“Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brandão, Elaine Reis
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lopes, Rebecca Faray Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28265
Resumo: The article aims to systematize and discuss the premises conducting therecent public debate in the Brazilian society regarding the inclusion of gender and sexuality-related contents in the National Education Plan. It is a documental socioanthropological research with documents extracted from public internet sources  between 2011-2017, comprising government bodies, non-governmental organizations, and several news sites. The social construction of gender and sexuality perspective is questioned for being disruptive to the family for certain religious and political segments, being its approach in the school considered inappropriate. Another view is based on the discrimination and violence suffered by the students, due to the persisting stigma and gender inequality in the school settings. Thus, such contents would aid in the educational process of coexistence with sexual, gender and racial diversity. In this debate, sociocultural and political dimension of gender and sexuality are affirmed. Intervenient aspects in the approval of public policies indicate difficulties to guarantee the secular State, denoting what Carrara refers as “new geography of evil and sexual danger” when discussing sexual policies and their peculiar styles of moral regulation.
id PUC_RS-17_b22dba3614fb4e81474ae6c4e52e87d1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28265
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-17
network_name_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan“Não é competência do professor ser sexólogo”: o debate público sobre gênero e sexualidade no Plano Nacional de EducaçãoGênero. Sexualidade. Educação. Política sexual. Moralidade.The article aims to systematize and discuss the premises conducting therecent public debate in the Brazilian society regarding the inclusion of gender and sexuality-related contents in the National Education Plan. It is a documental socioanthropological research with documents extracted from public internet sources  between 2011-2017, comprising government bodies, non-governmental organizations, and several news sites. The social construction of gender and sexuality perspective is questioned for being disruptive to the family for certain religious and political segments, being its approach in the school considered inappropriate. Another view is based on the discrimination and violence suffered by the students, due to the persisting stigma and gender inequality in the school settings. Thus, such contents would aid in the educational process of coexistence with sexual, gender and racial diversity. In this debate, sociocultural and political dimension of gender and sexuality are affirmed. Intervenient aspects in the approval of public policies indicate difficulties to guarantee the secular State, denoting what Carrara refers as “new geography of evil and sexual danger” when discussing sexual policies and their peculiar styles of moral regulation.O trabalho discute as premissas que regem o debate público na sociedade brasileira sobre a inclusão dos conteúdos relativos ao gênero e à sexualidade no Plano Nacional de Educação. Trata-se de pesquisa socioantropológica documental, com documentos extraídos de fontes públicas na internet, no período 2011-2017, compreendendo órgãos governamentais, organizações não governamentais, portais de notícias diversos. A perspectiva de construção social do gênero e da sexualidade é questionada por ser considerada disruptiva à família para certos segmentos religiosos e políticos, não devendo ser tratada na escola. Outra visão se apoia nas discriminações e violências sofridas por estudantes devido ao estigma e desigualdade de gênero persistente nos espaços escolares. Assim, tais conteúdos ajudariam no processo educativo de convivência com a diversidade sexual, de gênero, e racial. Nesse debate, a dimensão sociocultural e política do gênero e da sexualidade se afirmam. Aspectos intervenientes na aprovação das políticas públicas sinalizam dificuldades para se garantir o Estado laico, denotando o que Carrara designa como “nova geografia do mal e do perigo sexual” ao discutir as politicas sexuais e seus peculiares estilos de regulação moral.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2018-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/2826510.15448/1984-7289.2018.1.28265Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2018): Gender and Sexuality; 100-123Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2018): Gênero e Sexualidade; 100-123Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 18 n. 1 (2018): Gênero e Sexualidade; 100-1231984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2018.1reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28265/16655Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrandão, Elaine ReisLopes, Rebecca Faray Ferreira2019-02-28T15:07:22Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28265Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2019-02-28T15:07:22Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
“Não é competência do professor ser sexólogo”: o debate público sobre gênero e sexualidade no Plano Nacional de Educação
title “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
spellingShingle “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
Brandão, Elaine Reis
Gênero. Sexualidade. Educação. Política sexual. Moralidade.
title_short “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
title_full “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
title_fullStr “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
title_full_unstemmed “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
title_sort “Being a sexologist is not a teacher’s competence”: the public debate on gender and sexuality in the National Education Plan
author Brandão, Elaine Reis
author_facet Brandão, Elaine Reis
Lopes, Rebecca Faray Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Rebecca Faray Ferreira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brandão, Elaine Reis
Lopes, Rebecca Faray Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gênero. Sexualidade. Educação. Política sexual. Moralidade.
topic Gênero. Sexualidade. Educação. Política sexual. Moralidade.
description The article aims to systematize and discuss the premises conducting therecent public debate in the Brazilian society regarding the inclusion of gender and sexuality-related contents in the National Education Plan. It is a documental socioanthropological research with documents extracted from public internet sources  between 2011-2017, comprising government bodies, non-governmental organizations, and several news sites. The social construction of gender and sexuality perspective is questioned for being disruptive to the family for certain religious and political segments, being its approach in the school considered inappropriate. Another view is based on the discrimination and violence suffered by the students, due to the persisting stigma and gender inequality in the school settings. Thus, such contents would aid in the educational process of coexistence with sexual, gender and racial diversity. In this debate, sociocultural and political dimension of gender and sexuality are affirmed. Intervenient aspects in the approval of public policies indicate difficulties to guarantee the secular State, denoting what Carrara refers as “new geography of evil and sexual danger” when discussing sexual policies and their peculiar styles of moral regulation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28265
10.15448/1984-7289.2018.1.28265
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28265
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-7289.2018.1.28265
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/28265/16655
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2018): Gender and Sexuality; 100-123
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2018): Gênero e Sexualidade; 100-123
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 18 n. 1 (2018): Gênero e Sexualidade; 100-123
1984-7289
1519-6089
10.15448/1984-7289.2018.1
reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv civitas@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128807022526464

Registros relacionados