Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm110203 |
Resumo: | When adopting and using a Software Development Method (SDM), it is important to stay true to the philosophy of the method; otherwise, software developers might execute activities that do not lead to the intended outcomes. Currently, no overview of SDM research addresses software developers’ reasoning behind adopting and using SDMs. Accordingly, this paper aims to survey existing SDM research to scrutinize the current knowledge base on software developers’ type of reasoning behind SDM adoption and use. We executed a systematic literature review and analyzed existing research using two steps. First, we classified papers based on what type of reasoning was addressed regarding SDM adoption and use: rational, irrational, and non-rational. Second, we made a thematic synthesis across these three types of reasoning to provide a more detailed characterization of the existing research. We elicited 28 studies addressing software developers’ reasoning and identified five research themes. Building on these themes, we framed four future research directions with four broad research questions, which can be used as a basis for future research. |
id |
RCAP_ab0330dafdbf60ff965d7c90e8959a52 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5199 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature reviewsystems development methodsoftware development methodsystematic literature reviewuseadoptionWhen adopting and using a Software Development Method (SDM), it is important to stay true to the philosophy of the method; otherwise, software developers might execute activities that do not lead to the intended outcomes. Currently, no overview of SDM research addresses software developers’ reasoning behind adopting and using SDMs. Accordingly, this paper aims to survey existing SDM research to scrutinize the current knowledge base on software developers’ type of reasoning behind SDM adoption and use. We executed a systematic literature review and analyzed existing research using two steps. First, we classified papers based on what type of reasoning was addressed regarding SDM adoption and use: rational, irrational, and non-rational. Second, we made a thematic synthesis across these three types of reasoning to provide a more detailed characterization of the existing research. We elicited 28 studies addressing software developers’ reasoning and identified five research themes. Building on these themes, we framed four future research directions with four broad research questions, which can be used as a basis for future research.UMinho Editora2023-07-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm110203https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm110203International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 11 N.º 2 (2023); 47-78International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023); 47-782182-7788reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/5199https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/5199/5742Havstorm, Tanja ElinaKarlsson, Fredrikinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-15T09:30:14Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5199Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:34:48.939786Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
title |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
spellingShingle |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review Havstorm, Tanja Elina systems development method software development method systematic literature review use adoption |
title_short |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
title_full |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
title_sort |
Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review |
author |
Havstorm, Tanja Elina |
author_facet |
Havstorm, Tanja Elina Karlsson, Fredrik |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Karlsson, Fredrik |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Havstorm, Tanja Elina Karlsson, Fredrik |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
systems development method software development method systematic literature review use adoption |
topic |
systems development method software development method systematic literature review use adoption |
description |
When adopting and using a Software Development Method (SDM), it is important to stay true to the philosophy of the method; otherwise, software developers might execute activities that do not lead to the intended outcomes. Currently, no overview of SDM research addresses software developers’ reasoning behind adopting and using SDMs. Accordingly, this paper aims to survey existing SDM research to scrutinize the current knowledge base on software developers’ type of reasoning behind SDM adoption and use. We executed a systematic literature review and analyzed existing research using two steps. First, we classified papers based on what type of reasoning was addressed regarding SDM adoption and use: rational, irrational, and non-rational. Second, we made a thematic synthesis across these three types of reasoning to provide a more detailed characterization of the existing research. We elicited 28 studies addressing software developers’ reasoning and identified five research themes. Building on these themes, we framed four future research directions with four broad research questions, which can be used as a basis for future research. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm110203 https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm110203 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm110203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/5199 https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/5199/5742 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UMinho Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UMinho Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 11 N.º 2 (2023); 47-78 International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023); 47-78 2182-7788 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132074509074432 |