Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Danilo de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Pazzinatto, Marcella Ferraz, Oliveira, Maíra Caroline, Aragão, Fernando Amâncio, Albuquerque, Carlos Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/18539
Resumo: AIMS: To investigate the difference between elderly women with and without concern about falls in mobility and vertical ground reaction force during stair descent.METHODS: The study included older women assisted in the Centre for Physical Rehabilitation of the Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, aged between 60 and 75 years, without neurological and cardiovascular disease involving risk by the activities of the study. Women with orthoses for locomotion, osteoarticular diseases or surgery of lower limbs, and previous fall history were also excluded. The participants were divided into two groups, with and without concern about falls in daily activities, identified by the Falls Efficacy Scale International translated into Portuguese. To assess mobility, all subjects performed the Timed Up and Go Test. Ground reaction force was assessed by walking steps down five times to collect kinetic data (first peak of the vertical ground reaction force) through a force platform allocated in the fourth step of a staircase of seven steps. After confirmed normality of data, Student t test for independent samples was used to compare the groups.RESULTS: The sample was composed of seventeen elderly women with no concern about falling (aged 66.57±4.1 years) and sixteen elderly women with concerns about falling (aged 66.67±5.8 years). The group without concern with falls performed the Timed Up and Go Test faster (9.71±1,02 seconds) than  the group with concern about falls (11.5±1,04 seconds) (p=0.008). There was no difference between groups on the first peak of vertical ground reaction force (p=0.66).CONCLUSIONS: Elderly women with concern about falls had lower performance in the functional test than elderly women with no such concern. However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the kinetic variable.
id PUC_RS-25_9aa3a8527e40f7d84bd0fd599f2b695f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/18539
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-25
network_name_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descentInfluência da preocupação com quedas na mobilidade e na força de reação do solo em idosas durante descida de escadaELDERLYKINETICSLOCOMOTIONFEARQUESTIONNAIRES.IDOSOCINÉTICALOCOMOÇÃOMEDOQUESTIONÁRIOS.Ciências da SaúdeAIMS: To investigate the difference between elderly women with and without concern about falls in mobility and vertical ground reaction force during stair descent.METHODS: The study included older women assisted in the Centre for Physical Rehabilitation of the Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, aged between 60 and 75 years, without neurological and cardiovascular disease involving risk by the activities of the study. Women with orthoses for locomotion, osteoarticular diseases or surgery of lower limbs, and previous fall history were also excluded. The participants were divided into two groups, with and without concern about falls in daily activities, identified by the Falls Efficacy Scale International translated into Portuguese. To assess mobility, all subjects performed the Timed Up and Go Test. Ground reaction force was assessed by walking steps down five times to collect kinetic data (first peak of the vertical ground reaction force) through a force platform allocated in the fourth step of a staircase of seven steps. After confirmed normality of data, Student t test for independent samples was used to compare the groups.RESULTS: The sample was composed of seventeen elderly women with no concern about falling (aged 66.57±4.1 years) and sixteen elderly women with concerns about falling (aged 66.67±5.8 years). The group without concern with falls performed the Timed Up and Go Test faster (9.71±1,02 seconds) than  the group with concern about falls (11.5±1,04 seconds) (p=0.008). There was no difference between groups on the first peak of vertical ground reaction force (p=0.66).CONCLUSIONS: Elderly women with concern about falls had lower performance in the functional test than elderly women with no such concern. However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the kinetic variable.OBJETIVOS: Verificar a diferença entre idosas com e sem preocupação com quedas na mobilidade e na força vertical de reação do solo durante a descida de escada.MÉTODOS: O estudo incluiu idosas atendidas pelo Centro de Reabilitação Física da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná com idade entre 60 e 75 anos, sem doenças neurológicas e cardiovasculares que acarretassem risco pelas atividades do estudo. Foram excluídas também idosas com órteses para locomoção, doenças osteoarticulares ou cirurgias de membros inferiores e histórico de queda. As participantes foram divididas em dois grupos, com e sem preocupação com quedas em atividades diárias, identificados pela Falls Efficacy Scale International traduzida para o português. Para avaliação da mobilidade, todas as voluntárias realizaram o teste Timed Up and Go. A força de reação do solo foi avaliada em cinco descidas de escada para coleta dos dados cinéticos (primeiro pico da força vertical de reação do solo) através de uma plataforma de força alocada no quarto degrau de uma escada de sete degraus. Após ser confirmada a normalidade dos dados, o teste t de Student para amostras independentes foi utilizado para comparação entre os grupos.RESULTADOS: A amostra foi composta por dezessete idosas sem preocupação com quedas (idade de 66,57±4,1 anos) e dezesseis idosas com preocupação com quedas (idade de 66,67±5,8 anos). O grupo sem preocupação com quedas desempenhou o teste Timed Up and Go de forma mais veloz (9,71±1,02 segundos) comparado ao grupo preocupação com quedas (11,5±1,04 segundos) (p=0,008). Não houve diferença entre os grupos para o primeiro pico da força de reação do solo vertical (p=0,66).CONCLUSÕES: Idosas com preocupação com queda apresentaram menor desempenho no teste funcional do que idosas com ausência dessa preocupação. Entretanto, não houve diferença entre os grupos quanto à variável cinética.