Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coutinho, Maria do Carmo Pinto Leite Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29874
Resumo: Artificial Intelligence (AI) gained centrality in society and organizations, with an ongoing unparalleled potential for change in work settings and in how workers relate to employers. Human Resource Management (HRM) is not an exception as there are many proposals, and implementations, of AI-based apps that replace or aid HRM processes. Still, change does not come without doubts and without general endorsement, change is doomed to failure or at the minimum, to suboptimal effectiveness. This thesis is designed to test to which extent individuals endorse automated Human Resource Management (a-HRM) based on normative dimensions, namely accountability, fairness, legitimacy, explainability, and reversibility. Based on a sample of 253 employees, findings using PLS-SEM models showed that legitimacy is the key variable explaining HRM functional domains AI endorsement, which overall are contributive to general a-HRM endorsement. Findings are discussed in light of theory and of the conclusions inferred towards its future albeit overall findings suggest constructs are not yet clear enough to allow for inferences made on solid ground.
id RCAP_ae3bcc2fc2b3f83cfdc64a723a302ab3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29874
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensionsInteligência artificial -- Artificial intelligenceHuman resource managementEndorsementNormative dimensionsGestão de recursos humanosAceitaçãoDimensões normativasArtificial Intelligence (AI) gained centrality in society and organizations, with an ongoing unparalleled potential for change in work settings and in how workers relate to employers. Human Resource Management (HRM) is not an exception as there are many proposals, and implementations, of AI-based apps that replace or aid HRM processes. Still, change does not come without doubts and without general endorsement, change is doomed to failure or at the minimum, to suboptimal effectiveness. This thesis is designed to test to which extent individuals endorse automated Human Resource Management (a-HRM) based on normative dimensions, namely accountability, fairness, legitimacy, explainability, and reversibility. Based on a sample of 253 employees, findings using PLS-SEM models showed that legitimacy is the key variable explaining HRM functional domains AI endorsement, which overall are contributive to general a-HRM endorsement. Findings are discussed in light of theory and of the conclusions inferred towards its future albeit overall findings suggest constructs are not yet clear enough to allow for inferences made on solid ground.A Inteligência Artificial (IA) ganhou centralidade na sociedade e nas organizações, com um potencial inigualável de mudança nos ambientes de trabalho e na forma como os trabalhadores se relacionam com os empregadores. A Gestão de Recursos Humanos (GRH) não é exceção, pois existem muitas propostas e implementações de aplicações baseadas em IA que substituem ou auxiliam os processos de GRH. Ainda assim, a mudança não acontece sem dúvidas e, sem aceitação a mudança está condenada ao fracasso ou, no mínimo, a uma eficácia subóptima. Este estudo foi concebido para testar em que medida os indivíduos aceitam a GRH automatizada com base em dimensões normativas, nomeadamente ao nível da responsabilização, da justiça, da legitimidade, da explicabilidade e da reversibilidade. Com base numa amostra de 253 trabalhadores, os resultados obtidos através de modelos PLS-SEM revelaram que a legitimidade é a variável-chave que explica a aceitação da IA nos domínios funcionais da GRH, os quais contribuem globalmente para a aceitação geral da automatização da GRH. Os resultados são discutidos à luz da teoria e são retiradas conclusões para o seu futuro, embora os resultados globais sugiram que os construtos ainda não são suficientemente claros para permitir inferências feitas em bases sólidas.2023-12-04T14:14:54Z2023-11-20T00:00:00Z2023-11-202023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/29874TID:203407750engCoutinho, Maria do Carmo Pinto Leite Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-10T01:18:20Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29874Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:41:51.357098Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
title Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
spellingShingle Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
Coutinho, Maria do Carmo Pinto Leite Pereira
Inteligência artificial -- Artificial intelligence
Human resource management
Endorsement
Normative dimensions
Gestão de recursos humanos
Aceitação
Dimensões normativas
title_short Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
title_full Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
title_sort Artificial intelligence in human resource management: Exploring endorsement through normative dimensions
author Coutinho, Maria do Carmo Pinto Leite Pereira
author_facet Coutinho, Maria do Carmo Pinto Leite Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coutinho, Maria do Carmo Pinto Leite Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inteligência artificial -- Artificial intelligence
Human resource management
Endorsement
Normative dimensions
Gestão de recursos humanos
Aceitação
Dimensões normativas
topic Inteligência artificial -- Artificial intelligence
Human resource management
Endorsement
Normative dimensions
Gestão de recursos humanos
Aceitação
Dimensões normativas
description Artificial Intelligence (AI) gained centrality in society and organizations, with an ongoing unparalleled potential for change in work settings and in how workers relate to employers. Human Resource Management (HRM) is not an exception as there are many proposals, and implementations, of AI-based apps that replace or aid HRM processes. Still, change does not come without doubts and without general endorsement, change is doomed to failure or at the minimum, to suboptimal effectiveness. This thesis is designed to test to which extent individuals endorse automated Human Resource Management (a-HRM) based on normative dimensions, namely accountability, fairness, legitimacy, explainability, and reversibility. Based on a sample of 253 employees, findings using PLS-SEM models showed that legitimacy is the key variable explaining HRM functional domains AI endorsement, which overall are contributive to general a-HRM endorsement. Findings are discussed in light of theory and of the conclusions inferred towards its future albeit overall findings suggest constructs are not yet clear enough to allow for inferences made on solid ground.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-04T14:14:54Z
2023-11-20T00:00:00Z
2023-11-20
2023-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29874
TID:203407750
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29874
identifier_str_mv TID:203407750
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136320822444032