Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Catarina de Sousa e Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740
Resumo: Background and objective: Opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain is associated with problematic use. We aimed to review and summarize the evidence about the prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and sub-analysis was conducted. Results: Our search identified a total of 784 potentially relevant studies. After a thorough evaluation, 19 papers were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, mostly from the USA. The estimated prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain was 36.3% (95% confidence interval: 27.4% - 45.2%; I2 = 99.64%). The method used to identify problematic opioid use was mostly questionnaire. Thirteen studies (68%) presented a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Although significant heterogeneity was present, our study presents an alarming estimate regarding the prevalence of problematic use of opioids among patients with noncancer pain, which deserves special attention from health care professionals and health authorities.
id RCAP_16f7e36f56dec0d41bb7d9b1d4aa3fd2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128740
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysisMedicina clínicaClinical medicineBackground and objective: Opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain is associated with problematic use. We aimed to review and summarize the evidence about the prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and sub-analysis was conducted. Results: Our search identified a total of 784 potentially relevant studies. After a thorough evaluation, 19 papers were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, mostly from the USA. The estimated prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain was 36.3% (95% confidence interval: 27.4% - 45.2%; I2 = 99.64%). The method used to identify problematic opioid use was mostly questionnaire. Thirteen studies (68%) presented a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Although significant heterogeneity was present, our study presents an alarming estimate regarding the prevalence of problematic use of opioids among patients with noncancer pain, which deserves special attention from health care professionals and health authorities.2020-05-122020-05-12T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740TID:202613054engCatarina de Sousa e Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:59:46Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128740Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:51:54.327219Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
spellingShingle Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Catarina de Sousa e Silva
Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
title_short Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort Prevalence of problematic use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
author Catarina de Sousa e Silva
author_facet Catarina de Sousa e Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Catarina de Sousa e Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
topic Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
description Background and objective: Opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain is associated with problematic use. We aimed to review and summarize the evidence about the prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence rates using a random-effects model and sub-analysis was conducted. Results: Our search identified a total of 784 potentially relevant studies. After a thorough evaluation, 19 papers were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, mostly from the USA. The estimated prevalence of problematic use of opioids in adults with chronic noncancer pain was 36.3% (95% confidence interval: 27.4% - 45.2%; I2 = 99.64%). The method used to identify problematic opioid use was mostly questionnaire. Thirteen studies (68%) presented a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Although significant heterogeneity was present, our study presents an alarming estimate regarding the prevalence of problematic use of opioids among patients with noncancer pain, which deserves special attention from health care professionals and health authorities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-12
2020-05-12T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740
TID:202613054
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128740
identifier_str_mv TID:202613054
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135839557517312