Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nowottny, Andreas
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/70415
Resumo: What do portfolios offered by robo advisors look like in practice? And how would these portfolios have performed over the past 17.5 years, considering the dot-com bubble as well as the 2008/2009 global financial crisis? Current robo advisory portfolios from mainly German fintechs are analysed and backtested, utilizing an ETF-replication approach in which current ETF fees are deducted from historical, total return indices to mimic the performance of these financial products over the analysed time period. The performance statistics and factor loadings are then analysed and compared. The obtained results show that asset allocations in general do not differ greatly for similar risk-attitudes. However, the influence of fees as well as stronger loadings on the factors of size and value can have a substantial impact on the overall portfolio performance after controlling for different risk levels. Concluding, the analysed robo advisors do not outperform a simple, self-managed ETF portfolio, but do add value in terms of possible factor exposure, the quantification of risk-attitudes as well as the full automation of the asset allocation and investment process. Overall, this is a practical work with a strong focus on the implemented backtest, hence consulting the attached Excel model is strongly advised.
id RCAP_62ed539e0b8d1f063b91458ec0a0a288
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/70415
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative studyRobo advisorPortfolio managementMarketsPerformanceBacktestDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoWhat do portfolios offered by robo advisors look like in practice? And how would these portfolios have performed over the past 17.5 years, considering the dot-com bubble as well as the 2008/2009 global financial crisis? Current robo advisory portfolios from mainly German fintechs are analysed and backtested, utilizing an ETF-replication approach in which current ETF fees are deducted from historical, total return indices to mimic the performance of these financial products over the analysed time period. The performance statistics and factor loadings are then analysed and compared. The obtained results show that asset allocations in general do not differ greatly for similar risk-attitudes. However, the influence of fees as well as stronger loadings on the factors of size and value can have a substantial impact on the overall portfolio performance after controlling for different risk levels. Concluding, the analysed robo advisors do not outperform a simple, self-managed ETF portfolio, but do add value in terms of possible factor exposure, the quantification of risk-attitudes as well as the full automation of the asset allocation and investment process. Overall, this is a practical work with a strong focus on the implemented backtest, hence consulting the attached Excel model is strongly advised.Prado, MelissaRUNNowottny, Andreas2019-05-22T14:41:08Z2019-01-252019-01-25T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/70415TID:202226581enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:33:22Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/70415Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:35:05.845403Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
title Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
spellingShingle Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
Nowottny, Andreas
Robo advisor
Portfolio management
Markets
Performance
Backtest
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
title_full Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
title_fullStr Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
title_sort Historical performance of robot advisors – an historical backtest and comparative study
author Nowottny, Andreas
author_facet Nowottny, Andreas
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Prado, Melissa
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nowottny, Andreas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Robo advisor
Portfolio management
Markets
Performance
Backtest
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Robo advisor
Portfolio management
Markets
Performance
Backtest
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description What do portfolios offered by robo advisors look like in practice? And how would these portfolios have performed over the past 17.5 years, considering the dot-com bubble as well as the 2008/2009 global financial crisis? Current robo advisory portfolios from mainly German fintechs are analysed and backtested, utilizing an ETF-replication approach in which current ETF fees are deducted from historical, total return indices to mimic the performance of these financial products over the analysed time period. The performance statistics and factor loadings are then analysed and compared. The obtained results show that asset allocations in general do not differ greatly for similar risk-attitudes. However, the influence of fees as well as stronger loadings on the factors of size and value can have a substantial impact on the overall portfolio performance after controlling for different risk levels. Concluding, the analysed robo advisors do not outperform a simple, self-managed ETF portfolio, but do add value in terms of possible factor exposure, the quantification of risk-attitudes as well as the full automation of the asset allocation and investment process. Overall, this is a practical work with a strong focus on the implemented backtest, hence consulting the attached Excel model is strongly advised.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-22T14:41:08Z
2019-01-25
2019-01-25T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/70415
TID:202226581
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/70415
identifier_str_mv TID:202226581
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137972503707648