Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garmanjani, Rohollah
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Júdice, Diogo, Vicente, Luís Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/44582
https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683
Resumo: Trust-region methods are a broad class of methods for continuous optimization that found application in a variety of problems and contexts. In particular, they have been studied and applied for problems without using derivatives. The analysis of trust-region derivative-free methods has focused on global convergence, and they have been proven to generate a sequence of iterates converging to stationarity independently of the starting point. Most of such an analysis is carried out in the smooth case, and, moreover, little is known about the complexity or global rate of these methods. In this paper, we start by analyzing the worst case complexity of general trust-region derivative-free methods for smooth functions. For the nonsmooth case, we propose a smoothing approach, for which we prove global convergence and bound the worst case complexity effort. For the special case of nonsmooth functions that result from the composition of smooth and nonsmooth/convex components, we show how to improve the existing results of the literature and make them applicable to the general methodology.
id RCAP_adf4fa49f099f044946a7f0f0f00a171
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/44582
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth CaseTrust-region methods are a broad class of methods for continuous optimization that found application in a variety of problems and contexts. In particular, they have been studied and applied for problems without using derivatives. The analysis of trust-region derivative-free methods has focused on global convergence, and they have been proven to generate a sequence of iterates converging to stationarity independently of the starting point. Most of such an analysis is carried out in the smooth case, and, moreover, little is known about the complexity or global rate of these methods. In this paper, we start by analyzing the worst case complexity of general trust-region derivative-free methods for smooth functions. For the nonsmooth case, we propose a smoothing approach, for which we prove global convergence and bound the worst case complexity effort. For the special case of nonsmooth functions that result from the composition of smooth and nonsmooth/convex components, we show how to improve the existing results of the literature and make them applicable to the general methodology.Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/44582http://hdl.handle.net/10316/44582https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683enghttps://doi.org/10.1137/151005683Garmanjani, RohollahJúdice, DiogoVicente, Luís Nunesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-06-29T10:03:20Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/44582Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:53:24.801527Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
title Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
spellingShingle Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
Garmanjani, Rohollah
title_short Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
title_full Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
title_fullStr Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
title_full_unstemmed Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
title_sort Trust-Region Methods Without Using Derivatives: Worst Case Complexity and the NonSmooth Case
author Garmanjani, Rohollah
author_facet Garmanjani, Rohollah
Júdice, Diogo
Vicente, Luís Nunes
author_role author
author2 Júdice, Diogo
Vicente, Luís Nunes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garmanjani, Rohollah
Júdice, Diogo
Vicente, Luís Nunes
description Trust-region methods are a broad class of methods for continuous optimization that found application in a variety of problems and contexts. In particular, they have been studied and applied for problems without using derivatives. The analysis of trust-region derivative-free methods has focused on global convergence, and they have been proven to generate a sequence of iterates converging to stationarity independently of the starting point. Most of such an analysis is carried out in the smooth case, and, moreover, little is known about the complexity or global rate of these methods. In this paper, we start by analyzing the worst case complexity of general trust-region derivative-free methods for smooth functions. For the nonsmooth case, we propose a smoothing approach, for which we prove global convergence and bound the worst case complexity effort. For the special case of nonsmooth functions that result from the composition of smooth and nonsmooth/convex components, we show how to improve the existing results of the literature and make them applicable to the general methodology.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/44582
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/44582
https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683
https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/44582
https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1137/151005683
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133821133651968