Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sarmento, Hugo, Buzzichelli, Carlo, Alfano Moura, Nelio, Gonzáles Badillo, Juan José, Santos, Amândio, Rama, Luís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106791
Resumo: This systematic review provides critical and propositional information on criteria for determining the volume and intensity of drop jumps during plyometric training programs. Eligibility criteria were defined according to PICOS: Participants: male or female athletes, trained or recreationally active (16–40 years). Intervention duration: more than 4 weeks. Comparators: passive or active control group during a plyometric training program. Outcomes: information on improvement with Drop Jump or Depth Jump, with other jumps, acceleration, sprint, strength, and power output. Design: randomized controlled trials. We searched articles published in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search was conducted until 10 September 2022 for English-language articles only. The risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for randomized controlled studies. We identified 31495 studies, of which only 22 were included. We found that six groups presented results with women, 15 presented results with men, and the remaining four presented mixed studies. Of the 686 people recruited, 329 participants aged 25.79 ± 4.76 years were involved in training. Methodological problems in training intensity, volume distribution, and individualization were noted, but methodological recommendations for their solution are also provided. It is concluded that the drop height should not be understood as the intensity determinant of plyometric training. Intensity is determined by ground reaction forces, power output, and jump height, among other factors. Furthermore, the athletes’ experience level selection should be based on the formulas recommended within this research. These results could be helpful for those who intend to conduct new plyometric training programs and research.
id RCAP_4f4ecaf9bcab6f772fde9353984e280e
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106791
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive reviewdrop jumpdepth jumpjumping programplyometric trainingplyometricsThis systematic review provides critical and propositional information on criteria for determining the volume and intensity of drop jumps during plyometric training programs. Eligibility criteria were defined according to PICOS: Participants: male or female athletes, trained or recreationally active (16–40 years). Intervention duration: more than 4 weeks. Comparators: passive or active control group during a plyometric training program. Outcomes: information on improvement with Drop Jump or Depth Jump, with other jumps, acceleration, sprint, strength, and power output. Design: randomized controlled trials. We searched articles published in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search was conducted until 10 September 2022 for English-language articles only. The risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for randomized controlled studies. We identified 31495 studies, of which only 22 were included. We found that six groups presented results with women, 15 presented results with men, and the remaining four presented mixed studies. Of the 686 people recruited, 329 participants aged 25.79 ± 4.76 years were involved in training. Methodological problems in training intensity, volume distribution, and individualization were noted, but methodological recommendations for their solution are also provided. It is concluded that the drop height should not be understood as the intensity determinant of plyometric training. Intensity is determined by ground reaction forces, power output, and jump height, among other factors. Furthermore, the athletes’ experience level selection should be based on the formulas recommended within this research. These results could be helpful for those who intend to conduct new plyometric training programs and research.1218-2F4F-CC9E | Raynier Montoro-BombúN/AFrontiers2023-04-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/106791http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106791engcv-prod-3241024Montoro-Bombú, RaynierSarmento, HugoBuzzichelli, CarloAlfano Moura, NelioGonzáles Badillo, Juan JoséSantos, AmândioRama, Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-04-24T11:36:23Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106791Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:23:11.564131Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
title Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
spellingShingle Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
drop jump
depth jump
jumping program
plyometric training
plyometrics
title_short Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
title_full Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
title_fullStr Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
title_sort Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review
author Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
author_facet Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
Sarmento, Hugo
Buzzichelli, Carlo
Alfano Moura, Nelio
Gonzáles Badillo, Juan José
Santos, Amândio
Rama, Luís
author_role author
author2 Sarmento, Hugo
Buzzichelli, Carlo
Alfano Moura, Nelio
Gonzáles Badillo, Juan José
Santos, Amândio
Rama, Luís
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
Sarmento, Hugo
Buzzichelli, Carlo
Alfano Moura, Nelio
Gonzáles Badillo, Juan José
Santos, Amândio
Rama, Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv drop jump
depth jump
jumping program
plyometric training
plyometrics
topic drop jump
depth jump
jumping program
plyometric training
plyometrics
description This systematic review provides critical and propositional information on criteria for determining the volume and intensity of drop jumps during plyometric training programs. Eligibility criteria were defined according to PICOS: Participants: male or female athletes, trained or recreationally active (16–40 years). Intervention duration: more than 4 weeks. Comparators: passive or active control group during a plyometric training program. Outcomes: information on improvement with Drop Jump or Depth Jump, with other jumps, acceleration, sprint, strength, and power output. Design: randomized controlled trials. We searched articles published in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search was conducted until 10 September 2022 for English-language articles only. The risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for randomized controlled studies. We identified 31495 studies, of which only 22 were included. We found that six groups presented results with women, 15 presented results with men, and the remaining four presented mixed studies. Of the 686 people recruited, 329 participants aged 25.79 ± 4.76 years were involved in training. Methodological problems in training intensity, volume distribution, and individualization were noted, but methodological recommendations for their solution are also provided. It is concluded that the drop height should not be understood as the intensity determinant of plyometric training. Intensity is determined by ground reaction forces, power output, and jump height, among other factors. Furthermore, the athletes’ experience level selection should be based on the formulas recommended within this research. These results could be helpful for those who intend to conduct new plyometric training programs and research.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106791
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106791
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106791
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv cv-prod-3241024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134119523778560