BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nemo, François
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39562
Resumo: A morphemic-indicational description of English but (and French mais) is proposed, showing that the uses of but whose closer equivalents (and French translation) are almost, except, only, and without, together with the considerable variety of its connective uses, may be accounted for within a single semantic description. It is shown that but and mais do not encode metacommunicational indications about the relationship between the connected utterances, as is commonly believed and asserted, but provide a rather aspectual information/indication, whose interpretation is contextual and constructional. It is hence shown that but and mais’s description should be split into levels: the description of the indication encoded by the morpheme, which is active in all its uses, and the description of the constructional interpretation the indication receives when the morpheme is inserted in a given construction – such as But for X, Y or P but Q– or used in a specific context. The efficiency of this description is shown to support the Indicational-Indexical Semantics – IIS – framework approach. An introduction to this framework and to its relationship with the instructional semantics mainstream on the one hand, and with the procedural/conceptual distinction on the other hand, is also proposed.
id PUC_SP-4_ed45c23a084fbd15425a83a2e9e9a32e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39562
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-4
network_name_str DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
repository_id_str
spelling BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)Discourse ConnectivesPolysemyInstructional SemanticsA morphemic-indicational description of English but (and French mais) is proposed, showing that the uses of but whose closer equivalents (and French translation) are almost, except, only, and without, together with the considerable variety of its connective uses, may be accounted for within a single semantic description. It is shown that but and mais do not encode metacommunicational indications about the relationship between the connected utterances, as is commonly believed and asserted, but provide a rather aspectual information/indication, whose interpretation is contextual and constructional. It is hence shown that but and mais’s description should be split into levels: the description of the indication encoded by the morpheme, which is active in all its uses, and the description of the constructional interpretation the indication receives when the morpheme is inserted in a given construction – such as But for X, Y or P but Q– or used in a specific context. The efficiency of this description is shown to support the Indicational-Indexical Semantics – IIS – framework approach. An introduction to this framework and to its relationship with the instructional semantics mainstream on the one hand, and with the procedural/conceptual distinction on the other hand, is also proposed.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo2018-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39562DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 18 n. 3 (2002): NÚMERO ESPECIAL1678-460X0102-4450reponame:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicadainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39562/26790Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNemo, François2018-10-16T13:44:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39562Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/deltaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/oai||delta@pucsp.br1678-460X1678-460Xopendoar:2018-10-16T13:44:20DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
title BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
spellingShingle BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
Nemo, François
Discourse Connectives
Polysemy
Instructional Semantics
title_short BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
title_full BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
title_fullStr BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
title_full_unstemmed BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
title_sort BUT (AND MAIS) AS MORPHEME(S)
author Nemo, François
author_facet Nemo, François
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nemo, François
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discourse Connectives
Polysemy
Instructional Semantics
topic Discourse Connectives
Polysemy
Instructional Semantics
description A morphemic-indicational description of English but (and French mais) is proposed, showing that the uses of but whose closer equivalents (and French translation) are almost, except, only, and without, together with the considerable variety of its connective uses, may be accounted for within a single semantic description. It is shown that but and mais do not encode metacommunicational indications about the relationship between the connected utterances, as is commonly believed and asserted, but provide a rather aspectual information/indication, whose interpretation is contextual and constructional. It is hence shown that but and mais’s description should be split into levels: the description of the indication encoded by the morpheme, which is active in all its uses, and the description of the constructional interpretation the indication receives when the morpheme is inserted in a given construction – such as But for X, Y or P but Q– or used in a specific context. The efficiency of this description is shown to support the Indicational-Indexical Semantics – IIS – framework approach. An introduction to this framework and to its relationship with the instructional semantics mainstream on the one hand, and with the procedural/conceptual distinction on the other hand, is also proposed.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39562
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39562
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39562/26790
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada; v. 18 n. 3 (2002): NÚMERO ESPECIAL
1678-460X
0102-4450
reponame:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
collection DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
repository.name.fl_str_mv DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||delta@pucsp.br
_version_ 1799129302884679680