital of Pierre Bourdieu. Method: Qualitative study with field observation and interviews with teachers using a semi-structured script and content analysis. Results: Much internal resistance was observed, which prevented the process of change from expanding. Key disciplines were created with the aim to interconnect the curriculum matrix and favor content integration; however, these disciplines functioned, ultimately, like any other. Conclusion: Teachers continued to play by the rules of the field unaware of its determinations, that is, the agents’ habitus reflected the existing structure without changing the practices, and the discipline curriculum remained linear.Editora PUCPRESS2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2646310.1590/1980-5918.033.AO30Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 33 (2020): n. cont.; 1 - 9Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 33 (2020): n. cont.; 1 - 91980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/26463/pdfCopyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSumiya, AlbertoShizuko Fujisawa, DirceBasto de Albuquerque, Leila Marrach2022-03-07T19:02:40Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/26463Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:02:40Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
title |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
spellingShingle |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy Sumiya, Alberto |
title_short |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
title_full |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
title_fullStr |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
title_sort |
Interests, limits and possibilities of curricular structures in physical therapy |
author |
Sumiya, Alberto |
author_facet |
Sumiya, Alberto Shizuko Fujisawa, Dirce Basto de Albuquerque, Leila Marrach |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shizuko Fujisawa, Dirce Basto de Albuquerque, Leila Marrach |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sumiya, Alberto Shizuko Fujisawa, Dirce Basto de Albuquerque, Leila Marrach |
description |
Introduction: In Brazil, the field of physical therapy education has undergone transformations with regard to curricular models. However, changes require conscious, collective efforts to align multiple interests and achieve agreed goals, which usually do not occur without conflicts. Objective: To verify the tensions involving the curricular changes in a physical therapy course based on the concepts of field, habitus and capital of Pierre Bourdieu. Method: Qualitative study with field observation and interviews with teachers using a semi-structured script and content analysis. Results: Much internal resistance was observed, which prevented the process of change from expanding. Key disciplines were created with the aim to interconnect the curriculum matrix and favor content integration; however, these disciplines functioned, ultimately, like any other. Conclusion: Teachers continued to play by the rules of the field unaware of its determinations, that is, the agents’ habitus reflected the existing structure without changing the practices, and the discipline curriculum remained linear. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/26463 10.1590/1980-5918.033.AO30 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/26463 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5918.033.AO30 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/26463/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 33 (2020): n. cont.; 1 - 9 Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 33 (2020): n. cont.; 1 - 9 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138749087481856 |