Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Pedro L.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Luzeiro, Isabel, Lopes, Margarida, Jorge, André, Silva, Bruno, Ferreira, Lara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200
Resumo: Background Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient’s sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.
id RCAP_51763b57702fad0c2aa3ab9eedce5e4d
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/15200
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability AssessmentPatient reported outcomesQuality of lifeMigrainemMIDAS-PProductivityDisabilityBackground Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient’s sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.This project was funded by a research grant from Novartis Farma. The authors were not in any way influenced by this funding. This was only used for logistic purposes. CEISUC/CIBB is funded by national funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the Multiannual Financing of R&D Units 2020–2023.BioMed CentralSapientiaFerreira, Pedro L.Luzeiro, IsabelLopes, MargaridaJorge, AndréSilva, BrunoFerreira, Lara2021-03-08T23:32:22Z2021-02-062021-03-01T04:19:06Z2021-02-06T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200engBMC Neurology. 2021 Feb 06;21(1):581471-237710.1186/s12883-021-02085-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:27:33Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/15200Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:06:03.094023Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
title Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
spellingShingle Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
Ferreira, Pedro L.
Patient reported outcomes
Quality of life
Migraine
mMIDAS-P
Productivity
Disability
title_short Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
title_full Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
title_sort Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
author Ferreira, Pedro L.
author_facet Ferreira, Pedro L.
Luzeiro, Isabel
Lopes, Margarida
Jorge, André
Silva, Bruno
Ferreira, Lara
author_role author
author2 Luzeiro, Isabel
Lopes, Margarida
Jorge, André
Silva, Bruno
Ferreira, Lara
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Pedro L.
Luzeiro, Isabel
Lopes, Margarida
Jorge, André
Silva, Bruno
Ferreira, Lara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patient reported outcomes
Quality of life
Migraine
mMIDAS-P
Productivity
Disability
topic Patient reported outcomes
Quality of life
Migraine
mMIDAS-P
Productivity
Disability
description Background Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient’s sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-08T23:32:22Z
2021-02-06
2021-03-01T04:19:06Z
2021-02-06T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMC Neurology. 2021 Feb 06;21(1):58
1471-2377
10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133300813463552