Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dinis, J
Data de Publicação: 2000
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764
Resumo: To find out the opinion of family doctors concerning the statutory notification of communicable diseases (SNCD) and to analyse factors associated to a good attitude towards SNCD.Guimarães Health Centre, Guimarães.Analytical cross-sectional study. Questionnaire survey. The 52 family doctors of the Health Centre were asked to express their opinion on some issues, including the utility of SNCD, reasons for the under-reporting of communicable diseases, up-to-dateness of the list of notifiable conditions, facility of filling in the notification form, and their own attitude towards notification. The variables utility of SNCD and attitude towards notification were then considered together with other variables (including postgraduate time, length of the family doctor's lists of patients, working in exclusivity, and how the degree of general practitioner is obtained).The SNCD was considered at least somewhat useful by 96% of the doctors. Thirty percent of the doctors considered excess work and/or lack of time as the main reason for under-reporting, and 29% it attributed to lack of sufficient motivation. The list of notifiable conditions was considered out dated by 46% of the doctors. Thirty eight percent of them considered the multiple notification of a case of disease not inconvenient and 54% stated that they had used it to notify all or almost all of cases they knew. The doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients seemed to have a greater compliance regarding notification (p < 0.05).The majority of doctors considered the notification useful. They attributed the under-reporting to some conditions that are difficult to change. In this population, the doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients showed a more favourable attitude towards reporting notifiable conditions.
id RCAP_3bdaef9df4f85785d4770681f25ffac8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1764
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.Declaração obrigatória de doenças transmissíveis: o que pensam os médicos.To find out the opinion of family doctors concerning the statutory notification of communicable diseases (SNCD) and to analyse factors associated to a good attitude towards SNCD.Guimarães Health Centre, Guimarães.Analytical cross-sectional study. Questionnaire survey. The 52 family doctors of the Health Centre were asked to express their opinion on some issues, including the utility of SNCD, reasons for the under-reporting of communicable diseases, up-to-dateness of the list of notifiable conditions, facility of filling in the notification form, and their own attitude towards notification. The variables utility of SNCD and attitude towards notification were then considered together with other variables (including postgraduate time, length of the family doctor's lists of patients, working in exclusivity, and how the degree of general practitioner is obtained).The SNCD was considered at least somewhat useful by 96% of the doctors. Thirty percent of the doctors considered excess work and/or lack of time as the main reason for under-reporting, and 29% it attributed to lack of sufficient motivation. The list of notifiable conditions was considered out dated by 46% of the doctors. Thirty eight percent of them considered the multiple notification of a case of disease not inconvenient and 54% stated that they had used it to notify all or almost all of cases they knew. The doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients seemed to have a greater compliance regarding notification (p < 0.05).The majority of doctors considered the notification useful. They attributed the under-reporting to some conditions that are difficult to change. In this population, the doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients showed a more favourable attitude towards reporting notifiable conditions.To find out the opinion of family doctors concerning the statutory notification of communicable diseases (SNCD) and to analyse factors associated to a good attitude towards SNCD.Guimarães Health Centre, Guimarães.Analytical cross-sectional study. Questionnaire survey. The 52 family doctors of the Health Centre were asked to express their opinion on some issues, including the utility of SNCD, reasons for the under-reporting of communicable diseases, up-to-dateness of the list of notifiable conditions, facility of filling in the notification form, and their own attitude towards notification. The variables utility of SNCD and attitude towards notification were then considered together with other variables (including postgraduate time, length of the family doctor's lists of patients, working in exclusivity, and how the degree of general practitioner is obtained).The SNCD was considered at least somewhat useful by 96% of the doctors. Thirty percent of the doctors considered excess work and/or lack of time as the main reason for under-reporting, and 29% it attributed to lack of sufficient motivation. The list of notifiable conditions was considered out dated by 46% of the doctors. Thirty eight percent of them considered the multiple notification of a case of disease not inconvenient and 54% stated that they had used it to notify all or almost all of cases they knew. The doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients seemed to have a greater compliance regarding notification (p < 0.05).The majority of doctors considered the notification useful. They attributed the under-reporting to some conditions that are difficult to change. In this population, the doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients showed a more favourable attitude towards reporting notifiable conditions.Ordem dos Médicos2000-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1764Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 13 No. 1-2 (2000): Janeiro-Abril; 33-8Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 13 N.º 1-2 (2000): Janeiro-Abril; 33-81646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764/1341Dinis, Jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:58:57Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1764Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:17:22.641442Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
Declaração obrigatória de doenças transmissíveis: o que pensam os médicos.
title Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
spellingShingle Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
Dinis, J
title_short Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
title_full Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
title_fullStr Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
title_full_unstemmed Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
title_sort Mandatory notification of communicable diseases: what physicians think.
author Dinis, J
author_facet Dinis, J
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dinis, J
description To find out the opinion of family doctors concerning the statutory notification of communicable diseases (SNCD) and to analyse factors associated to a good attitude towards SNCD.Guimarães Health Centre, Guimarães.Analytical cross-sectional study. Questionnaire survey. The 52 family doctors of the Health Centre were asked to express their opinion on some issues, including the utility of SNCD, reasons for the under-reporting of communicable diseases, up-to-dateness of the list of notifiable conditions, facility of filling in the notification form, and their own attitude towards notification. The variables utility of SNCD and attitude towards notification were then considered together with other variables (including postgraduate time, length of the family doctor's lists of patients, working in exclusivity, and how the degree of general practitioner is obtained).The SNCD was considered at least somewhat useful by 96% of the doctors. Thirty percent of the doctors considered excess work and/or lack of time as the main reason for under-reporting, and 29% it attributed to lack of sufficient motivation. The list of notifiable conditions was considered out dated by 46% of the doctors. Thirty eight percent of them considered the multiple notification of a case of disease not inconvenient and 54% stated that they had used it to notify all or almost all of cases they knew. The doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients seemed to have a greater compliance regarding notification (p < 0.05).The majority of doctors considered the notification useful. They attributed the under-reporting to some conditions that are difficult to change. In this population, the doctors who worked exclusively as civil servants and who had smaller lists of patients showed a more favourable attitude towards reporting notifiable conditions.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-04-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1764
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/1764
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/1764/1341
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 13 No. 1-2 (2000): Janeiro-Abril; 33-8
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 13 N.º 1-2 (2000): Janeiro-Abril; 33-8
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130627040083968