Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740 |
Resumo: | Background and objective: Opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain is associated with problematic use. We aimed to review and summarize the evidence about the prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and sub-analysis was conducted. Results: Our search identified a total of 784 potentially relevant studies. After a thorough evaluation, 19 papers were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, mostly from the USA. The estimated prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain was 36.3% (95% confidence interval: 27.4% - 45.2%; I2 = 99.64%). The method used to identify problematic opioid use was mostly questionnaire. Thirteen studies (68%) presented a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Although significant heterogeneity was present, our study presents an alarming estimate regarding the prevalence of problematic use of opioids among patients with noncancer pain, which deserves special attention from health care professionals and health authorities. |
id |
RCAP_16f7e36f56dec0d41bb7d9b1d4aa3fd2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128740 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysisMedicina clínicaClinical medicineBackground and objective: Opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain is associated with problematic use. We aimed to review and summarize the evidence about the prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and sub-analysis was conducted. Results: Our search identified a total of 784 potentially relevant studies. After a thorough evaluation, 19 papers were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, mostly from the USA. The estimated prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain was 36.3% (95% confidence interval: 27.4% - 45.2%; I2 = 99.64%). The method used to identify problematic opioid use was mostly questionnaire. Thirteen studies (68%) presented a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Although significant heterogeneity was present, our study presents an alarming estimate regarding the prevalence of problematic use of opioids among patients with noncancer pain, which deserves special attention from health care professionals and health authorities.2020-05-122020-05-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740TID:202613054engCatarina de Sousa e Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:59:46Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128740Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:51:54.327219Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
title |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis Catarina de Sousa e Silva Medicina clínica Clinical medicine |
title_short |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
author |
Catarina de Sousa e Silva |
author_facet |
Catarina de Sousa e Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Catarina de Sousa e Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medicina clínica Clinical medicine |
topic |
Medicina clínica Clinical medicine |
description |
Background and objective: Opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain is associated with problematic use. We aimed to review and summarize the evidence about the prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and sub-analysis was conducted. Results: Our search identified a total of 784 potentially relevant studies. After a thorough evaluation, 19 papers were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, mostly from the USA. The estimated prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain was 36.3% (95% confidence interval: 27.4% - 45.2%; I2 = 99.64%). The method used to identify problematic opioid use was mostly questionnaire. Thirteen studies (68%) presented a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Although significant heterogeneity was present, our study presents an alarming estimate regarding the prevalence of problematic use of opioids among patients with noncancer pain, which deserves special attention from health care professionals and health authorities. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-12 2020-05-12T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740 TID:202613054 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202613054 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135839557517312 |