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2015-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/1853910.15448/1980-6108.2014.4.18539Scientia Medica; Vol. 24 No. 4 (2014); 361-367Scientia Medica; v. 24 n. 4 (2014); 361-3671980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2014.4reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/18539/12526Silva, Danilo de OliveiraPazzinatto, Marcella FerrazOliveira, Maíra CarolineAragão, Fernando AmâncioAlbuquerque, Carlos Eduardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-04-18T19:43:44Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/18539Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2017-04-18T19:43:44Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
Influência da preocupação com quedas na mobilidade e na força de reação do solo em idosas durante descida de escada
title Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
spellingShingle Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
Silva, Danilo de Oliveira
ELDERLY
KINETICS
LOCOMOTION
FEAR
QUESTIONNAIRES.
IDOSO
CINÉTICA
LOCOMOÇÃO
MEDO
QUESTIONÁRIOS.
Ciências da Saúde
title_short Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
title_full Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
title_fullStr Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
title_full_unstemmed Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
title_sort Influence of concern about falls in mobility and ground reaction force in elderly women's during stairs descent
author Silva, Danilo de Oliveira
author_facet Silva, Danilo de Oliveira
Pazzinatto, Marcella Ferraz
Oliveira, Maíra Caroline
Aragão, Fernando Amâncio
Albuquerque, Carlos Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Pazzinatto, Marcella Ferraz
Oliveira, Maíra Caroline
Aragão, Fernando Amâncio
Albuquerque, Carlos Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Danilo de Oliveira
Pazzinatto, Marcella Ferraz
Oliveira, Maíra Caroline
Aragão, Fernando Amâncio
Albuquerque, Carlos Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ELDERLY
KINETICS
LOCOMOTION
FEAR
QUESTIONNAIRES.
IDOSO
CINÉTICA
LOCOMOÇÃO
MEDO
QUESTIONÁRIOS.
Ciências da Saúde
topic ELDERLY
KINETICS
LOCOMOTION
FEAR
QUESTIONNAIRES.
IDOSO
CINÉTICA
LOCOMOÇÃO
MEDO
QUESTIONÁRIOS.
Ciências da Saúde
description AIMS: To investigate the difference between elderly women with and without concern about falls in mobility and vertical ground reaction force during stair descent.METHODS: The study included older women assisted in the Centre for Physical Rehabilitation of the Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, aged between 60 and 75 years, without neurological and cardiovascular disease involving risk by the activities of the study. Women with orthoses for locomotion, osteoarticular diseases or surgery of lower limbs, and previous fall history were also excluded. The participants were divided into two groups, with and without concern about falls in daily activities, identified by the Falls Efficacy Scale International translated into Portuguese. To assess mobility, all subjects performed the Timed Up and Go Test. Ground reaction force was assessed by walking steps down five times to collect kinetic data (first peak of the vertical ground reaction force) through a force platform allocated in the fourth step of a staircase of seven steps. After confirmed normality of data, Student t test for independent samples was used to compare the groups.RESULTS: The sample was composed of seventeen elderly women with no concern about falling (aged 66.57±4.1 years) and sixteen elderly women with concerns about falling (aged 66.67±5.8 years). The group without concern with falls performed the Timed Up and Go Test faster (9.71±1,02 seconds) than  the group with concern about falls (11.5±1,04 seconds) (p=0.008). There was no difference between groups on the first peak of vertical ground reaction force (p=0.66).CONCLUSIONS: Elderly women with concern about falls had lower performance in the functional test than elderly women with no such concern. However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the kinetic variable.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/18539
10.15448/1980-6108.2014.4.18539
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/18539
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6108.2014.4.18539
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/18539/12526
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica; Vol. 24 No. 4 (2014); 361-367
Scientia Medica; v. 24 n. 4 (2014); 361-367
1980-6108
1806-5562
10.15448/1980-6108.2014.4
reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1809101750613835776