In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2296 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To compare the antimicrobial effect of Aloe vera in natura gel, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods: Forty Petri dishes containing agar blood culture medium were used. Ten paperdisks soaked in sterilized distilled water were placed in the center of ten Petri dishes (negative control). Microorganism strains were seeded on the other 30 Petri dishes, and 10 dishes received one central paper disk soaked in distilled water (positive control). The remaining 20 dishes received 4 disks per dish moistened in the following substances: distilled water; 2% chlorhexidine gel; 0.12% chlorhexidine gel; and Aloe vera in natura gel. After 60h, all groups were analyzed, and the microorganism growth inhibition halos were compared. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences of antimicrobial effect against E. faecalis among the tested substances, in the following descending order: 2% chlorhexidine gel; 0.12% chlorhexidine gel; Aloe vera in natura gel; and distilled water (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Aloe vera in natura gel had lower antimicrobial effect than both concentrations of chlorhexidine tested. Key words: Aloe; chlorhexidine; Enterococcus faecalis; in vitro |
id |
PUC_RS-22_8fb563d138b3febfff4b973f156b87fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/2296 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalisEfetividade in vitro de Aloe Vera in natura, gel de clorexidina a 0,12% e gel de clorexidina a 2% sobre Enterococccus faecalisAloechlorhexidineEnterococcus faecalisin vitroEndodonticsPurpose: To compare the antimicrobial effect of Aloe vera in natura gel, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods: Forty Petri dishes containing agar blood culture medium were used. Ten paperdisks soaked in sterilized distilled water were placed in the center of ten Petri dishes (negative control). Microorganism strains were seeded on the other 30 Petri dishes, and 10 dishes received one central paper disk soaked in distilled water (positive control). The remaining 20 dishes received 4 disks per dish moistened in the following substances: distilled water; 2% chlorhexidine gel; 0.12% chlorhexidine gel; and Aloe vera in natura gel. After 60h, all groups were analyzed, and the microorganism growth inhibition halos were compared. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences of antimicrobial effect against E. faecalis among the tested substances, in the following descending order: 2% chlorhexidine gel; 0.12% chlorhexidine gel; Aloe vera in natura gel; and distilled water (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Aloe vera in natura gel had lower antimicrobial effect than both concentrations of chlorhexidine tested. Key words: Aloe; chlorhexidine; Enterococcus faecalis; in vitroObjetivo: Comparar a ação de gel de Aloe vera in natura, gel de clorexidina a 0,12% e gel de clorexidina a 2% sobre Enterococccus faecalis. Metodologia: Utilizaram-se 40 placas Petri contendo o meio de cultura Ágar Sangue. Em 10 placas foram feitos poços no centro, com o auxílio do fundo de uma pipeta de vidro, onde foram depositados discos de papel absorvente embebidos em água destilada esterilizada (controle negativo). Em outras 10 placas, semearam-se os microrganismos Enterococccus faecalis (controle positivo). Nas 20 placas restantes, realizaram-se 4 poços nos diferentes quadrantes da placa e semearam-se os microrganismos, distribuíndo-se 4 discos umedecidos em cada substância, a saber: 1 em água destilada, 1 em gel de clorexidina a 2%, 1 em gel de clorexidina a 0,12% e 1 com gel de Aloe vera in natura. Os grupos foram analisados após 60h, comparando-se os halos de inibição de crescimento dos microrganismos. Resultados: Houve diferença estatística significativa de inibição para Enterococccus faecalis entre as substâncias, em ordem decrescente: gel de clorexidina a 2%, gel de clorexidina a 0,12%, gel de Aloe vera in natura e água destilada (P < 0,05). Conclusão: O gel de Aloe vera in natura teve efetividade antimicrobiana menor que as duas concentrações de clorexidina testadas. Palavras-chave: Aloe; babosa; clorexidina; Enterococcus faecalis; in vitroEDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2008-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articlein vitro; cell cultureapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2296Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2008); 283 - 286Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 23 n. 3 (2008); 283 - 2861980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2296/3192Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Delle VedoveFerreira, Weverton Rayder SilvaSemenoff-Segundo, AlexBiasoli, Eder Ricardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-18T10:39:58Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/2296Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-18T10:39:58Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis Efetividade in vitro de Aloe Vera in natura, gel de clorexidina a 0,12% e gel de clorexidina a 2% sobre Enterococccus faecalis |
title |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis |
spellingShingle |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Delle Vedove Aloe chlorhexidine Enterococcus faecalis in vitro Endodontics |
title_short |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis |
title_full |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis |
title_fullStr |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis |
title_sort |
In vitro effectiveness of Aloe Vera in natura, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococccus faecalis |
author |
Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Delle Vedove |
author_facet |
Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Delle Vedove Ferreira, Weverton Rayder Silva Semenoff-Segundo, Alex Biasoli, Eder Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Weverton Rayder Silva Semenoff-Segundo, Alex Biasoli, Eder Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Delle Vedove Ferreira, Weverton Rayder Silva Semenoff-Segundo, Alex Biasoli, Eder Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aloe chlorhexidine Enterococcus faecalis in vitro Endodontics |
topic |
Aloe chlorhexidine Enterococcus faecalis in vitro Endodontics |
description |
Purpose: To compare the antimicrobial effect of Aloe vera in natura gel, 0.12% chlorhexidine gel, and 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods: Forty Petri dishes containing agar blood culture medium were used. Ten paperdisks soaked in sterilized distilled water were placed in the center of ten Petri dishes (negative control). Microorganism strains were seeded on the other 30 Petri dishes, and 10 dishes received one central paper disk soaked in distilled water (positive control). The remaining 20 dishes received 4 disks per dish moistened in the following substances: distilled water; 2% chlorhexidine gel; 0.12% chlorhexidine gel; and Aloe vera in natura gel. After 60h, all groups were analyzed, and the microorganism growth inhibition halos were compared. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences of antimicrobial effect against E. faecalis among the tested substances, in the following descending order: 2% chlorhexidine gel; 0.12% chlorhexidine gel; Aloe vera in natura gel; and distilled water (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Aloe vera in natura gel had lower antimicrobial effect than both concentrations of chlorhexidine tested. Key words: Aloe; chlorhexidine; Enterococcus faecalis; in vitro |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-06-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article in vitro; cell culture |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2296 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2296 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2296/3192 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2008); 283 - 286 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 23 n. 3 (2008); 283 - 286 1980-6523 0102-9460 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820873803530240 |