The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2019000200003 |
Resumo: | In the past, interim relief prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal had taken the form of multiple legal mechanisms. For one reason or another, all of them would eventually fail. In 2006, however, the paradigm would change definitively with the creation of the Emergency Arbitrator. Currently, all the main international arbitration institutions, with rare exceptions, offer their users the possibility of obtaining such interim relief. The normative architecture of this new mechanism - idealised and structured for disputes between private entities - ended up being applied to disputes involving states, state entities, and state enterprises. Given the characteristics of both these actors and the disputes in which they participate, the question arises as to whether this system, as it exists, can be applied to them without any need for adaptation. Therefore, we propose a careful analysis of the international arbitral case law on the matter, which, although scarce, is finally beginning to provide relevant insights. |
id |
RCAP_5e30dc2d2805153f0b3c10b56f6b1501 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2183-184X2019000200003 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment DisputesInternational arbitrationEmergency arbitratorStatesState entitiesState enterprisesIn the past, interim relief prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal had taken the form of multiple legal mechanisms. For one reason or another, all of them would eventually fail. In 2006, however, the paradigm would change definitively with the creation of the Emergency Arbitrator. Currently, all the main international arbitration institutions, with rare exceptions, offer their users the possibility of obtaining such interim relief. The normative architecture of this new mechanism - idealised and structured for disputes between private entities - ended up being applied to disputes involving states, state entities, and state enterprises. Given the characteristics of both these actors and the disputes in which they participate, the question arises as to whether this system, as it exists, can be applied to them without any need for adaptation. Therefore, we propose a careful analysis of the international arbitral case law on the matter, which, although scarce, is finally beginning to provide relevant insights.Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2019000200003e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.6 n.2 2019reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2019000200003Gouveia,Mariana FrançaAntunes,João Gilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:29:49Zoai:scielo:S2183-184X2019000200003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:33:36.550965Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
title |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
spellingShingle |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes Gouveia,Mariana França International arbitration Emergency arbitrator States State entities State enterprises |
title_short |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
title_full |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
title_fullStr |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
title_sort |
The Suitability of the Emergency Arbitrator for Investment Disputes |
author |
Gouveia,Mariana França |
author_facet |
Gouveia,Mariana França Antunes,João Gil |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Antunes,João Gil |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gouveia,Mariana França Antunes,João Gil |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
International arbitration Emergency arbitrator States State entities State enterprises |
topic |
International arbitration Emergency arbitrator States State entities State enterprises |
description |
In the past, interim relief prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal had taken the form of multiple legal mechanisms. For one reason or another, all of them would eventually fail. In 2006, however, the paradigm would change definitively with the creation of the Emergency Arbitrator. Currently, all the main international arbitration institutions, with rare exceptions, offer their users the possibility of obtaining such interim relief. The normative architecture of this new mechanism - idealised and structured for disputes between private entities - ended up being applied to disputes involving states, state entities, and state enterprises. Given the characteristics of both these actors and the disputes in which they participate, the question arises as to whether this system, as it exists, can be applied to them without any need for adaptation. Therefore, we propose a careful analysis of the international arbitral case law on the matter, which, although scarce, is finally beginning to provide relevant insights. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2019000200003 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2019000200003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2019000200003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.6 n.2 2019 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137394591531008 |