Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Calamita, Zamir
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Calamita, Andrea Bronhara Pelá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/24281
Resumo: Aims: To evaluate the prevalence of the main allergens found in allergic contact dermatitis among elderly and non-elderly patients.Methods: Retrospective study of the medical records of patients clinically diagnosed with contact dermatitis treated from August 2000 to January 2012 at the Allergy Outpatient Clinic of Marília Medical School and at an Allergy and Dermatology private clinic in Marília, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis, patch test performed during the study period, and no treatment with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressants. Age, sex, history of other types of allergy and allergens used were assessed. The patch test results were read 48 hours and 72 hours after application of the test chambers.Results: A total of 362 patients were included in the study: 60 elderly patients (aged 60 years or older) and 302 non-elderly patients. In addition to contact dermatitis, other types of allergies were observed in 20 (33.3%) of elderly patients and in 113 (37.4%) of non-elderly patients (p=0.54). There were 162 positive reactions on the patch test among elderly patients and 738 positive reactions among non-elderly patients (p=0.24). Strong positive reactions were present in 41 (68.3%) elderly patients and in 156 (51.6%) non-elderly patients (p=0.02). Strong and very strong positive reactions, when assessed together, were detected in 44 (73.3%) elderly patients and in 214 (70.8%) non-elderly patients (p=0.69). The most common allergens were nickel sulfate (in 33.3% of elderly and 38% of non-elderly patients) and fragrance mix (in 25% of elderly and 27.8% of non-elderly patients), with no statistical difference between the groups.Conclusions: There was a high rate of positive reactions on the patch test among patients with contact dermatitis, with no difference between elderly and non-elderly individuals, and the most common allergens were nickel sulfate and fragrance mix. Therefore, it is important that allergy to nickel and fragrances be included in the etiologic investigation of contact dermatitis, regardless of age.
id PUC_RS-25_8c5fe13f63e24876fa468d5b422804d2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/24281
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-25
network_name_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitisPrincipais sensibilizantes em pacientes idosos e não idosos com dermatite de contatodermatitiscontactelderlyfragrancesnickelpatch tests.dermatite de contatoidosoperfumesníqueltestes do emplastro.Aims: To evaluate the prevalence of the main allergens found in allergic contact dermatitis among elderly and non-elderly patients.Methods: Retrospective study of the medical records of patients clinically diagnosed with contact dermatitis treated from August 2000 to January 2012 at the Allergy Outpatient Clinic of Marília Medical School and at an Allergy and Dermatology private clinic in Marília, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis, patch test performed during the study period, and no treatment with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressants. Age, sex, history of other types of allergy and allergens used were assessed. The patch test results were read 48 hours and 72 hours after application of the test chambers.Results: A total of 362 patients were included in the study: 60 elderly patients (aged 60 years or older) and 302 non-elderly patients. In addition to contact dermatitis, other types of allergies were observed in 20 (33.3%) of elderly patients and in 113 (37.4%) of non-elderly patients (p=0.54). There were 162 positive reactions on the patch test among elderly patients and 738 positive reactions among non-elderly patients (p=0.24). Strong positive reactions were present in 41 (68.3%) elderly patients and in 156 (51.6%) non-elderly patients (p=0.02). Strong and very strong positive reactions, when assessed together, were detected in 44 (73.3%) elderly patients and in 214 (70.8%) non-elderly patients (p=0.69). The most common allergens were nickel sulfate (in 33.3% of elderly and 38% of non-elderly patients) and fragrance mix (in 25% of elderly and 27.8% of non-elderly patients), with no statistical difference between the groups.Conclusions: There was a high rate of positive reactions on the patch test among patients with contact dermatitis, with no difference between elderly and non-elderly individuals, and the most common allergens were nickel sulfate and fragrance mix. Therefore, it is important that allergy to nickel and fragrances be included in the etiologic investigation of contact dermatitis, regardless of age.Objetivos: Avaliar a prevalência dos principais sensibilizantes da dermatite de contato alérgica em pacientes idosos e não idosos.Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo com revisão dos prontuários de pacientes com diagnóstico clínico de dermatite de contato, atendidos no período de agosto de 2000 a janeiro de 2012 no Ambulatório de Alergia da Faculdade de Medicina de Marília e em clínica particular de Alergia e Dermatologia na cidade de Marília, estado de São Paulo. Os critérios de inclusão foram diagnóstico clínico de dermatite de contato, realização de teste cutâneo de contato (patch test) no período do estudo e não uso de corticosteroide sistêmico ou outra medicação imunossupressora. Foram analisados idade, sexo, história de outros tipos de alergia e sensibilizantes utilizados. Os resultados do patch test foram lidos 48 horas e 72 horas após a colocação dos contensores.Resultados: Foram incluídos 362 pacientes, entre o quais 60 idosos (idade maior ou igual a 60 anos) e 302 não idosos. Além