Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa Carolina Gonçalves Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/114278
Resumo: Introduction: The term Liver Function Tests is commonly used to refer a combination of liver biochemical tests - ALT; AST; GGT; ALP; Bilirubin. Abnormalities in these five assays are a significant entity in critical illness, increasing the demand and burden of diagnostic imaging tests. Purpose: We intend to evaluate the abdominal ultrasound yield as diagnostic evaluation of Liver Function Tests abnormalities in critical care patients. Material and Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of all abdominal ultrasound requests of Intensive Care Service over a 2-year period. We matched the ultrasounds done with the indication Liver Function Tests abnormalities to both ultrasound report and laboratory results. Reports were reviewed and coded using a fixed coding scheme by two radiologists as "positive" (abnormal findings explain the laboratory results) or "negative". We also recorded ultrasonographic diagnoses and abnormalities. Results: Of 573 abdominal ultrasounds requests, 122 (21.3%) were due to Liver Function Tests abnormalities. Among these, 6 were coded as "positive" and were diagnosed as Cholecystitis (n=4), Portal Vein Thrombosis (n=1) and Sludge or Malignancy causing Biliary Tract Distension (n=1). Frequent described abnormalities include: Hepatomegaly (n=60), Steatosis (n=49), Gallbladder sludge (n=44) and Gallstones (n=24). Discussion: Abdominal ultrasound rarely found a cause for Liver Function Tests abnormalities. No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory parameters and "positive" ultrasounds, so we aren't yet able to know the subgroup of patients that would most likely benefit from ultrasound scan. Conclusion: The clinical indication of abdominal ultrasound as diagnostic evaluation of Liver Function Tests in critical care patients is questionable.
id RCAP_79d9d22468e37a017ef5b343adf46539
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/114278
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalitiesMedicina clínicaClinical medicineIntroduction: The term Liver Function Tests is commonly used to refer a combination of liver biochemical tests - ALT; AST; GGT; ALP; Bilirubin. Abnormalities in these five assays are a significant entity in critical illness, increasing the demand and burden of diagnostic imaging tests. Purpose: We intend to evaluate the abdominal ultrasound yield as diagnostic evaluation of Liver Function Tests abnormalities in critical care patients. Material and Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of all abdominal ultrasound requests of Intensive Care Service over a 2-year period. We matched the ultrasounds done with the indication Liver Function Tests abnormalities to both ultrasound report and laboratory results. Reports were reviewed and coded using a fixed coding scheme by two radiologists as "positive" (abnormal findings explain the laboratory results) or "negative". We also recorded ultrasonographic diagnoses and abnormalities. Results: Of 573 abdominal ultrasounds requests, 122 (21.3%) were due to Liver Function Tests abnormalities. Among these, 6 were coded as "positive" and were diagnosed as Cholecystitis (n=4), Portal Vein Thrombosis (n=1) and Sludge or Malignancy causing Biliary Tract Distension (n=1). Frequent described abnormalities include: Hepatomegaly (n=60), Steatosis (n=49), Gallbladder sludge (n=44) and Gallstones (n=24). Discussion: Abdominal ultrasound rarely found a cause for Liver Function Tests abnormalities. No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory parameters and "positive" ultrasounds, so we aren't yet able to know the subgroup of patients that would most likely benefit from ultrasound scan. Conclusion: The clinical indication of abdominal ultrasound as diagnostic evaluation of Liver Function Tests in critical care patients is questionable.2018-07-312018-07-31T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/114278TID:202850510engRosa Carolina Gonçalves Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:40:03Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/114278Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:06:22.185280Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
title Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
spellingShingle Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
Rosa Carolina Gonçalves Pereira
Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
title_short Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
title_full Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
title_fullStr Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
title_full_unstemmed Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
title_sort Abdominal ultrasound yield in critical care patients with liver function tests abnormalities
author Rosa Carolina Gonçalves Pereira
author_facet Rosa Carolina Gonçalves Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa Carolina Gonçalves Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
topic Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
description Introduction: The term Liver Function Tests is commonly used to refer a combination of liver biochemical tests - ALT; AST; GGT; ALP; Bilirubin. Abnormalities in these five assays are a significant entity in critical illness, increasing the demand and burden of diagnostic imaging tests. Purpose: We intend to evaluate the abdominal ultrasound yield as diagnostic evaluation of Liver Function Tests abnormalities in critical care patients. Material and Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of all abdominal ultrasound requests of Intensive Care Service over a 2-year period. We matched the ultrasounds done with the indication Liver Function Tests abnormalities to both ultrasound report and laboratory results. Reports were reviewed and coded using a fixed coding scheme by two radiologists as "positive" (abnormal findings explain the laboratory results) or "negative". We also recorded ultrasonographic diagnoses and abnormalities. Results: Of 573 abdominal ultrasounds requests, 122 (21.3%) were due to Liver Function Tests abnormalities. Among these, 6 were coded as "positive" and were diagnosed as Cholecystitis (n=4), Portal Vein Thrombosis (n=1) and Sludge or Malignancy causing Biliary Tract Distension (n=1). Frequent described abnormalities include: Hepatomegaly (n=60), Steatosis (n=49), Gallbladder sludge (n=44) and Gallstones (n=24). Discussion: Abdominal ultrasound rarely found a cause for Liver Function Tests abnormalities. No statistically significant correlation was found between laboratory parameters and "positive" ultrasounds, so we aren't yet able to know the subgroup of patients that would most likely benefit from ultrasound scan. Conclusion: The clinical indication of abdominal ultrasound as diagnostic evaluation of Liver Function Tests in critical care patients is questionable.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-31
2018-07-31T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/114278
TID:202850510
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/114278
identifier_str_mv TID:202850510
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135987691945985