Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10198/4023 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the total energy expenditure of the four competitive swimming strokes. Twenty-six swimmers of international level were submitted to an incremental set of 200-m swims (5 swimmers at Breaststroke, 5 swimmers at Backstroke, 4 swimmers at Butterfly and 12 swimmers at Front Crawl). The starting velocity was approximately 0.3m· s–1 less than a swimmer’s best performance and thereafter increased by 0.05m· s–1 after each swim until exhaustion. Cardio-pulmonary and gas exchange parameters were measured breath-by-breath (BxB) for each swim to analyze oxygen consumption (V˙ O2) and other energetic parameters by portable metabolic cart (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A respiratory snorkel and valve system with low hydrodynamic resistance was used to measure pulmonary ventilation and to collect breathing air samples. Blood samples from the ear lobe were collected before and after each swim to analyze blood lactate concentration (YSI 1500 L, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA). Total energy expenditure (E˙ tot), was calculated for each 200-m stage.E˙ tot differed significantly between the strokes at all selected velocities. At the velocity of 1.0m· s–1 and of 1.2m· s–1 the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.4m· s–1, the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Backstroke than in Freestyle, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.6m· s–1, the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. As a conclusion, E˙ tot of well-trained competitive swimmers was measured over a large range of velocities utilising a new BxB technique. Freestyle was shown to be the most economic among the competitive swimming strokes, followed by the Backstroke, the Butterfly and the Breaststroke. |
id |
RCAP_913f12a92718fcc94f9c19ac5d854d9b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/4023 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokesTotal energy expenditureAerobic contributionAnaerobic contributionSwimming strokesThe purpose of this study was to measure and compare the total energy expenditure of the four competitive swimming strokes. Twenty-six swimmers of international level were submitted to an incremental set of 200-m swims (5 swimmers at Breaststroke, 5 swimmers at Backstroke, 4 swimmers at Butterfly and 12 swimmers at Front Crawl). The starting velocity was approximately 0.3m· s–1 less than a swimmer’s best performance and thereafter increased by 0.05m· s–1 after each swim until exhaustion. Cardio-pulmonary and gas exchange parameters were measured breath-by-breath (BxB) for each swim to analyze oxygen consumption (V˙ O2) and other energetic parameters by portable metabolic cart (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A respiratory snorkel and valve system with low hydrodynamic resistance was used to measure pulmonary ventilation and to collect breathing air samples. Blood samples from the ear lobe were collected before and after each swim to analyze blood lactate concentration (YSI 1500 L, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA). Total energy expenditure (E˙ tot), was calculated for each 200-m stage.E˙ tot differed significantly between the strokes at all selected velocities. At the velocity of 1.0m· s–1 and of 1.2m· s–1 the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.4m· s–1, the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Backstroke than in Freestyle, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.6m· s–1, the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. As a conclusion, E˙ tot of well-trained competitive swimmers was measured over a large range of velocities utilising a new BxB technique. Freestyle was shown to be the most economic among the competitive swimming strokes, followed by the Backstroke, the Butterfly and the Breaststroke.Georg Thieme Verlag KGBiblioteca Digital do IPBBarbosa, Tiago M.Fernandes, Ricardo J.Keskinen, Kari L.Colaço, PauloCardoso, CarlaSilva, JoséVilas-Boas, João Paulo2011-04-12T13:26:53Z20062006-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/4023engBarbosa, Tiago M.; Fernandes, R.J.; Keskinen, K.L.; Colaço, P.; Cardoso, C.; Silva, J.; Vilas-Boas, J.P. (2006). Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes. International Journal of Sports Medicine. ISSN 0172-4622. 27: 894–8990172-462210.1055/s-2006-9237761439-3964info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:10:13Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/4023Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:56:39.358609Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
title |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes Barbosa, Tiago M. Total energy expenditure Aerobic contribution Anaerobic contribution Swimming strokes |
title_short |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
title_full |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes |
author |
Barbosa, Tiago M. |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Tiago M. Fernandes, Ricardo J. Keskinen, Kari L. Colaço, Paulo Cardoso, Carla Silva, José Vilas-Boas, João Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandes, Ricardo J. Keskinen, Kari L. Colaço, Paulo Cardoso, Carla Silva, José Vilas-Boas, João Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital do IPB |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Tiago M. Fernandes, Ricardo J. Keskinen, Kari L. Colaço, Paulo Cardoso, Carla Silva, José Vilas-Boas, João Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Total energy expenditure Aerobic contribution Anaerobic contribution Swimming strokes |
topic |
Total energy expenditure Aerobic contribution Anaerobic contribution Swimming strokes |
description |
The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the total energy expenditure of the four competitive swimming strokes. Twenty-six swimmers of international level were submitted to an incremental set of 200-m swims (5 swimmers at Breaststroke, 5 swimmers at Backstroke, 4 swimmers at Butterfly and 12 swimmers at Front Crawl). The starting velocity was approximately 0.3m· s–1 less than a swimmer’s best performance and thereafter increased by 0.05m· s–1 after each swim until exhaustion. Cardio-pulmonary and gas exchange parameters were measured breath-by-breath (BxB) for each swim to analyze oxygen consumption (V˙ O2) and other energetic parameters by portable metabolic cart (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A respiratory snorkel and valve system with low hydrodynamic resistance was used to measure pulmonary ventilation and to collect breathing air samples. Blood samples from the ear lobe were collected before and after each swim to analyze blood lactate concentration (YSI 1500 L, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA). Total energy expenditure (E˙ tot), was calculated for each 200-m stage.E˙ tot differed significantly between the strokes at all selected velocities. At the velocity of 1.0m· s–1 and of 1.2m· s–1 the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.4m· s–1, the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Backstroke than in Freestyle, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.6m· s–1, the E˙ tot was significantly higher in Breaststroke and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. As a conclusion, E˙ tot of well-trained competitive swimmers was measured over a large range of velocities utilising a new BxB technique. Freestyle was shown to be the most economic among the competitive swimming strokes, followed by the Backstroke, the Butterfly and the Breaststroke. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z 2011-04-12T13:26:53Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/4023 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10198/4023 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Tiago M.; Fernandes, R.J.; Keskinen, K.L.; Colaço, P.; Cardoso, C.; Silva, J.; Vilas-Boas, J.P. (2006). Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes. International Journal of Sports Medicine. ISSN 0172-4622. 27: 894–899 0172-4622 10.1055/s-2006-923776 1439-3964 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135176595341312 |