da dermatite de contato foram observados outros tipos de alergias em 20 (33,3%) dos idosos e em 113 (37,4%) dos não idosos (p=0,54). Houve um total de 162 reações positivas ao patch test entre os idosos e 738 reações positivas entre os não idosos (p=0,24). Quanto às reações positivas fortes ocorreram 41 (68,3%) entre os idosos e 156 (51,6%) entre os não idosos (p=0,02). Somando-se reações positivas fortes e muito fortes, foram 44 (73,3%) em idosos e 214 (70,8%) em não idosos (p=0,69). As substâncias mais sensibilizantes foram o sulfato de níquel (em 33,3% dos idosos e 38 % dos não idosos) e o perfume mix (em 25% dos idosos e 27,8% dos não idosos), sem diferença estatística entre os dois grupos etários.Conclusões: A taxa de positividade do patch test entre os pacientes com dermatite de contato foi alta, não havendo diferença entre idosos e não idosos, sendo o sulfato de níquel e o perfume mix as substâncias mais sensibilizantes. Na investigação etiológica da dermatite de contato deve-se pensar principalmente na possibilidade de sensibilização aos perfumes e ao níquel, independentemente da faixa etária.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2016-11-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/2428110.15448/1980-6108.2016.4.24281Scientia Medica; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2016); ID24281Scientia Medica; v. 26 n. 4 (2016); ID242811980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2016.4reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/24281/14986Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Medicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCalamita, ZamirCalamita, Andrea Bronhara Pelá2016-11-27T15:51:21Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/24281Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2016-11-27T15:51:21Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
Principais sensibilizantes em pacientes idosos e não idosos com dermatite de contato
title Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
spellingShingle Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
Calamita, Zamir
dermatitis
contact
elderly
fragrances
nickel
patch tests.
dermatite de contato
idoso
perfumes
níquel
testes do emplastro.
title_short Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
title_full Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
title_fullStr Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
title_full_unstemmed Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
title_sort Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
author Calamita, Zamir
author_facet Calamita, Zamir
Calamita, Andrea Bronhara Pelá
author_role author
author2 Calamita, Andrea Bronhara Pelá
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Calamita, Zamir
Calamita, Andrea Bronhara Pelá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dermatitis
contact
elderly
fragrances
nickel
patch tests.
dermatite de contato
idoso
perfumes
níquel
testes do emplastro.
topic dermatitis
contact
elderly
fragrances
nickel
patch tests.
dermatite de contato
idoso
perfumes
níquel
testes do emplastro.
description Aims: To evaluate the prevalence of the main allergens found in allergic contact dermatitis among elderly and non-elderly patients.Methods: Retrospective study of the medical records of patients clinically diagnosed with contact dermatitis treated from August 2000 to January 2012 at the Allergy Outpatient Clinic of Marília Medical School and at an Allergy and Dermatology private clinic in Marília, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis, patch test performed during the study period, and no treatment with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressants. Age, sex, history of other types of allergy and allergens used were assessed. The patch test results were read 48 hours and 72 hours after application of the test chambers.Results: A total of 362 patients were included in the study: 60 elderly patients (aged 60 years or older) and 302 non-elderly patients. In addition to contact dermatitis, other types of allergies were observed in 20 (33.3%) of elderly patients and in 113 (37.4%) of non-elderly patients (p=0.54). There were 162 positive reactions on the patch test among elderly patients and 738 positive reactions among non-elderly patients (p=0.24). Strong positive reactions were present in 41 (68.3%) elderly patients and in 156 (51.6%) non-elderly patients (p=0.02). Strong and very strong positive reactions, when assessed together, were detected in 44 (73.3%) elderly patients and in 214 (70.8%) non-elderly patients (p=0.69). The most common allergens were nickel sulfate (in 33.3% of elderly and 38% of non-elderly patients) and fragrance mix (in 25% of elderly and 27.8% of non-elderly patients), with no statistical difference between the groups.Conclusions: There was a high rate of positive reactions on the patch test among patients with contact dermatitis, with no difference between elderly and non-elderly individuals, and the most common allergens were nickel sulfate and fragrance mix. Therefore, it is important that allergy to nickel and fragrances be included in the etiologic investigation of contact dermatitis, regardless of age.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/24281
10.15448/1980-6108.2016.4.24281
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/24281
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6108.2016.4.24281
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/24281/14986
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Medica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Medica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2016); ID24281
Scientia Medica; v. 26 n. 4 (2016); ID24281
1980-6108
1806-5562
10.15448/1980-6108.2016.4
reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1809101751230398464