Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Vanessa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Medeiros, Mariana, Guimarães, Tiago, Bernardino, Rui, Falcão, Gil, Fernandes, Francisco, Farinha, Rui, Calais da Silva, Fernando, Campos Pinheiro, Luís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90
Resumo: Introduction: The non-muscle invasive bladder tumors should be stratified into risk groups so the adjuvant treatment after surgery can be suited to each patient. The high risk tumors should be treated with one to three-year maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). It has been reported shortages of intravesical BCG and our hospital center was affected in 2014/2015, leading to a treatment change of the patients who had indication to BCG. Gemcitabine could be a valid alternative because some studies show it may have a role in intermediate-risk patients, as an alternative to mitomycin C, and in high risk, BCG-refractory patients, with a better toxicity profile. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study that included patients with non-muscle invasive bladder tumors of high risk with onset of disease in 2013/2014, affected by the BCG shortage period at the Hospital Center. Results: At CHLC, 11 high-risk patients were treated with gemcitabine, only two exclusively, and the others sequentially with BCG. Only two patients, treated with both gemcitabine and BCG, had tumoral recurrence. However, a significant number (6 out of 11) had adverse events, two of whom had to stop treatment. Conclusion: Apparently, gemcitabine seems to be a good adjuvant treatment choice during the shortage of the gold standard treatment, due to the low number of recurrence, although adverse events reported were high.
id RCAP_0e7c06dd8ab39d71ffd8ad14ff645648
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) ExperienceA Gencitabina como Alternativa Terapêutica na Ausência de BCG: A Experiência do CHLC (Hospital S. José)BCG VaccineGemcitabine/therapeutic useMitomycin/ therapeutic useTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapyGemcitabina/uso terapêuticoMitomicina/uso terapêuticoNeoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamentoResultado do TratamentoVacina BCGIntroduction: The non-muscle invasive bladder tumors should be stratified into risk groups so the adjuvant treatment after surgery can be suited to each patient. The high risk tumors should be treated with one to three-year maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). It has been reported shortages of intravesical BCG and our hospital center was affected in 2014/2015, leading to a treatment change of the patients who had indication to BCG. Gemcitabine could be a valid alternative because some studies show it may have a role in intermediate-risk patients, as an alternative to mitomycin C, and in high risk, BCG-refractory patients, with a better toxicity profile. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study that included patients with non-muscle invasive bladder tumors of high risk with onset of disease in 2013/2014, affected by the BCG shortage period at the Hospital Center. Results: At CHLC, 11 high-risk patients were treated with gemcitabine, only two exclusively, and the others sequentially with BCG. Only two patients, treated with both gemcitabine and BCG, had tumoral recurrence. However, a significant number (6 out of 11) had adverse events, two of whom had to stop treatment. Conclusion: Apparently, gemcitabine seems to be a good adjuvant treatment choice during the shortage of the gold standard treatment, due to the low number of recurrence, although adverse events reported were high.Introdução: Os tumores não músculo invasivos da bexiga devem ser estratificados em grupos de risco de forma a adequar o tratamento após cirurgia a cada doente. Nos tumores de alto risco deve ser realizada terapêutica adjuvante com bacilo de Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical durante 1 a 3 anos. Têm sido reportadas roturas de stock de BCG intravesical, tendo sido o Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central (CHLC) afectado nos anos 2014 e 2015, o que obrigou a uma reformulação no tratamento dos doentes que tinham indicação para realização desta terapêutica. A gencitabina poderá ser uma alternativa válida, dado que alguns estudos mostram que poderá ter um papel nos doentes de risco intermédio, como alternativa à mitomicina C, e nos de alto risco, refractários à BCG, com um perfil de toxicidade mais favorável. Material e Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo descritivo que incluiu doentes com tumores da bexiga não musculo-invasivos de alto risco, com início da doença em 2013/2014, afectados pelo período de escassez de BCG no Centro Hospitalar. Resultados: No CHLC, 11 doentes com tumores de alto risco foram submetidos a terapêutica com gencitabina, apenas dois exclusivamente, os restantes sequencialmente com BCG. Apenas dois doentes, tratados com BCG e gencitabina, apresentaram recidiva tumoral. No entanto, um número significativo (6 em 11) sofreram efeitos adversos, dois dos quais que levaram à interrupção da terapêutica. Conclusão: Aparentemente, a gencitabina foi uma boa alternativa de terapêutica adjuvante na ausência do tratamento gold standard (BCG), dada a existência de baixo número de recidivais tumorais, apesar do elevado número de efeitos adversos reportados.