Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Afonso, Andreia M.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Antunes, Maria Dulce, Cruz, Sandra, Cavaco, A. M., Guerra, Rui Manuel Farinha das Neves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18468
Resumo: Visible/near infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIRS) was used to monitor the yellow-fleshed kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch 'Jintao') ripening on two selected orchards along 13 weeks, from pre-harvest to the late harvest. Calibration models for several Internal Quality Attibutes (IQA) were built from the spectral data of 375 individual kiwifruit. The analyzed IQA were L*, a* and b* from the CIELAB color space, hue angle, chroma, firmness, dry matter (DM), soluble solids content (SSC), juice pH and titratable acidity (TA). Different pre-processing methods were tested for the construction of PLS calibration models. SSC and Hue were the best performing models with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 and 0.88, and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.27% and 1.95 degrees, respectively. The interpretation of the models in terms of the known absorption bands and the impact of signal to noise ratio (SNR) in them is discussed. The calibration models were used to perform average predictions of the IQA on orchard subareas, for each day of the experiment. These average predictions were compared with the IQA's average reference values on the same subareas and days. The model's metrics improved significantly through the averaging procedure, with RMSEP = 0.26-0.36% and R-2 = 0.99 for SSC; and RMSEP = 0.42 degrees - 0.56 degrees and R-2 = 1 for Hue. Since orchard management is done essentially through averages and not individual values, this result reinforces the applicability of the NIR technology for follow-up of fruit ripening in the tree.
id RCAP_4677e1f34b66ca5237708f3772d7f75e
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/18468
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictionsNoninvasiveInternal qualityOptimal harvest dateSignal-to-noise ratioFlesh colorSoluble solids contentVisible/near infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIRS) was used to monitor the yellow-fleshed kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch 'Jintao') ripening on two selected orchards along 13 weeks, from pre-harvest to the late harvest. Calibration models for several Internal Quality Attibutes (IQA) were built from the spectral data of 375 individual kiwifruit. The analyzed IQA were L*, a* and b* from the CIELAB color space, hue angle, chroma, firmness, dry matter (DM), soluble solids content (SSC), juice pH and titratable acidity (TA). Different pre-processing methods were tested for the construction of PLS calibration models. SSC and Hue were the best performing models with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 and 0.88, and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.27% and 1.95 degrees, respectively. The interpretation of the models in terms of the known absorption bands and the impact of signal to noise ratio (SNR) in them is discussed. The calibration models were used to perform average predictions of the IQA on orchard subareas, for each day of the experiment. These average predictions were compared with the IQA's average reference values on the same subareas and days. The model's metrics improved significantly through the averaging procedure, with RMSEP = 0.26-0.36% and R-2 = 0.99 for SSC; and RMSEP = 0.42 degrees - 0.56 degrees and R-2 = 1 for Hue. Since orchard management is done essentially through averages and not individual values, this result reinforces the applicability of the NIR technology for follow-up of fruit ripening in the tree.ElsevierSapientiaAfonso, Andreia M.Antunes, Maria DulceCruz, SandraCavaco, A. M.Guerra, Rui Manuel Farinha das Neves2022-11-02T14:26:41Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18468eng0925-521410.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111895info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:30:43Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/18468Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:08:13.937002Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
title Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
spellingShingle Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
Afonso, Andreia M.
Noninvasive
Internal quality
Optimal harvest date
Signal-to-noise ratio
Flesh color
Soluble solids content
title_short Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
title_full Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
title_fullStr Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
title_full_unstemmed Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
title_sort Non-destructive follow-up of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit ripening through VIS-NIR spectroscopy – individual vs. average calibration model’s predictions
author Afonso, Andreia M.
author_facet Afonso, Andreia M.
Antunes, Maria Dulce
Cruz, Sandra
Cavaco, A. M.
Guerra, Rui Manuel Farinha das Neves
author_role author
author2 Antunes, Maria Dulce
Cruz, Sandra
Cavaco, A. M.
Guerra, Rui Manuel Farinha das Neves
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Afonso, Andreia M.
Antunes, Maria Dulce
Cruz, Sandra
Cavaco, A. M.
Guerra, Rui Manuel Farinha das Neves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Noninvasive
Internal quality
Optimal harvest date
Signal-to-noise ratio
Flesh color
Soluble solids content
topic Noninvasive
Internal quality
Optimal harvest date
Signal-to-noise ratio
Flesh color
Soluble solids content
description Visible/near infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIRS) was used to monitor the yellow-fleshed kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch 'Jintao') ripening on two selected orchards along 13 weeks, from pre-harvest to the late harvest. Calibration models for several Internal Quality Attibutes (IQA) were built from the spectral data of 375 individual kiwifruit. The analyzed IQA were L*, a* and b* from the CIELAB color space, hue angle, chroma, firmness, dry matter (DM), soluble solids content (SSC), juice pH and titratable acidity (TA). Different pre-processing methods were tested for the construction of PLS calibration models. SSC and Hue were the best performing models with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 and 0.88, and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.27% and 1.95 degrees, respectively. The interpretation of the models in terms of the known absorption bands and the impact of signal to noise ratio (SNR) in them is discussed. The calibration models were used to perform average predictions of the IQA on orchard subareas, for each day of the experiment. These average predictions were compared with the IQA's average reference values on the same subareas and days. The model's metrics improved significantly through the averaging procedure, with RMSEP = 0.26-0.36% and R-2 = 0.99 for SSC; and RMSEP = 0.42 degrees - 0.56 degrees and R-2 = 1 for Hue. Since orchard management is done essentially through averages and not individual values, this result reinforces the applicability of the NIR technology for follow-up of fruit ripening in the tree.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-02T14:26:41Z
2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18468
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/18468
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0925-5214
10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111895
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133328316563456