Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200 |
Resumo: | Background Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient’s sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use. |
id |
RCAP_51763b57702fad0c2aa3ab9eedce5e4d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/15200 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability AssessmentPatient reported outcomesQuality of lifeMigrainemMIDAS-PProductivityDisabilityBackground Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient’s sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.This project was funded by a research grant from Novartis Farma. The authors were not in any way influenced by this funding. This was only used for logistic purposes. CEISUC/CIBB is funded by national funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the Multiannual Financing of R&D Units 2020–2023.BioMed CentralSapientiaFerreira, Pedro L.Luzeiro, IsabelLopes, MargaridaJorge, AndréSilva, BrunoFerreira, Lara2021-03-08T23:32:22Z2021-02-062021-03-01T04:19:06Z2021-02-06T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200engBMC Neurology. 2021 Feb 06;21(1):581471-237710.1186/s12883-021-02085-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:27:33Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/15200Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:06:03.094023Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
title |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
spellingShingle |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment Ferreira, Pedro L. Patient reported outcomes Quality of life Migraine mMIDAS-P Productivity Disability |
title_short |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
title_full |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
title_fullStr |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
title_sort |
Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment |
author |
Ferreira, Pedro L. |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Pedro L. Luzeiro, Isabel Lopes, Margarida Jorge, André Silva, Bruno Ferreira, Lara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luzeiro, Isabel Lopes, Margarida Jorge, André Silva, Bruno Ferreira, Lara |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sapientia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Pedro L. Luzeiro, Isabel Lopes, Margarida Jorge, André Silva, Bruno Ferreira, Lara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Patient reported outcomes Quality of life Migraine mMIDAS-P Productivity Disability |
topic |
Patient reported outcomes Quality of life Migraine mMIDAS-P Productivity Disability |
description |
Background Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient’s sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-08T23:32:22Z 2021-02-06 2021-03-01T04:19:06Z 2021-02-06T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/15200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
BMC Neurology. 2021 Feb 06;21(1):58 1471-2377 10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133300813463552 |