Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Ana Lúcia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fragoso,Maria Isabel Caldas Januário, Santos Neto,Francília Maria Carvalho dos, Bento,Cristina Paula Fidalgo Negreiros Monteiro, Teles,Júlia Maria Vitorino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2504-31452020000200071
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: A valid food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is a priority for epidemiological studies. We aimed to perform a relative validity of an FFQ for Portuguese adolescents. Methods: A semi-quantitative Portuguese FFQ (SQ-PortFood-FQ) was developed and the relative validity performed using the multiple-pass 24-h recall. Eighty adolescents (aged 10-17 years) completed both questionnaires to measure energy intake, macroand specific micronutrient intake. We used the following methods for the relative validity: (1) Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r); (2) cross-classification into the same third (agreement) and into the opposite third (disagreement); (3) weighted κ-coefficient (κW); (4) and the Bland-Altman method. Results: We obtained acceptable correlation coefficients between questionnaires for energy (r = 0.59; p < 0.001), protein (r = 0.60; p < 0.001), fat (r = 0.55; p < 0.001), carbohydrates (r = 0.51; p < 0.001) and sodium (r = 0.51; p < 0.001). Tertile agreement for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates and vitamin C intakes classified correctly more than 50% and grossly misclassified less than 10% of participants. Energy and protein produced moderate agreement between methods with a κW >0.40. The SQ-PortFoodFQ overestimated all analysed data when compared to the 24-h recall, although those estimations were <10% for energy, macronutrients and cholesterol. The 95% limits of agreement showed that all the variables (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, calcium, sodium, iron, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol) were within the desirable limits of agreement of 50-200%, with the exception of vitamin C (76-296%) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (75-232%). Discussion/Conclusion: The SQ-PortFood-FQ showed acceptable relative validity at the individual level for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, calcium, sodium, iron, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol. Non-significant relationships were found for vitamin C and PUFA. Our results are in line with previous studies carried out amongst adolescents. As far as we know this is the first FFQ validated for Portuguese adolescents.
id RCAP_25d147c6ba4989713763045864c1227c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2504-31452020000200071
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescentsDietary assessmentRelative validationEnergy intakeNutrient intakeAdolescentsAbstract Introduction: A valid food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is a priority for epidemiological studies. We aimed to perform a relative validity of an FFQ for Portuguese adolescents. Methods: A semi-quantitative Portuguese FFQ (SQ-PortFood-FQ) was developed and the relative validity performed using the multiple-pass 24-h recall. Eighty adolescents (aged 10-17 years) completed both questionnaires to measure energy intake, macroand specific micronutrient intake. We used the following methods for the relative validity: (1) Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r); (2) cross-classification into the same third (agreement) and into the opposite third (disagreement); (3) weighted κ-coefficient (κW); (4) and the Bland-Altman method. Results: We obtained acceptable correlation coefficients between questionnaires for energy (r = 0.59; p < 0.001), protein (r = 0.60; p < 0.001), fat (r = 0.55; p < 0.001), carbohydrates (r = 0.51; p < 0.001) and sodium (r = 0.51; p < 0.001). Tertile agreement for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates and vitamin C intakes classified correctly more than 50% and grossly misclassified less than 10% of participants. Energy and protein produced moderate agreement between methods with a κW >0.40. The SQ-PortFoodFQ overestimated all analysed data when compared to the 24-h recall, although those estimations were <10% for energy, macronutrients and cholesterol. The 95% limits of agreement showed that all the variables (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, calcium, sodium, iron, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol) were within the desirable limits of agreement of 50-200%, with the exception of vitamin C (76-296%) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (75-232%). Discussion/Conclusion: The SQ-PortFood-FQ showed acceptable relative validity at the individual level for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, calcium, sodium, iron, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol. Non-significant relationships were found for vitamin C and PUFA. Our results are in line with previous studies carried out amongst adolescents. As far as we know this is the first FFQ validated for Portuguese adolescents.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2504-31452020000200071Portuguese Journal of Public Health v.38 n.2 2020reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2504-31452020000200071Silva,Ana LúciaFragoso,Maria Isabel Caldas JanuárioSantos Neto,Francília Maria Carvalho dosBento,Cristina Paula Fidalgo Negreiros MonteiroTeles,Júlia Maria Vitorinoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:34:30Zoai:scielo:S2504-31452020000200071Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:36:27.442805Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
title Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
spellingShingle Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
Silva,Ana Lúcia
Dietary assessment
Relative validation
Energy intake
Nutrient intake
Adolescents
title_short Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
title_full Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
title_fullStr Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
title_sort Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adolescents
author Silva,Ana Lúcia
author_facet Silva,Ana Lúcia
Fragoso,Maria Isabel Caldas Januário
Santos Neto,Francília Maria Carvalho dos
Bento,Cristina Paula Fidalgo Negreiros Monteiro
Teles,Júlia Maria Vitorino
author_role author
author2 Fragoso,Maria Isabel Caldas Januário
Santos Neto,Francília Maria Carvalho dos
Bento,Cristina Paula Fidalgo Negreiros Monteiro
Teles,Júlia Maria Vitorino
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Ana Lúcia
Fragoso,Maria Isabel Caldas Januário
Santos Neto,Francília Maria Carvalho dos
Bento,Cristina Paula Fidalgo Negreiros Monteiro
Teles,Júlia Maria Vitorino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dietary assessment
Relative validation
Energy intake
Nutrient intake
Adolescents
topic Dietary assessment
Relative validation
Energy intake
Nutrient intake
Adolescents
description Abstract Introduction: A valid food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is a priority for epidemiological studies. We aimed to perform a relative validity of an FFQ for Portuguese adolescents. Methods: A semi-quantitative Portuguese FFQ (SQ-PortFood-FQ) was developed and the relative validity performed using the multiple-pass 24-h recall. Eighty adolescents (aged 10-17 years) completed both questionnaires to measure energy intake, macroand specific micronutrient intake. We used the following methods for the relative validity: (1) Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r); (2) cross-classification into the same third (agreement) and into the opposite third (disagreement); (3) weighted κ-coefficient (κW); (4) and the Bland-Altman method. Results: We obtained acceptable correlation coefficients between questionnaires for energy (r = 0.59; p < 0.001), protein (r = 0.60; p < 0.001), fat (r = 0.55; p < 0.001), carbohydrates (r = 0.51; p < 0.001) and sodium (r = 0.51; p < 0.001). Tertile agreement for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates and vitamin C intakes classified correctly more than 50% and grossly misclassified less than 10% of participants. Energy and protein produced moderate agreement between methods with a κW >0.40. The SQ-PortFoodFQ overestimated all analysed data when compared to the 24-h recall, although those estimations were <10% for energy, macronutrients and cholesterol. The 95% limits of agreement showed that all the variables (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, calcium, sodium, iron, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol) were within the desirable limits of agreement of 50-200%, with the exception of vitamin C (76-296%) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (75-232%). Discussion/Conclusion: The SQ-PortFood-FQ showed acceptable relative validity at the individual level for energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, calcium, sodium, iron, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol. Non-significant relationships were found for vitamin C and PUFA. Our results are in line with previous studies carried out amongst adolescents. As far as we know this is the first FFQ validated for Portuguese adolescents.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2504-31452020000200071
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2504-31452020000200071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2504-31452020000200071
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Public Health v.38 n.2 2020
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137416083144704