Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Maria Francisca da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/39437
Resumo: Despite the academic and legal progressive efforts to encourage corporate whistleblowing, a set of thorough and practical guidelines on creating and maintaining an efficient internal whistleblowing system is yet lacking, namely regarding the design and content of the whistleblowing policies (Gao & Brink, 2017). Corporate whistleblowing systems are central to an ethical organization's culture (M. S. Schwartz, 2013) and sustainability (S&P Global, 2022). Based upon Hassink et al. (2007) research, this study performed a content analysis on public whistleblowing information from ten large corporations for the purpose to answer the question “How are sustainable-world-leading corporations, in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods industry, managing whistleblowing?” The findings reveal that the disclosed whistleblowing information is scattered and heterogeneity in the implementation of whistleblowing systems, with discrepancies in both the level and content of the disclosure. Notwithstanding, some topics were disclosed with greater evenness namely the guarantee of confidentiality, the possibility of anonymous reporting, the protection of the whistleblower against retaliation and the pledge of a serious investigation. Overall, there is room for improvement in the design of whistleblowing policies, both in terms of fostering communication and transparency as well as the level of formality involved. This research answers Gao & Brink (2017) call for research into the differences and trends in corporate whistleblowing structures, besides having practical relevance for corporations that still lack whistleblowing policies or to those that intend to benchmark and strengthen their own.
id RCAP_64dc128cac40d1858fff65cc32a5b8e2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/39437
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policiesWhistleblowingWhistleblowing policiesContent analysisEthicsDenúnciasPolítica de denúnciasAnálise de conteúdoÉticaDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoDespite the academic and legal progressive efforts to encourage corporate whistleblowing, a set of thorough and practical guidelines on creating and maintaining an efficient internal whistleblowing system is yet lacking, namely regarding the design and content of the whistleblowing policies (Gao & Brink, 2017). Corporate whistleblowing systems are central to an ethical organization's culture (M. S. Schwartz, 2013) and sustainability (S&P Global, 2022). Based upon Hassink et al. (2007) research, this study performed a content analysis on public whistleblowing information from ten large corporations for the purpose to answer the question “How are sustainable-world-leading corporations, in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods industry, managing whistleblowing?” The findings reveal that the disclosed whistleblowing information is scattered and heterogeneity in the implementation of whistleblowing systems, with discrepancies in both the level and content of the disclosure. Notwithstanding, some topics were disclosed with greater evenness namely the guarantee of confidentiality, the possibility of anonymous reporting, the protection of the whistleblower against retaliation and the pledge of a serious investigation. Overall, there is room for improvement in the design of whistleblowing policies, both in terms of fostering communication and transparency as well as the level of formality involved. This research answers Gao & Brink (2017) call for research into the differences and trends in corporate whistleblowing structures, besides having practical relevance for corporations that still lack whistleblowing policies or to those that intend to benchmark and strengthen their own.Apesar dos crescentes esforços académicos e legislativos que procuram fomentar a denúncia corporativa Ȯ whistleblowing Ȯ poucos são os estudos sobre como implementar e manter um sistema de denúncia interno eficiente, especificamente através do design e conteúdo das políticas de whistleblowing, elemento esse fundamental para uma cultura organizacional ética (M. S. Schwartz, 2013) e sustentável (S&P Global, 2022).Tendo por base o estudo de Hassink et al.,(2007), foi realizado uma análise de conteúdo das informações publicadas referentes ao whistleblowing de dez grandes corporações com o intuito de responder à questão “Como é que as corporações líderes mundiais em sustentabilidade, no setor de Bens de Consumo de Movimento Rápido, estão a gerir a denúncia corporativa?”. Os resultados revelam que a informação divulgada se encontra dispersa, havendo uma heterogeneidade na implementação de sistemas de whistleblowing, com discrepâncias tanto no nível de reporte quanto no conteúdo da divulgação. Não obstante, os tópicos de maior consenso foram relativos à confidencialidade da denúncia, a possibilidade de anonimato, a proteção do denunciante contra a retaliação e o compromisso de uma investigação séria. Sucintamente, há espaço para melhorias no design das políticas de whistleblowing, sendo pertinente fomentar a comunicação e níveis de divulgação assim como o respetivo grau de formalidade. Este estudo responde ao apelo de Gao&Brink (2017) de estudos sobre as diferenças e tendências nos mecanismos de denúncias corporativas tendo também relevância de cariz prático, nomeadamente para empresas que carecem de políticas de denúncia e para aquelas que as pretendem comparar e fortalecerGonçalves, Helena Maria da Silva Maia de CastroVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaFernandes, Maria Francisca da Costa2022-11-30T09:57:25Z2022-10-132022-092022-10-13T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/39437TID:203088581enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:44:55Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/39437Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:32:16.839086Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
title Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
spellingShingle Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
Fernandes, Maria Francisca da Costa
Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing policies
Content analysis
Ethics
Denúncias
Política de denúncias
Análise de conteúdo
Ética
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
title_full Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
title_fullStr Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
title_full_unstemmed Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
title_sort Whistleblowing disclosure in leading sustainability corporations : a content analysis of whistleblowing policies
author Fernandes, Maria Francisca da Costa
author_facet Fernandes, Maria Francisca da Costa
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Helena Maria da Silva Maia de Castro
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Maria Francisca da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing policies
Content analysis
Ethics
Denúncias
Política de denúncias
Análise de conteúdo
Ética
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing policies
Content analysis
Ethics
Denúncias
Política de denúncias
Análise de conteúdo
Ética
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description Despite the academic and legal progressive efforts to encourage corporate whistleblowing, a set of thorough and practical guidelines on creating and maintaining an efficient internal whistleblowing system is yet lacking, namely regarding the design and content of the whistleblowing policies (Gao & Brink, 2017). Corporate whistleblowing systems are central to an ethical organization's culture (M. S. Schwartz, 2013) and sustainability (S&P Global, 2022). Based upon Hassink et al. (2007) research, this study performed a content analysis on public whistleblowing information from ten large corporations for the purpose to answer the question “How are sustainable-world-leading corporations, in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods industry, managing whistleblowing?” The findings reveal that the disclosed whistleblowing information is scattered and heterogeneity in the implementation of whistleblowing systems, with discrepancies in both the level and content of the disclosure. Notwithstanding, some topics were disclosed with greater evenness namely the guarantee of confidentiality, the possibility of anonymous reporting, the protection of the whistleblower against retaliation and the pledge of a serious investigation. Overall, there is room for improvement in the design of whistleblowing policies, both in terms of fostering communication and transparency as well as the level of formality involved. This research answers Gao & Brink (2017) call for research into the differences and trends in corporate whistleblowing structures, besides having practical relevance for corporations that still lack whistleblowing policies or to those that intend to benchmark and strengthen their own.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-30T09:57:25Z
2022-10-13
2022-09
2022-10-13T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/39437
TID:203088581
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/39437
identifier_str_mv TID:203088581
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132046427160576