Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Broilo, Josué Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sartori, Evandro Afonso, Mariano, Luiz Oscar Honorato, Corso, Leandro, Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28877
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This 3-D FEA study compared the stress distribution in two-implant mandibular overdentures as a function of implant position and attachment system (LA: locator attachment vs. BA: ball attachment).METHODS: Four models of mandibular overdentures were tested: M1-LA – with implants at the canine regions (standard implant position) and LA; M2-LA – with implants placed at the first premolar regions (distalized implant position) and LA; M1-BA – with standard implant position and BA; and M2-BA – with distalized implant position and BA. The geometric models were converted into finite element models. A 100 N axial load was applied at the first molar region. The von-Mises stress distribution was compared in selected points.RESULTS: The models with BA had pattern of stress distribution was more uniform along the implant axis than the ones with LA, although the stress magnitude was larger. The largest area of von Mises stresses on the alveolar ridge was in the models with standard implant distribution.CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the models with BA had better biomechanical behavior than the ones with LA. For both types of attachment, the models with increased inter-implant distance presented a smaller area of stress distribution in the perimplant cortical bone tissue than the standard implant position. 
id PUC_RS-22_acf820352cc29dbc783c357d8e8a6daa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28877
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment typesAnálise de elementos finitos em 3D de sobredentaduras mandibulares com diferentes posições de implante e tipos de encaixedental implantsimplant-supported overdenturebiomechanicsfinite element analysis.implantes dentáriossobredentadura sobre implantesbiomecânicaanálise de elementos finitos.OBJECTIVE: This 3-D FEA study compared the stress distribution in two-implant mandibular overdentures as a function of implant position and attachment system (LA: locator attachment vs. BA: ball attachment).METHODS: Four models of mandibular overdentures were tested: M1-LA – with implants at the canine regions (standard implant position) and LA; M2-LA – with implants placed at the first premolar regions (distalized implant position) and LA; M1-BA – with standard implant position and BA; and M2-BA – with distalized implant position and BA. The geometric models were converted into finite element models. A 100 N axial load was applied at the first molar region. The von-Mises stress distribution was compared in selected points.RESULTS: The models with BA had pattern of stress distribution was more uniform along the implant axis than the ones with LA, although the stress magnitude was larger. The largest area of von Mises stresses on the alveolar ridge was in the models with standard implant distribution.CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the models with BA had better biomechanical behavior than the ones with LA. For both types of attachment, the models with increased inter-implant distance presented a smaller area of stress distribution in the perimplant cortical bone tissue than the standard implant position. OBJETIVO: Este estudo de análise de elementos finitos em 3-D comparou a distribuição de tensão em sobredentaduras suportadas por implante em função da posição do implante e do sistema de encaixe (AA: tipo “locator” vs. BA: tipo “bola”)METODOLOGIA: Foram testados quatro modelos 3-D de sobredentadura com implante mandibular: M1-LA – com implantes nas regiões dos dentes caninos (posição padrão dos implantes) e LA; M2-LA – com implantes nas regiões dos dentes primeiros pré-molares (posição distalizada dos implantes) e LA; M1-BA – com posição padrão de implante e BA; e M2-BA – com posição distalizada dos implantes e BA. Os modelos geométricos foram convertidos em modelos de elementos finitos. Uma carga axial de 100 N foi aplicada na primeira região molar. A distribuição de estresses von Mises foi comparada em pontos selecionados.RESULTADOS: Os modelos com BA apresentaram padrão de distribuição de estresse mais uniforme ao longo do eixo do implante do que os modelos com LA, embora a magnitude do estresse tenha sido maior. A maior área de tensões no rebordo alveolar ocorreu nos modelos com posição padrão de implantes.CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados sugerem que os modelos com BA apresentaram melhor comportamento biomecânico do que aqueles com LA. Para ambos os encaixes, implantes distalizados apresentam uma menor área de distribuição de estresse no tecido ósseo cortical do que posicionamento padrão dos implantes.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2018-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2887710.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28877Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2017); 185-192Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 4 (2017); 185-1921980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2017.4reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28877/17010Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBroilo, Josué RicardoSartori, Evandro AfonsoMariano, Luiz Oscar HonoratoCorso, LeandroShinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai2018-07-25T17:43:17Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28877Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2018-07-25T17:43:17Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
Análise de elementos finitos em 3D de sobredentaduras mandibulares com diferentes posições de implante e tipos de encaixe
title Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
spellingShingle Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
Broilo, Josué Ricardo
dental implants
implant-supported overdenture
biomechanics
finite element analysis.
implantes dentários
sobredentadura sobre implantes
biomecânica
análise de elementos finitos.
title_short Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
title_full Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
title_fullStr Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
title_sort Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular overdentures with different implant positions and attachment types
author Broilo, Josué Ricardo
author_facet Broilo, Josué Ricardo
Sartori, Evandro Afonso
Mariano, Luiz Oscar Honorato
Corso, Leandro
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai
author_role author
author2 Sartori, Evandro Afonso
Mariano, Luiz Oscar Honorato
Corso, Leandro
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Broilo, Josué Ricardo
Sartori, Evandro Afonso
Mariano, Luiz Oscar Honorato
Corso, Leandro
Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dental implants
implant-supported overdenture
biomechanics
finite element analysis.
implantes dentários
sobredentadura sobre implantes
biomecânica
análise de elementos finitos.
topic dental implants
implant-supported overdenture
biomechanics
finite element analysis.
implantes dentários
sobredentadura sobre implantes
biomecânica
análise de elementos finitos.
description OBJECTIVE: This 3-D FEA study compared the stress distribution in two-implant mandibular overdentures as a function of implant position and attachment system (LA: locator attachment vs. BA: ball attachment).METHODS: Four models of mandibular overdentures were tested: M1-LA – with implants at the canine regions (standard implant position) and LA; M2-LA – with implants placed at the first premolar regions (distalized implant position) and LA; M1-BA – with standard implant position and BA; and M2-BA – with distalized implant position and BA. The geometric models were converted into finite element models. A 100 N axial load was applied at the first molar region. The von-Mises stress distribution was compared in selected points.RESULTS: The models with BA had pattern of stress distribution was more uniform along the implant axis than the ones with LA, although the stress magnitude was larger. The largest area of von Mises stresses on the alveolar ridge was in the models with standard implant distribution.CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the models with BA had better biomechanical behavior than the ones with LA. For both types of attachment, the models with increased inter-implant distance presented a smaller area of stress distribution in the perimplant cortical bone tissue than the standard implant position. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28877
10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28877
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28877
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28877
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28877/17010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Odonto Ciência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Odonto Ciência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2017); 185-192
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 4 (2017); 185-192
1980-6523
0102-9460
10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820877096058880