Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Losonczy, Anna Kornélia
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Orbán, Annamária, Benkő, Melinda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426
Resumo: This study examines the changes undergone by urban centers within Greater Budapest’s extension area, which was annexed to the capital of Hungary in 1950, and which is, with minor modifications, equivalent to the outer zone today. The article compares the development methods of two different political systems: state socialism (i.e., the communist regime) between 1950 and 1990, and post-socialist capitalism after 1990. Over a longer period, the urban development of Budapest has made a long but circular journey from decentralized to a decentralized–disjointed socio-spatial development system, passing through a centrally-planned communist era between 1945 and 1990. Nevertheless, closer examination of this process reveals that several paradigm shifts took place in the design methodology, which was strongly influenced by socio-economic changes. These shifts, layered upon the inherited structure, as well as the neglect or preference of different systems, caused great differences in the development histories of centers on the outskirts. Therefore, we have set up a development typology for the centers on the outskirts by summarizing the planning history at the city level. Based on how well the center was able to incorporate itself into the larger metropolis since 1950, we have distinguished the following development models: the metropolized, the transcript, the rehabilitated, and the urban village model. This typology is extended to include new urban centers that formed during state socialism (between 1950 and 1990) and post-socialist capitalism (since 1990).
id RCAP_678c07a2ec8ff6ac6d953661e5168962
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5426
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of BudapestBudapest; governance system; metropolization; polycentric city; urban development; urban planningThis study examines the changes undergone by urban centers within Greater Budapest’s extension area, which was annexed to the capital of Hungary in 1950, and which is, with minor modifications, equivalent to the outer zone today. The article compares the development methods of two different political systems: state socialism (i.e., the communist regime) between 1950 and 1990, and post-socialist capitalism after 1990. Over a longer period, the urban development of Budapest has made a long but circular journey from decentralized to a decentralized–disjointed socio-spatial development system, passing through a centrally-planned communist era between 1945 and 1990. Nevertheless, closer examination of this process reveals that several paradigm shifts took place in the design methodology, which was strongly influenced by socio-economic changes. These shifts, layered upon the inherited structure, as well as the neglect or preference of different systems, caused great differences in the development histories of centers on the outskirts. Therefore, we have set up a development typology for the centers on the outskirts by summarizing the planning history at the city level. Based on how well the center was able to incorporate itself into the larger metropolis since 1950, we have distinguished the following development models: the metropolized, the transcript, the rehabilitated, and the urban village model. This typology is extended to include new urban centers that formed during state socialism (between 1950 and 1990) and post-socialist capitalism (since 1990).Cogitatio2022-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 3 (2022): The Resilient Metropolis: Planning in an Era of Decentralization; 144-1582183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5426https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5426/5426Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Kornélia Losonczy, Annamária Orbán, Melinda Benkőinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLosonczy, Anna KornéliaOrbán, AnnamáriaBenkő, Melinda2023-01-26T21:15:33Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5426Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:42.371997Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
title Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
spellingShingle Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
Losonczy, Anna Kornélia
Budapest; governance system; metropolization; polycentric city; urban development; urban planning
title_short Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
title_full Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
title_fullStr Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
title_sort Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest
author Losonczy, Anna Kornélia
author_facet Losonczy, Anna Kornélia
Orbán, Annamária
Benkő, Melinda
author_role author
author2 Orbán, Annamária
Benkő, Melinda
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Losonczy, Anna Kornélia
Orbán, Annamária
Benkő, Melinda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Budapest; governance system; metropolization; polycentric city; urban development; urban planning
topic Budapest; governance system; metropolization; polycentric city; urban development; urban planning
description This study examines the changes undergone by urban centers within Greater Budapest’s extension area, which was annexed to the capital of Hungary in 1950, and which is, with minor modifications, equivalent to the outer zone today. The article compares the development methods of two different political systems: state socialism (i.e., the communist regime) between 1950 and 1990, and post-socialist capitalism after 1990. Over a longer period, the urban development of Budapest has made a long but circular journey from decentralized to a decentralized–disjointed socio-spatial development system, passing through a centrally-planned communist era between 1945 and 1990. Nevertheless, closer examination of this process reveals that several paradigm shifts took place in the design methodology, which was strongly influenced by socio-economic changes. These shifts, layered upon the inherited structure, as well as the neglect or preference of different systems, caused great differences in the development histories of centers on the outskirts. Therefore, we have set up a development typology for the centers on the outskirts by summarizing the planning history at the city level. Based on how well the center was able to incorporate itself into the larger metropolis since 1950, we have distinguished the following development models: the metropolized, the transcript, the rehabilitated, and the urban village model. This typology is extended to include new urban centers that formed during state socialism (between 1950 and 1990) and post-socialist capitalism (since 1990).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5426
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5426/5426
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Kornélia Losonczy, Annamária Orbán, Melinda Benkő
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Kornélia Losonczy, Annamária Orbán, Melinda Benkő
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 3 (2022): The Resilient Metropolis: Planning in an Era of Decentralization; 144-158
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130663675232256