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2019-09-21T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1-2 (2019): January - June; 11-16Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 36 n. 1-2 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 11-162387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90/49Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, VanessaMedeiros, MarianaGuimarães, TiagoBernardino, RuiFalcão, GilFernandes, FranciscoFarinha, RuiCalais da Silva, FernandoCampos Pinheiro, Luís2022-09-21T09:04:47Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:54.314871Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
A Gencitabina como Alternativa Terapêutica na Ausência de BCG: A Experiência do CHLC (Hospital S. José)
title Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
spellingShingle Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
Andrade, Vanessa
BCG Vaccine
Gemcitabine/therapeutic use
Mitomycin/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
Gemcitabina/uso terapêutico
Mitomicina/uso terapêutico
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento
Resultado do Tratamento
Vacina BCG
title_short Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
title_full Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
title_fullStr Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
title_sort Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
author Andrade, Vanessa
author_facet Andrade, Vanessa
Medeiros, Mariana
Guimarães, Tiago
Bernardino, Rui
Falcão, Gil
Fernandes, Francisco
Farinha, Rui
Calais da Silva, Fernando
Campos Pinheiro, Luís
author_role author
author2 Medeiros, Mariana
Guimarães, Tiago
Bernardino, Rui
Falcão, Gil
Fernandes, Francisco
Farinha, Rui
Calais da Silva, Fernando
Campos Pinheiro, Luís
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Vanessa
Medeiros, Mariana
Guimarães, Tiago
Bernardino, Rui
Falcão, Gil
Fernandes, Francisco
Farinha, Rui
Calais da Silva, Fernando
Campos Pinheiro, Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BCG Vaccine
Gemcitabine/therapeutic use
Mitomycin/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
Gemcitabina/uso terapêutico
Mitomicina/uso terapêutico
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento
Resultado do Tratamento
Vacina BCG
topic BCG Vaccine
Gemcitabine/therapeutic use
Mitomycin/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
Gemcitabina/uso terapêutico
Mitomicina/uso terapêutico
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento
Resultado do Tratamento
Vacina BCG
description Introduction: The non-muscle invasive bladder tumors should be stratified into risk groups so the adjuvant treatment after surgery can be suited to each patient. The high risk tumors should be treated with one to three-year maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). It has been reported shortages of intravesical BCG and our hospital center was affected in 2014/2015, leading to a treatment change of the patients who had indication to BCG. Gemcitabine could be a valid alternative because some studies show it may have a role in intermediate-risk patients, as an alternative to mitomycin C, and in high risk, BCG-refractory patients, with a better toxicity profile. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study that included patients with non-muscle invasive bladder tumors of high risk with onset of disease in 2013/2014, affected by the BCG shortage period at the Hospital Center. Results: At CHLC, 11 high-risk patients were treated with gemcitabine, only two exclusively, and the others sequentially with BCG. Only two patients, treated with both gemcitabine and BCG, had tumoral recurrence. However, a significant number (6 out of 11) had adverse events, two of whom had to stop treatment. Conclusion: Apparently, gemcitabine seems to be a good adjuvant treatment choice during the shortage of the gold standard treatment, due to the low number of recurrence, although adverse events reported were high.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-21T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90
url https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90
identifier_str_mv oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90/49
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urology
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urology
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1-2 (2019): January - June; 11-16
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 36 n. 1-2 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 11-16
2387-0419
2341-4022
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130427721515008