Deveres e a responsabilidade civil aplicados ao administrador de sociedade anônima por ofensa ao artigo 158, II, da Lei 6.404/76

• Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues Neto, Deolindo Luiz
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6833
• topic: Administrador; Responsabilidade; Informação; Sociedade; Diligência; Lealdade; Boa-fé; Administrator; Responsibility; Information; Society; Diligence; Loyalty; Good faith; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

This study aims to discuss the liability of the corporation administrator, highlight the doctrinal and jurisprudential positions on the issue, as well as demonstrate the liability method to be applied in case that the Anonymous Society administrator disrespects the rule laid down in Article 158, II, of Law 6.404/76. The rationale for this study exists because of the aforementioned legal provision does not show which liability system applies to the case. Proof of this is that the subject is quite a stormy theme in doctrine and that only recently has begun to be viewed by the courts. Regarding the hypotheses raised in this paper, it is noted that part of the literature considers that the specific legal hypothesis of the study theme takes care of objective liability. Another portion arranged opposite to the first, says the administrator liability in such cases is subjective by reversing the burden of proof. There is also a third current, antagonistic to the above, which supports the application of classical subjective liability to the administrator that acts in breach of any law or statute. That is why a thorough study of the matter is necessary in order to define, with precision, what the is legal nature applied to the hypothesis proposed in this paper. The search result after the use of deductive scientific methodology indicates that classical subjective liability is the liability method to apply to the administrator of the company in case of offense to Article 158, II, of Law 6.404/76